One must be a bigot to claim someone isYou almost have to be a racist to think Trump is not a racist.
a racist without cromulently arguing why.
(One prolly has a really bad haircut too.)
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
One must be a bigot to claim someone isYou almost have to be a racist to think Trump is not a racist.
All those brown-skinned Central American Rapists and Murderers.But neither does having a black friend prove he's a racist.
Calling him "racist" & "anti-semite" is just what his foes love to say.
They don't offer a cogent argument with evidence.
They just all agree upon the belief....& agreement is truth, eh.
Come on.
I read more posts than anyone else here.
There's a big problem here that Trump's critics don't understand.
They're trying to distill all of what Trump is & does into a few insulting labels.
See above.So they need to make the argument that the label does indeed define him.
They haven't. Can they? If they could, they would.
A list of groups.....now that is one cromulent evidence based argument.All those brown-skinned Central American Rapists and Murderers.
The Chinese virus.
Those Muslims.
A list of groups.....now that is one cromulent evidence based argument.
<snicker>
Am I the only one who consumes broadly based news?
I wouldn't brag about that if I were you.True. Some of us actually have lives.
You people & your labels....you shout them back & forth to each other,"A few insulting labels"?
Racist
Narcissist
Pathological Liar
Womanizer
Blasphemer
Need I go on? Do you really need examples? They are out there. If you don't know that, you really need to spend a little time away from RF and maybe read an online newspaper or watch some televised coverages of his actual comments.
Still....you try to make a cogent argument by showing me a list?If you actually consumed broadly based news you would know that that is not a list of groups, it is a tiny portion of Trump's actual comments.
But but but. ... he did it first!The "Chinese virus" is a direct retaliation to China blaming Ameristan's
Army
I predicted the inevitable tu quoque by post 3. They got nuthin' with which to defend their false orange idol, so all you get is spin, bluster and a desperate attempt to change the subject to anything else. Don't be drawn.But but but. ... he did it first!
It is an infantile and dangerous response that appeals to our worst nature. We don’t need to go there.
Well, I never claimed that it was a productive response.But but but. ... he did it first!
It is an infantile and dangerous response that appeals to our worst nature. We don’t need to go there.
You totally misunderstand.I predicted the inevitable tu quoque by post 3. They got nuthin' with which to defend their false orange idol, so all you get is spin, bluster and a desperate attempt to change the subject to anything else. Don't be drawn.
No you didn’t. But nor did you condemn it as racist.Well, I never claimed that it was a productive response.
I disagree with that it's about race.No you didn’t. But nor did you condemn it as racist.
Would you now?
So you are defending the use of the term, and criticizing me for pointing out how racist it is. Good to be clear.I disagree with that it's about race.
It was his direct response to false Chinese claims that
Ameristan introduced the virus into China. The fact
that China is overwhelmingly populated with asians
is irrelevant."Chinese" is not even a race.
You got caught pushing a bogus claim.
Just admit, & move on.
While I may agree with you to some extent, Trump is far beyond "accidentally" saying a bigoted thing here and there. There is a consistent pattern with him that can't be brushed off as "well who isn't racist sometimes?"No, but it seemed a fun thing to post.
I read more posts than anyone else here.
If you know of such an argument, feel free to present
it...not just claim that it might exist somewhere.
But I do think we need to give Trump a piece of cheese.
There's a big problem here that Trump's critics don't understand.
They're trying to distill all of what Trump is & does into a few insulting labels.
This ignores the larger picture & all the details.
Is he racist? Well, who isn't in some circumstances & times.
I'm not above bigotry. Neither are you.
I see bigotry creep into posts of even the most saintly (in their own minds)
of posters on RF. Yet they wouldn't allow each other to be characterized
totally by the the label of "bigot".
So they need to make the argument that the label does indeed define him.
They haven't. Can they? If they could, they would.
Do you not even read the posts you respond to?So you are defending the use of the term, and criticizing me for pointing out how racist it is. Good to be clear.
I'll educate you a little....Btw, how do you feel about calling Covid 19 the “Kung Flu”? Will you defend or condemn that?
Yes, clearly.I suppose you're going to cry "Racism!" once gain?
It's not cromulent to say that because Trump is generally thisWhile I may agree with you to some extent, Trump is far beyond "accidentally" saying a bigoted thing here and there. There is a consistent pattern with him that can't be brushed off as "well who isn't racist sometimes?"
Hah!Yes, clearly.
I disagree with that it's about race.
It was his direct response to false Chinese claims that
Ameristan introduced the virus into China. The fact
that China is overwhelmingly populated with asians
is irrelevant."Chinese" is not even a race.
You got caught pushing a bogus claim.
Just admit, & move on.