Wirey
Fartist
No: religious/cultural/racial purity is not at all the point. Continuity and threats to continuity is the point.
If your race/culture/religion will dissapear unless isolated, it isn't fit to survive anyway.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No: religious/cultural/racial purity is not at all the point. Continuity and threats to continuity is the point.
Oh, calm down.
All believers must face the reality that others will find fault with some aspects of the faith/culture.
After all, you've little respect for me & my loony beliefs, & you've no hesitation in stating it (again
& again). But you want all of yours held sacred by those who disagree? It ain't happening.
I have to fruball that.
She is no ally of mine.Big surprise!
If your race/culture/religion will dissapear unless isolated, it isn't fit to survive anyway.
She is no ally of mine.
She even sent a dead fish with the frubie.
If your race/culture/religion will dissapear unless isolated, it isn't fit to survive anyway.
It was so rank that it wasn't even useful for haggis.Is it fresh at least? Can you cook a good fish haggis?
Do you realize what you're saying? Any race/culture/religion will disappear if it isn't isolated. The ones that have lesser members (such as Judaism) will only disappear faster.
Being against intermarriage is our way of making sure it doesn't. It is what has helped us survive until today, and what will help us survive tomorrow. Judaism's "fitness" for survival is in fact trying to minimize assimilation.
I used to monitor a very famous white supremacist forum that shall remain nameless (name had to do with the weather). And it was the belief of many of them that white people shouldn't intermarry because if they did the entire white race would be jeopardized and would disappear. How is this different from them?
You are correlating White Supremacy with Jewish preferences on marriage ? Really ?
Aye, I agree....even though it might seem to contradict my posts.I don't have a problem with Levite wanting to maintain a close-knit tradition. He hates to see his group's historic traditions watered down to near meaninglessness.
He's not against anyone else and is not a bigot in my view.
I am asking how is Jewish anti-miscegenation different from White anti-miscegenation?
I am asking how is Jewish anti-miscegenation different from White anti-miscegenation?
Really? Anyone can become Jewish. No one can "become" white.It's the same.
I used to monitor a very famous white supremacist forum that shall remain nameless (name had to do with the weather). And it was the belief of many of them that white people shouldn't intermarry because if they did the entire white race would be jeopardized and would disappear. How is this different from them?
It's the same.
I posted a link that says that 71% of non-Conservative and Orthodox Jews intermarry.
Many of the Jews in this forum are extremists.
A Staff told me that he thinks my views are not mainstream Jewish. As a reform Jew, my views are much more mainstream than the Conservative and Orthodox posters.
Do you realize what you're saying? Any race/culture/religion will disappear if it isn't isolated. The ones that have lesser members (such as Judaism) will only disappear faster.
Being against intermarriage is our way of making sure it doesn't. It is what has helped us survive until today, and what will help us survive tomorrow. Judaism's "fitness" for survival is in fact trying to minimize assimilation.
You know going full social darwinism on us usually puts us in a bad situation.
I thought Judaism was a belief system. So the Nazi's were right when they spoke of 'Jewish blood'?