• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Do All Republican Candidates Favor Insurrection?

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The Republican party is that only in name.Trump appeals to the new America who see jobs outsourced to China etc.The jobs will not come back as no one can afford to work for those wages.
With social media and artificial intelligence 2/3 of Republicans genuinely believe Trump had his victory stolen.He will probably be back as he has the money to to influence the small deciding votes.He also has business backers in the East and West so I think victory for him is highly certain.
Trump somehow managed to cozen
Magas to think he's God's chosen.
I hope that you're wrong.
But faith in him's strong.
We all could be in for a hose'n.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The Republican party is that only in name.Trump appeals to the new America who see jobs outsourced to China etc.The jobs will not come back as no one can afford to work for those wages.
With social media and artificial intelligence 2/3 of Republicans genuinely believe Trump had his victory stolen.He will probably be back as he has the money to to influence the small deciding votes.He also has business backers in the East and West so I think victory for him is highly certain.
That could be. Which is why applying the 14th Amendment would be a good thing.
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
You asked your question poorly and got mad because he used a dictionary? Are you serious? You asked "" What is your definition of insurrection?". When you ask it that way a particular dictionary definition could be the one that he uses. I can now see that you meant, and should have asked or demanded "Please define insurrection in your own words.". Your question was answered as asked.

How embarassing

The embarassment goes to where due .. that you do not understand why posting a link to a dictionary .. when asked the definition of "insurrection" .. in context .. is a big fail .. should be embarassing ..

and to claim this was an answer to the question .. fuel on the fire of embarassment .. ??

Do you seriously not understand why linking to a dictionary is a big fail ? give you a chance to redeem yourself .. perhaps I misunderstood your confusion.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The embarassment goes to where due .. that you do not understand why posting a link to a dictionary .. when asked the definition of "insurrection" .. in context .. is a big fail .. should be embarassing ..

and to claim this was an answer to the question .. fuel on the fire of embarassment .. ??

Do you seriously not understand why linking to a dictionary is a big fail ? give you a chance to redeem yourself .. perhaps I misunderstood your confusion.
It may have been what you meant to ask, but it is not what you asked. Once again:

How embarassing<sic>.
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
I posted it earlier.
Try to keep up.

What you posted was a big failure friend - speaking of keeping up -- we are still waiting for your definition of insurrection ... the one that applies in this case .. not a list of possible definitions that might apply .. as posted previously to your own embarassment.

Did you not wish to correct your error friend ?
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
And he gave you one. You didn't ask me. I am not the one that should be embarassed<sic> @Revoltingest is not the one. That would be you.

By the way, what is wrong with a dictionary definition in this case? Please try to give a rational response.
"What is wrong with a dictionary definition of insurrection" in the context of this case. Asking that question .. is the source of embarassment friend .. or at least should be.

First off .. there is nothing wrong with a dictionary definition .. your first fail ... in not realizing that a dictionary often has more than one definition.. the question is then .. Which dictionary definition is being used .. and Why.

Referring someone to a dictionary .. does not answer the question of which definition .. is the one that applies to this case.

Ding .. ding .. ding .. ding .. I hear bells somewhere .. a light with an exclam has gone off in the dark .. brightening the place up a little .. but of course if by murphy's law it happens when one is naked .. how embarassing is that.

Now that we have solved this sordid dilema .. did you want to tell us which definition of insurrection we shold be using .. and why ..
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
"What is wrong with a dictionary definition of insurrection" in the context of this case. Asking that question .. is the source of embarassment friend .. or at least should be.
Yes, but as has been explained, your context was not clear. It may have been clear to you, but it was not clear to anyone else. Here is a clue, if no one sees a problem with an answer the problem may be yours.
First off .. there is nothing wrong with a dictionary definition .. your first fail ... in not realizing that a dictionary often has more than one definition.. the question is then .. Which dictionary definition is being used .. and Why.

I see that you do not know how to use a dictionary. Yes, we all know that there are multiple definitions to a word. If you want to ask "which one" without a qualifier it is going to be the first one. That one is first since dictionaries tend to list the most common definition first. I hope that this was some help for you.
Referring someone to a dictionary .. does not answer the question of which definition .. is the one that applies to this case.

Again, without a qualifier, go the the first definition.
Ding .. ding .. ding .. ding .. I hear bells somewhere .. a light with an exclam has gone off in the dark .. brightening the place up a little .. but of course if by murphy's law it happens when one is naked .. how embarassing is that.
Wait! You mean that you are finally realizing your errors?


Now that we have solved this sordid dilema .. did you want to tell us which definition of insurrection we shold be using .. and why ..

Oh wait. You did not see your errors.

By the way, did you know that another very way to use the dictionary is to check one's posts for spelling errors? One can avoid the dilema<sic> of the embarassing<sic> result of people exclam<sicWTF?> about one's countless errors.
 
Top