Do All Republican Candidates Favor Insurrection?

[LuisDantas]

Incredible how resilient QAnon talk is... well despite itself.

 

[Colt]

https://www.axios.com/2023/12/29/haley-pardon-trump-as-president

Excerpted....
Why it matters: Trump currently faces 87 felony charges across Florida, New York and Georgia over allegations that he tried to overturn 2020 election results, interfered in the election, mishandled classified materials and paid a porn star hush money.

• Haley joins her fellow Republicans Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy in signaling support for a possible pardon for Trump.

4 years of a very real attempt to overturn the 2016 election by corrupting our justice system could be seen as a slow "insurrection" by people who could not face the fact that their candidate sucked so bad that Donal freaking Trump was able to win the presidency!

The same Fed.gov run by the (D) party could surely find any number of charges to take YOU to court for if they wanted to!

 

[Subduction Zone]

One can barely manage nonsensical 2 word response ... and neither can manage to define insurrection as per the Capital Protest .. but, somehow this is my failure .. Har har har

Stuck Lads ? Whats wrong other complete lack of argument ? .. have ye no ability to support your claim at all ? .. such that you are unable even to try any longer .. having a bad fail experience on previous attempt ..

The failure is yours, as has been explained to you by more than one person. If you cannot understand that is your problem.

 

[Subduction Zone]

View attachment 86961
4 years of a very real attempt to overturn the 2016 election by corrupting our justice system could be seen as a slow "insurrection" by people who could not face the fact that their candidate sucked so bad that Donal freaking Trump was able to win the presidency!

The same Fed.gov run by the (D) party could surely find any number of charges to take YOU to court for if they wanted to!

But you know that never happened. Your fantasies are not facts.

 

[Revoltingest]

View attachment 86961
4 years of a very real attempt to overturn the 2016 election by corrupting our justice system could be seen as a slow "insurrection" by people who could not face the fact that their candidate sucked so bad that Donal freaking Trump was able to win the presidency!

The same Fed.gov run by the (D) party could surely find any number of charges to take YOU to court for if they wanted to!

I don't recall Hillary's dishonest antics rising to the
criminal level of Donald's. But even if hers were,
such whataboutism doesn't excuse his treason.

Trump is so horrible that he's far worse
than even Joe Biden. Now that is bad.

 

[Twilight Hue]

The charges you mention were based on words and not actual deeds. Did Pence over turn the election? No. Did Trump prosecute any secretaries of state? No.

The Left always complains how Trump lies, and now wants to believes all Trump's words one one day, has long legs. Biden and Obama spied on candidate Trump, in a way worse than Nixon, They used the FBI and CIA, under the excuse of the Russian Collusion scam. Nobody has denied the action that spying did occur This happened. There was more than a threat to spy. However, Biden and company tried to deny the action with words, until caught; FISA so others take the fall. Nothing happened even to those crooks. I was waiting for Nixon to pass the torch. Actions speak louder than words. Let us speak of tangible things and not just idle threats and pretend deeds threatened, but just things that actually happened. You will never get the death penalty for saying you will kill someone if they are still around without a scratch; words mean less than actions if you are rooted in reality

As far as the so called "insurrection", what bothers me, is how ill planned and wimpy it was. I m not saying I wanted an insurrection but why was it so limp for an insurrection? We should call it an E.D-surrection Doesn't an insurrection have more gusto?

Trump, as both a business leader and as President was a workoholic and he would work his staff hard. The Government workers, who you cannot fire, were not used to his pace, so he went thought staff like socks. If he had been planning an insurrection, it would have be the best insurrection and not something so limp. Trump was on good terms with the Military, but not with the CIA and FBI. Why not a use some of those trained people who were loyal? Why use untrained and ill equipped civilians?

The insurrections of the summer of 2020, under the guise of racial riots, were well planned, well stocked, and well executed over many cities and nobody got punished. You do not think that Trump, could have done that with only one building in one city, if he had recruited the right people to make it work? There was little Capital defense even with a warning. Why so wimpy all ways?

Do you think anyone would purposely plan such a wimpy insurrection, that was guaranteed to fail, due to poor planning, lack of resources and the improper personnel, all with no escape plans, knowing you will be held accountable, even if you did not do it? This day was too dumbed down to be the work of Trump, or any Trump supporting spooks in the Military.

This why I believe this was a setup, since not a single crooked politician broke a nail or missed lunch. The insurrection of the summer of 2020 was far more scary and did more damage and nobody was punished. That is what you expected of better planning. The real insurrection by the pro's was during the summer. That is what I would have expected if Trump went coco had the mind to do this; called in the experts, like the Democrats did to secure and take the heat buffering the brass.

One last thing Trump was never formally charge with Insurrection, including by the jan 6, committee. The mantra you speak is similar to the fake news charge of collusion in 2016. How many sang that? It is political game for gullible people. It is deigned for zero salary windmill fighters.

Not a single leftist will ever be able to explain that other than spouting the usual classic redundant response that all them thar republican-blicans are all corrupt and us haughty tauty Democrats are the ultimate great moral heroes on our majestic mounts to save the day like Dudley Do-Right.

 

[Twilight Hue]

I don't recall Hillary's dishonest antics rising to the
criminal level of Donald's. But even if hers were,
such whataboutism doesn't excuse his treason.

Trump is so horrible that he's far worse
than even Joe Biden. Now that is bad.

Even I don't think Joe Biden is all that bad, at least in his present dementia ridden state, but then again he's a puppet president that clearly is easily controlled and guided behind the scene making his unelected handlers the worst ones than Trump is as they're the ones who are really controlling the show while they pulled the strings of their POTUS puppet.

Biden is a marionette.

 

[Laniakea]

I don't recall Hillary's dishonest antics rising to the
criminal level of Donald's. But even if hers were,
such whataboutism doesn't excuse his treason.

Not being convicted of a crime doesn't mean her antics weren't criminal.

Trump is so horrible that he's far worse
than even Joe Biden. Now that is bad.

You provide no evidence of this.

 

[Sargonski]

The failure is yours, as has been explained to you by more than one person. If you cannot understand that is your problem.

Name calling and Ad Hom Fallacy as a deflection tactic, does not change the fact that you have failed to provide a definition for insurrection .. and thus your claim that the Trump is guilty of insurrection is unsupported nonsense.

 

[Revoltingest]

Even I don't think Joe Biden is all that bad, at least in his present dementia ridden state...

Neither is the sharpest tool in the shed.
Trump is losing it too.

...but then again he's a puppet president that clearly is easily controlled and guided behind the scene making his unelected handlers the worst ones than Trump is as they're the ones who are really controlling the show while they pulled the strings of their POTUS puppet.

Biden is a marionette.

That must be fun to believe.
The evidence you've presented is hard to counter.

 

[Revoltingest]

Not being convicted of a crime doesn't mean her antics weren't criminal.

I've not defended her.
Only objected to your criticism of her
as an excuse for Trump's treason.

You provide no evidence of this.

Evidence is so obvious that I thought even
you would recognize it, eg, his attempted
coup, his insurrection, his threat to persecute
political rivals, & his argument that he can
legally assassinate those rivals.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Name calling and Ad Hom Fallacy as a deflection tactic, does not change the fact that you have failed to provide a definition for insurrection .. and thus your claim that the Trump is guilty of insurrection is unsupported nonsense.

No deflection. No name calling. No ad hom. Try again.

 

[Laniakea]

I've not defended her.
Only objected to your criticism of her
as an excuse for Trump's treason.

Evidence is so obvious that I thought even
you would recognize it, eg, his attempted
coup, his insurrection, his threat to persecute
political rivals, & his argument that he can
legally assassinate those rivals.

Saying, it's "so obvious" isn't providing evidence. So far, it's just your words.

 

[Revoltingest]

Saying, it's "so obvious" isn't providing evidence. So far, it's just your words.

It's obvious to anyone not belonging to Trump's cult.
Just read news, eg, the insurrection, the fake electors,
ordering Pence to over-turn the election, etc.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It's obvious to anyone not belonging to Trump's cult.
Just read news, eg, the insurrection, the fake electors,
ordering Pence to over-turn the election, etc.

Sorry, ostrich defense mode is on.

 

[Revoltingest]

Sorry, ostrich defense mode is on.

That's what I hear from Magas IRL, ie,
if they're even aware of the problems,
they dismiss or deny.

 

[Sargonski]

No deflection. No name calling. No ad hom. Try again.

Of course you were defelecting -- as once again you failed to provide a definition of insurrection that applies .. and thus your claim that Trump is guilty of insurrection remains unsubstantiated nonsense.

 

[Laniakea]

It's obvious to anyone not belonging to Trump's cult.
Just read news, eg, the insurrection, the fake electors,
ordering Pence to over-turn the election, etc.

If it were so obvious, you would have no problem providing documented evidence from a reliable source. However, you seem to be having some trouble providing any. I wonder why that is.

 

[Revoltingest]

If it were so obvious....

See...you're immune to even mainstream news.
Powerful the Maga cult is.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Of course you were defelecting -- as once again you failed to provide a definition of insurrection that applies .. and thus your claim that Trump is guilty of insurrection remains unsubstantiated nonsense.

No, I did provide a definition, but you had your ostrich defense going.

And it does not matter. @Revoltingest provided a perfectly good definition.


You need to shake the effects of your TDS.