Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As I just posted on another thread, my rabbi just went through the ACA and now is going to be getting slightly better coverage at roughly half the price, and it's through the same company.
I spoke prematurely.
He can't fully sign up yet....2 months of attempting, & not there yet.
It's proceeding again.
What a ridiculous process.
I can really understand the appeal of the conspiracy theory that Obama
designed it to fail so that he can launch single payer as the solution.
(I said "understand"...not "buy".)
I do believe a Canuckistanian style single payer system would be better than Obamacare.I "understand" but like you don't "buy" but "hope".
I do believe a Canuckistanian style single payer system would be better than Obamacare.
But I don't hope for it. The very act of my hoping for it would doom it.
So I am aloof.
I am actively not hoping for anything (politically).What act are you hoping for?
It's proceeding again.
What a ridiculous process.
I can really understand the appeal of the conspiracy theory that Obama
designed it to fail so that he can launch single payer as the solution.
(I said "understand"...not "buy".)
The application is done.What does that mean..."it's proceeding again"..?
Did he delete his application and start over and is getting the same result?
Maybe he should delete his application and go and sit down with a navigator this time around.
Like I said...I know someone that was having trouble similar to your son but when the delete application unction was added they started over and signed up in less than half an hour and will now be covered.
I can't remember who it was but there was an RF member that went through the same thing and is now covered.
It's proceeding again.
What a ridiculous process.
I can really understand the appeal of the conspiracy theory that Obama
designed it to fail so that he can launch single payer as the solution.
(I said "understand"...not "buy".)
Beware unintended consequences of creating new incentives.A historically high number of people will be locked out of the workforce by 2021, according to a report by the Congressional Budget Office released Tuesday.
President Barack Obama's signature health-care law will contribute to this phenomenon, the CBO said, citing new estimates that the Affordable Care Act will cause a larger-than-expected reduction in working hours—eliminating the equivalent of about 2.3 million workers in 2021.
This a most unexpected up side to Obamacare. Perhaps we should lower the min wageIf one reads the CBO report, there's more to the story of why they cite these figure, and some of the reason is actually quite positive for a segment of our society who will have the freedom to quite a job they may hate and more on to getting another job or starting their own business.
This a most unexpected up side to Obamacare. Perhaps we should lower the min wage so that segment of society will be inspired to get a better job or start a business, eh?
Just think of all those frustrated people that go on those TV shows dreaming to become the next great American talent and have their dreams dashed by reality, now under Obamacare they can chase those dreams. Just think, Obamacare is going to bring about that utopian society where you don't have to worry about making a living, Uncle Sugar is going to take care of you from cradle to grave. Just think no more worrying about climbing that ladder to better oneself, the government is there for you. Where else but a liberal-progressive society can one shuck of the mantel of hard work and responsibility and be assured that you do not have to worry.“You want to be a photographer or a writer or a musician, whatever — an artist, you want to be self-employed, if you want to start a business, you want to change jobs, you no longer are prohibited from doing that because you can’t have access to health care, especially because you do not want to put your family at risk,”
But now we see the apparent argument that cutting back on employee hours will inspireWhere else but a liberal-progressive society can one shuck of the mantel of hard work and responsibility and be assured that you do not have to worry.
Well, the CBO is right or wrong depending upon whether it serves or hurts Obamacare.Maybe a little too far overboard, but what the heck, if the Obama Administration can spin the CBO report into their favor I can do the opposite.
Since the release of the CBO report, I have not been able to understand the right wingnuts "points" about it at all.
It has been clear all along that the CBO report was stating that those who would otherwise retire, but feared to, due to the resulting loss of insurance, will finally have the freedom to retire...rather than continue to be the disgruntled servants of their companies.
This is a win for those people, and their employers. PLUS those 2.1 million jobs will open up for incoming workers. The employment rate goes up. The economy goes up. Overall public happiness goes up (unless you're a neocon hack). The CBO report NEVER said that 2.1 million JOBS would be lost. :no: It stated that 2.1 million jobs will open up, because 2.1 million LABORERS will feel safe enough to retire.
No spin. Plain as day. End of story.
Workers eligible to buy cheaper health insurance or receive financial incentives under the Affordable Care Act may choose to work fewer hours, according to a Congressional Budget Office report released Tuesday.
Those choices, the report said, may cut the number of full-time workers by 2.3 million people by 2021. CBO originally had estimated that 800,000 people may make those choices.
"By providing subsidies that decline with rising income (and increase with falling income), and by making some people financially better off, the Affordable Care Act will create an incentive for some people to work less," the report states. "The structure of the tax code in which rising incomes push some people into higher tax brackets will also reduce labor force participation slightly."