sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Oh! So you believe that it is the Word of God? Great! Welcome to the fold, brother!Sure sojourner,sure
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Oh! So you believe that it is the Word of God? Great! Welcome to the fold, brother!Sure sojourner,sure
Let me remind you that you saidOh! So you believe that it is the Word of God? Great! Welcome to the fold, brother!
God does not lie. The Bible is not "God's own words." Therefore, ........
Again, in what capacity? No one's disagreeing that it is inaccurate in some of its historical data. That's what you're basing your diatribe on?It isn't just an opinion,it's fact bible is wrong(we prove it),really no one believes in what it says,so while being 100% accurate i say bible is incorrect.
About the Quran,why don't see it as completely accurate.(maybe you will want to reply in the quranic forum).
Apparently, it doesn't matter what I think. But it does matter what you think. You just said that the Bible is the Word of God. So, you must be a believer. Again, welcome to the fold, brother!Let me remind you that you said
And that is thing, i am sure of.
I didn't, every body could say it,so such statments will not help you.Apparently, it doesn't matter what I think. But it does matter what you think. You just said that the Bible is the Word of God. So, you must be a believer. Again, welcome to the fold, brother!
And that is a thing(what you said bible isn't god's word), i am sure of.God does not lie. The Bible is not "God's own words." Therefore, ........
Lol... My religion says Hinduism. Very different. I think you are a bit hateful towards Christianity.Nothing,i just thought you believe in the bible.
Look at your post #175. I said that I didn't believe that the Bible was God's actual word. Your response was, "Sure, Sojourner, sure." That constitutes a rebuttal to my position.I didn't, every body could say it,so such statments will not help you.
you said:
And that is a thing(what you said bible isn't god's word), i am sure of.
**bump**Again, in what capacity? No one's disagreeing that it is inaccurate in some of its historical data. That's what you're basing your diatribe on?
Just because part of its historical data is wrong is no reason to think that we don't "believe in what it says." It says exactly what it was designed to say, if you just knew how to read it properly.
So, go ahead: In what way is the Bible "incorrect?"
And be sure to use proper exegesis when you make your claims, backing them up with references, if necessary.
Thank you,but you might be conserned about the image that the hindu scriptures give to islam.Lol... My religion says Hinduism. Very different. I think you are a bit hateful towards Christianity.
You are the sort of people who give Islam a bad name.
**2nd bump****bump**
I'm still waiting for your answer, Zhakir.
What ever you say neither i do believe in your bible nor you.Look at your post #175. I said that I didn't believe that the Bible was God's actual word. Your response was, "Sure, Sojourner, sure." That constitutes a rebuttal to my position.
If my position is that the Bible is not the literal words of God, then your rebuttal must be that it, in fact, is. So, once again, welcome to the fold.
I'm sorry but you will never convince me that the Quran has any more accuracy than the Bible. Neither is 100%. Don't get me wrong, there is some good in each, but also plenty of not so good.It isn't just an opinion,it's fact bible is wrong(we prove it),really no one believes in what it says,so while being 100% accurate i say bible is incorrect.
About the Quran,why don't see it as completely accurate.(maybe you will want to reply in the quranic forum).
Oh, no you don't! You don't get off that easy. I never once said that I don't believe in the Bible. I said that I don't believe that it's literally God's words.What ever you say neither i do believe in your bible nor you.
Again, in what capacity? No one's disagreeing that it is inaccurate in some of its historical data. That's what you're basing your diatribe on?
Just because part of its historical data is wrong is no reason to think that we don't "believe in what it says." It says exactly what it was designed to say, if you just knew how to read it properly.
So, go ahead: In what way is the Bible "incorrect?"
And be sure to use proper exegesis when you make your claims, backing them up with references, if necessary.
Are there Christian believers? What do you mean by "believers?" Believers in what?Ok i'll tell, you maybe want to be the first one to reply to this thread ,which all christisans in the forum are trying to ignore.
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/christianity/79695-there-christian-believers.html
Thus, Muhammed is mentioned, as Mahāmada, in III.3.3.5-27. The passage portrays him as a dharmadūṣaka ("polluter of righteousness"), a preceptor of paiśācadharma ("ghoulish religion"), and a reincarnation of Tripurāsura, a demon whom Lord Shiva will destroy again.Thank you,but you might be conserned about the image that the hindu scriptures give to islam.
YouTube - Prophet MUHAMMAD in Hindu Scriptures
This is your exegetical proof???The theread's aim is to discuss that there is not a single human being now who believes in the bible and there are no "true christians believers" now ,and there have never been at all times.
Really....Oh, no you don't! You don't get off that easy. I never once said that I don't believe in the Bible. I said that I don't believe that it's literally God's words.
I'd be glad to talk to you if you only reply to one verseThus, Muhammed is mentioned, as Mahāmada, in III.3.3.5-27. The passage portrays him as a dharmadūṣaka ("polluter of righteousness"), a preceptor of paiśācadharma ("ghoulish religion"), and a reincarnation of Tripurāsura, a demon whom Lord Shiva will destroy again.
Bhavishya Purana - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The puranas are changed, especially this one. Bhavishya means life in my language. Mughals have invaded India, and one of their tactics was to change scriptures to convert die hard Hindus. Not to mention killing and raping and forceful conversion. Oh yeah, don't forget knocking down beautiful Hindu mandirs.
It's funny, if they break down a Mandir, nothing happens, someone makes some cartoons of Muhammed and we should all die.
Hinduism is a beautiful religion and would not give Muhammed a positive look... Hinduism is the oldest religion in the world... It's just not right...
So i should prove it's right ok,let's start with
Quran Miracles - Miracles of the Qur'an
by the you didn't prove any thing
Thank you,but you might be conserned about the image that the hindu scriptures give to islam.
YouTube - Prophet MUHAMMAD in Hindu Scriptures