Draka calm down, we are friends here. Holdem and I have discussed this in length, and have come to an agreemant between each other about this. I will go over what I said with him if I can summarize it.
You are correct 100% that a label of a christian, or baptist, or muslim, or aboriginal, are all very specific to the climate in which they bread readily. I do not dispute that. I know some will, but they just don't have any common sense.
The problem with your view point is the bible (not denominations or church institutions) teaches that God will save someone even if they are not exposed to the bible. For example, if a boy in India is at his respective lesson for the day for Hinduism, he may be thinking about flying a kite, often as boys do in a service of their religion. However the bible teaches that as long as an individual has the inherant laws of God on their heart, these individuals are capable of salvation to heaven.
So this child in Indian if he has the laws in his heart, even though he is studying or being exposed to another religion, he can still be saved. Only God knows our hearts, and that is how he saves, at least according to the bible.
Now, all I am asking you to do, is to make sure when you are positioning yourself for the point you are making, do so by not saying it is against the bible.
I make it a GREAT point to distibguish the bible and ANY church claiming to teach the bible.
By this reasoning, you should clearly see all people have an equal chance to be saved by the God of the bible. Even an aborignal in the wilderness or desert.