Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don’t think they have any or they need/ed one.
Well sometimes strange things do happen in this world, in case they have.
Please name such scripture and the name of the renowned religion which belongs to them, the sources as to how it got authored, its being secure till our times and its usefulness when it was written/compiled/authored and suitability in our present age.
Thread open to everybody belonging to religion and no-religion.
Regards
Some treat "The God Delusion" as scripture [that's a joke], but no they don't and it's kind of an absurd question. Atheism is the lack of belief in gods, that's all. No scripture needed.I don’t think they have any or they need/ed one.
Well sometimes strange things do happen in this world, in case they have.
Please name such scripture and the name of the renowned religion which belongs to them, the sources as to how it got authored, its being secure till our times and its usefulness when it was written/compiled/authored and suitability in our present age.
Thread open to everybody belonging to religion and no-religion.
Regards
A very good thing to ask.I have stories and quotations I'm drawn to. But I use those quotes to explain my beliefs, I don't pattern my beliefs based on those quotes. Maybe that's an important distinction. Not sure.
Some treat "The God Delusion" as scripture [that's a joke],
Christianity has a copy-right on "I AM!", they think it is the name of their G-d. So one should use it with care. Right?Green Eggs and Ham. Sam says "I AM!"
Yes!I have stories and quotations I'm drawn to. But I use those quotes to explain my beliefs, I don't pattern my beliefs based on those quotes. Maybe that's an important distinction. Not sure.
If Buddha had belonged to Atheism/Agnosticism/Skepticism/Humanism/Secularism or would have wanted to be his follower as such, they wouldn't have needed any scripture from Buddha, and Buddha would have left none. The existence of a scripture in a religion itself is proof that they don't belong to Atheism/Agnosticism/Skepticism/Humanism/Secularism.Those are not religions though so of course there is no scripture. Unless you include some branches of Buddhism and Jainism, which are atheist/agnostic but count as religions.
Scripts are for followers, Buddha didn't need them. It's the words of Buddha that make the ideas atheistic agnostic skeptic secular. What followers do with it is on them.If Buddha had belonged to Atheism/Agnosticism/Skepticism/Humanism/Secularism or would have wanted to be his follower as such, they wouldn't have needed any scripture from Buddha, and Buddha would have left none. The existence of a scripture in a religion itself is proof that they don't belong to Atheism/Agnosticism/Skepticism/Humanism/Secularism.
Regards
That makes no sense.If Buddha had belonged to Atheism/Agnosticism/Skepticism/Humanism/Secularism or would have wanted to be his follower as such, they wouldn't have needed any scripture from Buddha, and Buddha would have left none. The existence of a scripture in a religion itself is proof that they don't belong to Atheism/Agnosticism/Skepticism/Humanism/Secularism.
Regards
If Buddha had belonged to Atheism/Agnosticism/Skepticism/Humanism/Secularism or would have wanted to be his follower as such, they wouldn't have needed any scripture from Buddha, and Buddha would have left none. The existence of a scripture in a religion itself is proof that they don't belong to Atheism/Agnosticism/Skepticism/Humanism/Secularism.
Regards
Scripts are for followers, Buddha didn't need them. It's the words of Buddha that make the ideas atheistic agnostic skeptic secular. What followers do with it is on them.
But not all the written works of all religions. Any holy and sacred writing from a religion qualifies as scripture."Scripture" would be entirely the wrong word to use. Scripture is the wrong word to use in describing the written works that come out of many other religions as well.
That doesn't really concern me. The words attributed to Buddha are atheistic and skeptical in nature.Buddha left no words in writing? None, never. He did not dictate anything to anyone. No, never, no . Right? Please
Regards
But not all the written works of all religions. Any holy and sacred writing from a religion qualifies as scripture.