Creationists, please provide evidence

[camanintx]

Human babies don't rear themselves. How is the only answer God? Where is your reasoning?

There is no "there" there.

 

[waitasec]

The whole point of the chicken and the egg is not to prove whether eggs came first but rather to prove that no human baby can rear themselves! Please prove that from an athiestic perspective!!

what you are doing is comparing the modern human baby primate to that of an earlier version, right?

 

[Dirty Penguin]

Important distinction, as many animal species are independent from birth.

Thanks for the edit and that's where I was going with this....

 

[outhouse]

Im getting tired of this site,

your getting tired of reality, reason and logic.

please do yourself a favor and get a real education, ignorance is no way to go through life.

 

[Dirty Penguin]

Ur being stupid!

Please let us all step back, take a deep breath, and try to continue our debates in a civil manner please.

 

[David M]

To claim humans have been on eath for 200,000years is a folly. U cant prove it urself....Anyway it doesnt prove evolution....that would take millions of years.....
As for the egg coming first....who created the egg....God maybe! Anyway the point about the chicken and egg is not when they came about but rather how they reared themselves....NO HUMAN BABY CAN REAR THEMSELVES>>>>but I take u know that....One up for CREATIONISM!

The existence of humans for 200,000 years is a fact, its been proven.

Huge numbers of species that lay eggs do not rear their young. That humans and chicken rear their young is no evidence against evolution as this can also evolve starting from species that do not rear their young and developing over time.

 

[painted wolf]

The only people who claim that humans appeared without parents is creationism... therefore Gateway, your argument is against yourself, not evolution. Congratulations, you just disproved your own position.

wa:do

 

[waitasec]

The only people who claim that humans appeared without parents is creationism... therefore Gateway, your argument is against yourself, not evolution. Congratulations, you just disproved your own position.

wa:do

they believe in a sky daddy remember?




ps
i love your signature
i'm lexdysic

 

[McBell]

How could evoltion hold true....sure there were 50 million people around Christs time....How many do u honestly believe were around in 10,000BC....not many!....It would take millions of years for evolution to hold any truth whatsoever.....but still u cant explain the chicken and the egg!

The chicken and the egg has already been addressed.
So the question now is:

Are you really honestly that stupid or are you just protecting your willful ignorance?
​

 

[McBell]

To claim humans have been on eath for 200,000years is a folly. U cant prove it urself....Anyway it doesnt prove evolution....that would take millions of years.....
As for the egg coming first....who created the egg....God maybe! Anyway the point about the chicken and egg is not when they came about but rather how they reared themselves....NO HUMAN BABY CAN REAR THEMSELVES>>>>but I take u know that....One up for CREATIONISM!

What?
Is that the best creationism has to offer?
No wonder creationists have been losing court cases left and right.

 

[McBell]

The whole point of the chicken and the egg is not to prove whether eggs came first but rather to prove that no human baby can rear themselves! Please prove that from an athiestic perspective!!

Why does it need to be proven that a human baby can rear itself?
Seems to me that your whole argument is based upon your ignorance of how evolution actually works.

Let me guess, you are a huge fan of Kent Hovind, aren't you?

 

[camanintx]

Seems to me that your whole argument is based upon your ignorance of how evolution actually works.

Aren't they all?

 

[Autodidact]

how can you prove that human is from the monkey?...if i say you Hey you MONKEy!!you LIKE? THe unbelievers of CHRISt thiers hearts is prejudice and their ears is closed. to listen the words of God...in GEnesis account in the bible.God created human like His Image..HE form us From the dust and HE braeth US from our nostril A breadth of life.and we became a living soul...the story of CHARLES DARWIN in the book of secret terrorist, JESUITS paid Darwin to made a Theory to contradict the BIBLE to hide the truth..and finaly WHen Darwin died HE said in his book..HIs Theory has FACT at all.and it was proven..in 1726 if im not mistaken one of the specialist Doctor he studied the monkey and human if de same organs..he foud out in his study that human and monkey is very different...
God love the human race not and HE gave HIS begotten son JEsus To died for our behalf.not the monkeys behalf

Hey John, mind if I send this in to FSTDT?

 

[Autodidact]

Its obvious u cant answer the question and are resorting to mocking!!

We're trying to control ourselves, gateway, but it's hard to resist such wonderful material.

 

[McBell]

Its obvious u cant answer the question and are resorting to mocking!!

No, I do not HAVE to be sarcastic, you just keep giving me SO MUCH to work with.

 

[diosangpastol]

2 and many more. Using argon-argon dating, Science had proven that humans exist as early as 160,000 years ago

1. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/...in558165.shtml
2. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=1295624

 

[diosangpastol]

To claim humans have been on eath for 200,000years is a folly. U cant prove it urself....Anyway it doesnt prove evolution....that would take millions of years.....
As for the egg coming first....who created the egg....God maybe! Anyway the point about the chicken and egg is not when they came about but rather how they reared themselves....NO HUMAN BABY CAN REAR THEMSELVES>>>>but I take u know that....One up for CREATIONISM!

Hi Gateway,

do you disagree on old techniques of the scientist ?

 

[rusra02]

The only people who claim that humans appeared without parents is creationism... therefore Gateway, your argument is against yourself, not evolution. Congratulations, you just disproved your own position.

wa:do

No, that is not true. Luke 3:38 says that Adam was God's son, part of his universal family. Being created by God, Adam was God's son. Because Adam sinned, he lost this precious relationship with God. (Romans 5:12)

 

[kylixguru]

No, that is not true. Luke 3:38 says that Adam was God's son, part of his universal family. Being created by God, Adam was God's son. Because Adam sinned, he lost this precious relationship with God. (Romans 5:12)

Which points to earlier creation cycles because where did Adam's Father come from? And where does a Father's Father come from? This all points to evolutionary origins of even God Himself.

 

[outhouse]

No, that is not true. Luke 3:38 says that Adam was God's son, part of his universal family. Being created by God, Adam was God's son. Because Adam sinned, he lost this precious relationship with God. (Romans 5:12)

sure sounds like a pagan myth to me.


all myths had a god that had a son LOL

do you undertsand how primitive this sounds?