• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Do All Republican Candidates Favor Insurrection?

Laniakea

Not of this world
Wrong again. Even you know that drunk driving is wrong (I hope). It is illegal. But drunk driving is not a criminal term. The same applies to the insurrection.
How many times has this been explained to you in one form or another?
I give up! How many times has it been explained?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
LMAO! Well, now you know how it feels to deal with someone doing that! :p
Oh I deal with people like you all of the time. You should try to learn what is and what is not a reliable source. There are tools out there to help you. This source not only tells you the bias of various sources. It also tells you whether they are reliable or not and if not how they have failed in the past:


Also, it helps a lot if you can find a source that is on the opposite side that you are on that agrees with you. So even though you are going to disagree with left leaning CNN with only a moderately factual rating, it can be very useful if they confirm your claims:


If you want a source that you can trust you are going to be hard pressed to find someone more reliable than Reuters. They are almost dead center politically and have a very high credibility rating:

 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
It is. I responded to you and you ignored it. Your claim might be valid if this was your first time, but you have a history of doing this.

You did not respond to me with a definition of insurrection and rational as to why that definition is the proper one to use .. and thus your claim that Donald was guilty of such crime is false.

You keep deflecting from providing this definition by claiming that you have provided previously. If this is true then give the post number in which you provided this definition and explanation as promised.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member

Sorry, but you can't wish away Trump's abject stupidity.

It's not whataboutism when you're comparing mental cognition.
In this last season of "Fargo", the story was set in 2019.
At one point, the billionaire (Jennifer Jason Leigh) needed
a service from government. She directed her staff to
call the "orange idiot". That singular passing reference
was the only one about him.
I like the understated criticism.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
In this last season of "Fargo", the story was set in 2019.
At one point, the billionaire (Jennifer Jason Leigh) needed
a service from government. She directed her staff to
call the "orange idiot". That singular passing reference
was the only one about him.
I like the understated criticism.
I'm not familiar with the show, but considering what you described, I suspected that someone would be pissed off about it. I googled it, and sure enough, conservatives have called Fargo a "woke show".
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm not familiar with the show, but considering what you described, I suspected that someone would be pissed off about it. I googled it, and sure enough, conservatives have called Fargo a "woke show".
You'd enjoy Fargo, especially this last season.
Consider that most cromulent positive review,
ie, that Magas hate it, & call it "woke".
Watch it.
You'll thank me.
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
Provide a legal definition first.
Wrong again. Even you know that drunk driving is wrong (I hope). It is illegal. But drunk driving is not a criminal term. The same applies to the insurrection.
How many times has this been explained to you in one form or another?

What part of .. "Provide the definition of insurrection you are using" .. are you having trouble understanding ? your comparison to drunk driving completel nonsense .. drunk driving is a crime .. and yes it is a criminal term but who cares whether the term is criminal or not .. and what a silly thing to say.

Insurrection is a crime. Whether or not the word insurrectin is a "criminal term" does not make the slightest bit of difference to your failed claim that Trump actions were insurrection .. and your failure to provide even what definition of insurrection you are using.

Except that nobody has condoned or tried to justify the violence and vandalism, nor were the protests against police misconduct an attempt to defy democracy.
.. and they certainly was not an "Insurrection" .. of the "Civil War" kind .. an armed group with military support trying to take over the Gov't/Nation. Only a 3rd world Kangaroo show would claim such.
 
Last edited:

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
That was enuf to inspire skipping the rest.

The cry of the lost :) -- do you have no comment on the topic friend ? - are you in the right room ? we were looking for your definition of insurrection .. and some explanation why you figure that is the one that applies to the Capital Protest.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
What part of .. "Provide the definition of insurrection you are using" .. are you having trouble understanding ? your comparison to drunk driving completel nonsense .. drunk driving is a crime .. and yes it is a criminal term but who cares whether the term is criminal or not .. and what a silly thing to say.

Insurrection is a crime. Whether or not the word insurrectin is a "criminal term" does not make the slightest bit of difference to your failed claim that Trump actions were insurrection .. and your failure to provide even what definition of insurrection you are using.


.. and they certainly was not an "Insurrection" .. of the "Civil War" kind .. an armed group with military support trying to take over the Gov't/Nation. Only a 3rd world Kangaroo show would claim such.
Shouldn't intent matter? A pitiful, doomed to fail attempt is still an attempt. If overturning the election wasn't their intent, then what was?
 

JIMMY12345

Active Member
He's acknowledged as a president and is interred at Hollywood Cemetery in Richmond Virginia along with two other National presidents buried there.

Maybe if you have lived here in the states instead of Brazil you would have known that.

No.The majority of Republicans are clean honest people with spaniels who would not dream of hurting a fly.
The fact that social media supplies DISINFORMATION direct to them so they do not have the complete facts is more the problem.

ps After George Bush 1 Republicanism died.Now reincarnated as Trumpism.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Sounds like clear observation to me.
Watch this, if you can handle it:
A YouTube compilation of Biden gaffes is supposed to show, "Even I don't think Joe Biden is all that bad, at least in his present dementia ridden state, but then again he's a puppet president that clearly is easily controlled and guided behind the scene making his unelected handlers the worst ones than Trump is as they're the ones who are really controlling the show while they pulled the strings of their POTUS puppet.

Biden is a marionette."


???

Biden has been gaffing for decades. It's not some new thing that's indicative of mental decline. So did George Bush. And so does Trump. If that's a sign of being a marionette, then they all are, I guess. :shrug:
 
Top