From what I've seen of both, even Fox has the upper hand in objectivity compared to Alternet,Alternet certainly shows bias from time to time, but nothing compared to right-wing rabble inflaming garbage like FOX.
which isn't really news...just shrill & sloppy anti-conservative & anti-libertarian advocacy.
You may present whatever studies you wish, but I see what I see watching both sides. Moreover,I defy you to cite even one scientific study that suggests sources like Alternet dumb down their audience. Last I knew, there were five to seven such studies suggesting that FOX viewers are more poorly informed about events than viewers of other channels, including MSNBC.
I've seen many "scientific" studies which are also quite agenda laden, so I'm skeptical of mere
claims that science is on your side. But feel free to make a correlation between being "poorly
informed" & degree of bias.
Tis nothing to get miffed about.By the way, your worries that liberals are blind to the biases of various liberal-leaning outlets seems to me like a failed attempt to shift attention away from the generally much greater bias of outlets like FOX. Nice try, though. If I had nothing of substance with which to defend the FOX, Limbaugh, Breitbart, etc. Axis, even I might stoop to childishly shifting blame.
But least you didn't include Drudge in your list this time. This is progress.
Some always think the bias is on the other side, while their own has THE TRUTH.
Last edited: