What exactly is the point of promoting an idea that is often misconstrued? I guess the reason why I am questioning you as I am is because I have already tried a similar track and found that it wasn't worth the effort.
That's true. It can be more effort than it's worth.
I suppose for those who don't wish to drop the term "God" though, it's often either one of usefulness or due to linguistic influence, or in some cases, just summing up what they believe in one simple term, even if it's not one hundred percent?
For example, "I believe in a form of God" or "I believe in an All-Transcendent Transpersonal and Sapient Ground of All Being of which we are part of, but whose qualities, nature and our relationship to it, and thus consequently ourselves is far more than we actually realize" - having something which you can say that gives people a general idea often helps, I guess, as some people don't understand such concepts.
Is it better, or worse to have lots of different words for God going around, or lots of different words?
It just, effectively, boils down to semantics and personal choice in words, I guess, for better or worse, for constructive or not.
I dunno, man, what would you suggest?