• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"Creationists demand equal airtime on Neil deGrasse Tyson’s ‘Cosmos’ to provide ‘balance’"

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
I love how the term "Creationist" actually means "Nonintellectual Biblical Literalist". It is not science they wish to teach it is religion. If the Christians get to have their say then we can teach that Google created the universe which is entirely truthful
 

Triumphant_Loser

Libertarian Egalitarian
So did you because I thought I wouldn't have to make enemies with a fellow deist.

Sorry about that dude. Sometimes its kind of hard to distinguish religious fundamentalism from parody. :D Just out of curiosity... What is "Wathanism" and is it related to Deism in some way? And does it use the Hamsa as a religious symbol? Just curious. :cool:
 

yoda89

On Xtended Vacation
50centdriving.gif
 

Mycroft

Ministry of Serendipity
I think the producers of Cosmos should let the creationist have their say,


Sorry, but Seth McFarlane has already come out and said that he hopes Cosmos will do much to combat creationist 'junk science'. I don't see him including the very same 'junk science' in his programme.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Sorry, but Seth McFarlane has already come out and said that he hopes Cosmos will do much to combat creationist 'junk science'. I don't see him including the very same 'junk science' in his programme.


Pseudoscience has no place on TV or any school of any kind. ;)


Really there is no need in society for such.
 

IHaveTheGift

U know who U R
I haven't watched the program, tried to, but Mr Degrasse doesn't hold my attention.
Wish they would have used someone else, anyone else, Science Guy would have worked, lol

I sort of do have a problem if science talks about data with the intention to mislead, to purposely debunking God, I hope that isn't what Tyson is doing.
 
Last edited:
Top