"What is wrong with a dictionary definition of insurrection" in the context of this case. Asking that question .. is the source of embarassment friend .. or at least should be.
Yes, but as has been explained, your context was not clear. It may have been clear to you, but it was not clear to anyone else. Here is a clue, if no one sees a problem with an answer the problem may be yours.
First off .. there is nothing wrong with a dictionary definition .. your first fail ... in not realizing that a dictionary often has more than one definition.. the question is then .. Which dictionary definition is being used .. and Why.
I see that you do not know how to use a dictionary. Yes, we all know that there are multiple definitions to a word. If you want to ask "which one" without a qualifier it is going to be the first one. That one is first since dictionaries tend to list the most common definition first. I hope that this was some help for you.
Referring someone to a dictionary .. does not answer the question of which definition .. is the one that applies to this case.
Again, without a qualifier, go the the first definition.
Ding .. ding .. ding .. ding .. I hear bells somewhere .. a light with an exclam has gone off in the dark .. brightening the place up a little .. but of course if by murphy's law it happens when one is naked .. how embarassing is that.
Wait! You mean that you are finally realizing your errors?
Now that we have solved this sordid dilema .. did you want to tell us which definition of insurrection we shold be using .. and why ..
Oh wait. You did not see your errors.
By the way, did you know that another very way to use the dictionary is to check one's posts for spelling errors? One can avoid the dilema<sic> of the embarassing<sic> result of people exclam<sicWTF?> about one's countless errors.