SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
You should have read the upper part of that page, it would have been more useful (and accurate) for us."simpliticism"..... I had to look that word up.....I think you made it up.
Did you ever consider the reason why people choose to opt out of the orthodox medical system?
Could it be that they were sick and tired of being.....sick and tired?
If the medical establishment was effecting cures and treatments with no horrendous side effects, and people were actually getting well with their "treatments", then there would be no need to search for an alternative in the first place. Thank God the alternative practitioners and health food stores exist.....but we wonder for how long? So many people are choosing these as a way to get healthy. Do they make money off this? Of course they do, but what about the cost in the orthodox system?...and with not much in the way of a success rate in curing anyone. I have had more results with natural therapists than I ever had with doctors.
How many ways are we exposed to the things that make us sick? Aren't they all man made? It seems as if the world we live in at present is designed by greedy humans to deliberately accomplish this.
I have also had way more success in treating illness by preventing it than by taking pills to suppress symptoms of something my body was telling me was wrong. Naturopaths are like doctors....some of them are complete quacks. But I have found that good alternative practitioners are very good at diagnosing and treating the cause of disease rather than just masking the symptoms with artificial chemicals. The whole pharma industry is based on "artificial" substances that are not compatible with the human body.....that is what causes the side effects....and there are always a long list of them.....or haven't you noticed?
The K.I.S.S principle works in medicine just as it does in many other areas of life. Complexity doesn't always solve problems.
Herbs are the basis of many drugs used by the pharmaceutical industry because they are known to treat disease, but because they cannot patent a plant, they must extract components and make drugs out of them, devoid of the rest of the necessary compounds that make it efficacious. They add artificially produced substances that make the body respond negatively to it...side effects are the body's way of saying that it is not accepting of what is being put into it. So what does big pharma do? They will give you other drugs to treat the side effects and then others to treat those side effects and......cher ching! $$$$$....Talk about the billions!?.....Do you see something wrong with this picture?
I like the comment after that incredibly biased and misinformed article you quoted....
"Reader Response (2/14/00)
You, sir, are the quack. How could you even think of saying, "With safe and effective medicines available, treatment with herbs rarely makes sense."? The correct statement would be: "With all those dangerous drugs available, with all those terrible side effects, treatment with herbs is the only choice." All pharmaceuticals are toxic to the human body. Over 150,000 hospital patients die every year from taking the prescribed dosage of a drug prescribed to them by their doctor. Drugs have their place—in emergencies only—or when a condition has become so bad that the patient is willing to deal with the side effects in order to treat the main problem. Modern "medicine" is more of a scam than herbal medicine could ever be. If people with health problems would stay away from drug stores and spend more time in health food stores, people would live longer, stay healthier, and have a better quality of life. Talk to the men who take blood pressure "medicine" and can no longer get an erection. Talk to the relatives of the men who died from taking viagra. Drugs only address the symptoms, herbs address the cause. Drugs simply mask the symptoms, herbs assist in the healing.
I have a B.S. in education from Indiana State University, have been studying natural medicine for 17 years, and have been working as a health food store manager and nutritional consultant for 7 years. My disdain for pharmaceutical industry is the result of hearing the horror stories of my customers about the side effects of the drugs they have used. Many of the herb shop customers of today are people who have had bad experiences with prescription drugs and/or doctors who won't listen to or work with them. In a way i am thankful for the drug industry, because they drive many people into health food stores. I don't mean to imply that there is no place for drugs, because there definitely is a place for them. However drugs should be the last resort"
I have to agree with the sentiments expressed here.
"In the United States, herbs intended for preventive or therapeutic use would be regulated as drugs under federal laws. To evade the law, these products are marketed as "foods" or "dietary supplements" without health claims on their labels. Since these are not regulated as drugs, no legal standards exist for their processing, harvesting, or packaging. In many cases, particularly for products with expensive raw ingredients, contents and potency are not accurately disclosed on the label. Many products marked as herbs contain no useful ingredients, and some even lack the principal ingredient for which people buy them. Surveys have found have found that the ingredients and doses of several products varied considerably from brand to brand.
A Good Housekeeping Institute analysis of six widely available St. John's wort supplement capsules and four liquid extracts revealed a lack of consistency of the suspected active ingredients, hypericin and pseudohypericin. The study found:
- A 17-fold difference between the capsules containing the smallest amount of hypericin and those containing the largest amount, based on manufacturer's maximum recommended dosage.
- A 13-fold difference in pseudohypericin in the capsules.
- A 7-to-8-fold differential from the highest to the lowest levels of liquid extracts [1].
- In 2010, ConsumerLab told me that nearly half of the herbal products they had tested for quality had failed their evaluations. The reason for failure included too little or too little of the main ingredient, potentially dangerous or illegal ingredients, contamination with heavy metals, "spiking" with unexpected ingredients, and misleading or incomplete product information.
- In 2013, Canadian researchers used DNA barcoding (a type of genetic "fingerprinting") to test 44 products from 12 companies and found that 59% of the products contained ingredients not listed on the label, 30 of the 44 products had ingredient substitutions, and some contained contaminants that posed health risks to users [6]."
P.S. As I've pointed out to you several times now, scientists isolate the bio active ingredients found in plants because said ingredients work more effectively that way, are more potent that way, and can be more easily measured and controlled that way. In other words, it's safer and more efficient.
The reason you gave about not be able to patent plants is a fabrication. You can actually patent plants if you want, within certain guidelines:
General Information About 35 U.S.C. 161 Plant Patents
Last edited: