I find it interesting, that people are willing to believe in the idea that all life evolved from a common ancestor, when they take circumstantial evidence, and call that objective evidence for their claim.
Yet, billions of people, including thousands of scientists, cannot see that evidence as supporting belief in that theory.
Then these same people say, they need objective evidence for the existence of demons, but can't take the circumstantial evidnce presented.
You're presenting Biblical scripture as facts in evidence rather than claims that would need independent evidence to support them.
Really?
Let's see if that is true.
I read in a couple books that when a Tsunami is imminent, the seas on the shore will, recede. I believe it. I also have confidence that the information is reliable, since it has proved to be, in the past, and the source is trustworthy.
I'm at the beach, and I start seeing the sea receding, revealing a vast amount of seabed.
I reflect on the knowledge I gained from the books, and recognize the evidence - the sea receding, as evidence of an imminent tsunami.
I start pointing to the evidence - the sea receding, as evidence of an imminent tsunami, and warning people of what they don't see.
Some people say to me, "
You idiot! Do you see a tsunami. Get off the so and so beach and leave me alone, before I go Rambo on you. You nerd!"
I digress. I'm an idiot, using a stupid book as evidence.
Is that how you see it? Really?
Taking your OP alone, the only actual evidence you present is your statements about crime and chaos in general increasing in the world. Not only is that assertion questionable depending on exactly what you're measuring and how, I question the idea that things are significantly worse that any other point in human history. The idea of there being some definitive transition point that needs a specific explanation isn't evident.
People question lots of things.
Some people are content to say, "Well i don't know why the youth are this way, or why we cannot accomplish these goal, though they seem attainable, but
I am not interested in no stupid book. Leave me alone in my stupid ignorance. If I am to die, so be it."
Regardless, changes in crime or general negative aspects of society can be and are explained by a combination of any number of different factors, which is why those things have always varied significantly, by both time and place. There is no need for there to be some additional external force causing these things. As yet unknown factors could exist of course (including, but not exclusively, Biblical demons) but the effects in themselves are not evidence of any specific new cause.
People do not understand why, as said by most.
"
the world changed"
They just live with change. After all, to them, it's life - normal.
The thing is, if we see changes at a time matching events that would significantly impact on the world, then if we ignore said events, we are simply ignoring evidence, and not being as scientific as we claim.
For example, scientists say the earth 's rotation shifts with earthquakes.
Even though they are other factors that affect earth's rotation, the event and timing of an earthquake is not ignored.
That's just an example I can think of at the moment..
The change with regard to our world, was noticed at a time when certain events, invisible to human eyes occured, but which events were known would occur, and recorded for those who "have ears to hear".
The Bible revealed
If everyone were to believe and accept this, I would not be the only most surprised man on earth. I think all the chickens would drop dead from shock.
We - Bible students, not scientists, and the world alienated from God - will recognize, and pay attention. For us, we know it means our life, and yours... but that's up to you, not me.
Anyway, your OP also claims that only a "Bible student" will be able to see and understand this, so you're not presenting comprehensive evidence at all. Note that this is not the same as scientists and dark matter since anyone is able to observe the effects and evidence around dark matter and even come to understand them to an extent. Even you express a level of understanding of the concepts of dark matter here.
The OP says clearly... at least it seems pretty clear.
Bible students recognize the increased lawlessness, and problems as evidence of demonic interference. These are signs they were instructed to expect, and look for.
So, it's a matter of knowing what to look for. If you aren't a scientist with knowledge of what to look for, you would never consider any notion of Dark Matter.
Likewise, if you are not a Bible student, and don't know what to look for, you would never give thought to the presence or influence of demons.
Thus, despite what skeptics and unbelievers say, there is evidence of demonic activity.
Just as anyone is able to observe the effects and evidence around dark matter and even come to understand them to an extent, anyone can do the same in the case of demons.
All scientists do not accept Dark Matter. The phenomenon is associated with other explanation.
All people do not accept demons. As you said, there accept other explanations for the foretold events.
So, I think you either misunderstood what the OP is saying, or this is an attempt at a strawman.
You were saying you shouldn't need to present your argument in a manner people can understand.
Where did I say that?
Now you're accepting that you do but claiming you already have?
???
The fact remains that nobody here seems to have fully understood your position, certainly not to the point of considering it viable. Again, isn't it possible that you're not being as clear as you think you are?
You don't know that, and obviously that is not true.
Maybe you might speak for yourself.
I also believe if others said the same, they would not be speaking the truth.
