You think I am going to be convinced that all these words are not true and don't point to modern scientific discoveries. I think you are escaping these facts to hide from your own selves and mask the calling sound of the truth.
As you believe in the theory of coincidence and chance, I believe you say that a man from the desert suddenly saw a mountain and said I think it keeps the earth stable ad after 1400 it proves to be true-by chance-. Then he finds out about the development of embryo then it proves to be true by chance. He takes about wind and rain in and finds facts –which by chance- was found to be true.
And why would he enter in a field not known by him and would later on prove to be false. If he wasn't sure of what he said why would he talk about something that may be proven wrong and would break down his religion?
What if he messed up and said things totally illogical?
It appears that all the scientific glances are true, at least to me.
And do you think the Qur'an would mention a scientific reference?
The Qur'an gives hints as it isn't originally a scientific reference book, but these hints appear to be different.
Talking about widening of the universe, earth, wind , rain, human embryo, honey, movement of the sun ,etc isn't direct scientific hints that were proven true?
Why would he mention these hints to a group of people living in the desert and have very simple thinking and at that time these hints are confusing to them and they may not believe?
What would an Arabian think if he hears that the sun moves around an axis?
And later on it turns to be true?!!
There must certain look to the future and upcoming of science and knowledge.