So the guns are only a symbolic defense against tyranny?It's the principle of the thing.
(...that kills tens of thousands a year)
I guess it's been long enough that people have forgotten what I proposed.Seriously, how would you get rid of firearms already in the hands of those that would do you harm?
If I was in charge of the US right now, I'd require all firearms to be insured, for starters. Market forces would sort out a lot of the problems: safe and responsible gun owners would pay low rates. People who engage in risky activities would pay accordingly... or in most cases, wouldn't be able to afford being risky with a firearm.
For criminal weapons, I would make it so that the last legal owner of a weapon - starting with the mamufacturer and going on down - is liable for damages for the criminal use of their weapon unless they can demonstrate that they legally transferred it to someone else. In the case of crimes committed with stolen weapons, the owner would have to demonstrate that they took all proper steps to secure the weapon against theft to not be liable.
Also (and I'm not sure if I mentioned this before), I would get rid of all "castle doctrine" laws.