leibowde84
Veteran Member
I think that immortality is impossible because of Murphy's law. Whatever can happen, will happen given enough time.And what do you think of the jellyfish and do you think that immortality is biologically impossible?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think that immortality is impossible because of Murphy's law. Whatever can happen, will happen given enough time.And what do you think of the jellyfish and do you think that immortality is biologically impossible?
Ignored? Frankly, most of the time I don't even remember their existence. So-called prophecies are unconvincing at best.
I thought those were two separate matters, but sure.Why the prophecies are unconvincing? do you think that it just happened to be so, just coincidences.
It seems that most either weren't that hard to predict or simply were coincidental.Why the prophecies are unconvincing? do you think that it just happened to be so, just coincidences.
I think that immortality is impossible because of Murphy's law. Whatever can happen, will happen given enough time.
I thought those were two separate matters, but sure.
On the one hand, there is literally nothing about reality that suggests to me some form of intentional creation or planning.
As for prophecies, out of the top of my mind I don't recall any that have much of a clear meaning, and certainly none that were proven true and significant or that I expect to ever be.
That is something else entirely, and does not really connect to claims of immortality, or even potential immortality.Whereas Dr. Joon Yun think otherwise regarding that humans can find a cure to increase human's lifespan and to combat aging.
I don't even think much about them, truth be told. There is a logical contradiction in caring too much about so-called scriptural prophecy. All the more so for one who intends to take one's beliefs seriously.How prophecies weren't clear, Christians and Muslims were informed that Israel will be established in Jerusalem, so do you think it just happened to be so, or the prophecy wasn't clear?
Increasing human's lifespan and combating aging does not equate to immortality. It means making humans live longer, not forever.Whereas Dr. Joon Yun think otherwise regarding that humans can find a cure to increase human's lifespan and to combat aging.
That is something else entirely, and does not really connect to claims of immortality, or even potential immortality.
Nor is it a cure, but rather a treatment (or, more likely, several). Aging is not a disease. Geriatry is a legitimate medical specialty, but it does not deal with pretenses of potential immortality.
Increasing human's lifespan and combating aging does not equate to immortality. It means making humans live longer, not forever.
I don't even think much about them, truth be told. There is a logical contradiction in caring too much about so-called scriptural prophecy. All the more so for one who intends to take one's beliefs seriously.
But mostly, yes, they are unspecific or just unclear. I have a bit of background in psychology and statistics and have learned of several reasons not to think too much of them. At this point I am slightly surprised that some people still care about them.
What signs are these? I'd say the Creator is woefully incompetent in the signs and portents department, else there would be general agreement and religious unity.Except that the creator is giving us signs, not only a claim.
Increasing human's lifespan and combating aging does not equate to immortality. It means making humans live longer, not forever.
Absolutely since if none died from old age or other factors then their food supply would likely run out, plus the world would become quickly overpopulated.
Nostradamus is credited with all sorts of realized predictions, as are many other 'seers'. Anyone can make predictions, and some are sure to come true.How are they not clear? Israel was established exactly as stated, so your claim of saying not
specific and not clear can't be true, so the other option is "just happened to be so", coincidence.
I am not seeing it. Why do you think so?If scientists will think the way you do, then they'll leave everything for nature and everything will turn to be impossible.
Live forever: Scientists say they’ll extend life ‘well beyond 120’
How are they not clear? Israel was established exactly as stated,
And yet it is. I guess that makes me more reliable than the scripture?so your claim of saying not
specific and not clear can't be true,
Not at all.so the other option is "just happened to be so", coincidence.
Why is that more logical, rational, and believable, than just saying all life forms evolve to live in balance with the life around them. We eat plants and animals to live and one day we will die so that plants may feast upon our bodies and continue the circle of life? You operate under the assumption that humans are exempt from this simple circle that applies to all life. If you assume that all life lives by the same rules and dies by the same rules then human death is no different than a goldfish getting flushed. There is no goldfish heaven and there is no human heaven.
The 1000 year governmental rule of Jesus? If this is what your waiting then no wonder you believe in eternal life. You would need it to wait for something that will never happen.
Also kudos on the answer to the dinosaur question. I have heard a lot of absurd theists rationalities in my time but the "jesus will tell me when he gets here" is a new one. Pretty much the equivalent of a teenager throwing a hand in the air and saying "whatever".
I think that immortality is impossible because of Murphy's law. Whatever can happen, will happen given enough time.