Bishadi
Active Member
Was my question and you said something of common sense but not of the science taught in todays world.
So please if you are going to mirror todays sciences then present what todays math says, not what common sense tells us all.
Oops. First mistake as from gamma all the way to the known radio; its all em (light) and that means; em is the energy every time of all energy between mass.
Heat is that goof in the electrical universe as it seems chemistry defines our elements combine by electron exchanges between the shells of atoms. When in reality; that mass is simply increasing its mass with more energy (em) upon the mass (molecular structures). i.e a rock with more heat has greater potential than the same rock, cold. And E=mc2 also means mass is potential in time as well its opposite energy (light) is also mass exchanged in time.
Basic common sense and even a kid can figure that out but that is not what todays chemistry suggests.
And heat; in your definition is simply a range, when the whole spectrum is that range; to the mass each affects. We only see a certain range but the area that is changing is to remove anything below H as the base constituent as nothing in this universe is separate from a base atom unless energy (em) cause it. Which means all them particles found (identified) in them accelerators are created by the very experiment they are observing. Like shooting up fireworks and saying oooooh look at all the pretty colors but them pursuits use up more money and energy than many whole countries do. A waste of resources.
And if you like to observe history find Einstein himself had no idea what an electron was and even said something to the effect, before building them machines, I would like to know what an electron is when asked if he thought if congress should approve the expense. I think I read that in 86 . While playing with Bohr and some of the firecracker stuff; what Lorenz shift shares that relativity is incorrect and the observance of fission proves it but do you know why? Because point particles less than an atoms are simply energy affixed in time with momentum.
That is pretty good but not how the sciences share heat and that is the conflict; we as human being can understand the concept but the current observances in the sciences and entropy . ruins the day. But most do not know this.
This is wiki . In a thermodynamic sense, heat is never regarded as being stored within a body. Like work, it exists only as energy in transit from one body to another; in thermodynamic terminology, between a system and its surroundings. When energy in the form of heat is added to a system, it is stored not as heat, but as kinetic and potential energy of the atoms and molecules making up the system.
But then another says: ..Heat is a form of energy possessed by a substance by virtue of the vibrational movement, i.e. kinetic energy, of its molecules or atoms.
Then Maxwell; In modern terms, heat is concisely defined as energy in transit. Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell, in his 1871 classic Theory of Heat, was one of the first to enunciate a modern definition of heat. In short, Maxwell outlined four stipulations on the definition of heat. One, it is something which may be transferred from one body to another, as per the second law of thermodynamics. Two, it can be spoken of as a measurable quantity, and thus treated mathematically like other measurable quantities. Three, it can not be treated as a substance; for it may be transformed into something which is not a substance, e.g. mechanical work. Lastly, it is one of the forms of energy.
PER THE 2nd LAW OF what . Entropy
Do the math; that is all I can say and then try and comprehend heat in its true form. Em upon mass with momentum . Which one is correct?
In biology chemistry suggests achemical reaction occurs and then x and y make u structure with b amount of heat released. But do not recognize that b is imposing to the environment causing c and d to react by the release for their state. Meaning; each reaction becomes a catalyst to the neighborhood structure and this resonant energy released is more important than the molecular structures themselves. The energy is the gain, not the mass; as the energy is increasing its total potential upon mass; a complete opposite of an entropic system. Think of the golden ratio and how the mass increases its attrition to capture more mass increasing the life of the system. That is what life does; it can move and impose upon the environment to continue.
and this is old school. Like water and oil; hydrophilic and hydrophobic these are ruined by simply addressing energy as it is; the opposing wavelength upon the mass will not associate. Like a badly tuned guitar or a well tuned guitar; the good will resonate and combine; the opposing is a mess; just like any person trying to understand life within the confined of either religion or the mess of todays sciences.
nope .. well aware of just about every field of biology, chemistry, physics, molecular science, particle physics and to a level of understanding the math and application to the unversal equation
and did I leave anything out?
Oh yea Freud its moms fault
Some people talk, some people do; this is all I do!
Been doing for over 25 years and just coming out of the closet to give it all away for free.
Which nobel do you want? Or simply the answers are easy if the science is observed correctly; the rest is all about people with integrity to take the reins and run; but the first one who sells or makes claim to be the first will be rudely awakened.
) but even I know that the body temperature is raised when the body is infected as an attempt by the body (immuno response) to destroy/impede pathogens, at higher temperatures some of these pathogens cannot metabolise, replicate or their proteins/enzymes are simply denatured.