Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
The order of a snowflake does not.The order of a car has a designer. The order of a house has a builder.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The order of a snowflake does not.The order of a car has a designer. The order of a house has a builder.
Why would a mind be required?
It seems to be a very good explanation of exactly that.
And order does not imply a deity.
I have been a research mathematician for 35 years. I have a pretty good idea what math consists of.
How do you know that? Why is the order of the universe an exception?And the order of nature does not. OK.
Why?The order of a snowflake does not.
How do you know that? Why is the order of the universe an exception?
I think that you have it backwards. There are all sorts of observations of order without an obvious creator. The items that require a creator are the exception and not the rule.How do you know that? Why is the order of the universe an exception?
A mind would be required for the same reason that a drawing has a drawer who had a mind.
Where did the laws of nature come from that allow music to exist?
The order of laws requires lawmakers who made those laws. Where did the universe originate from that math is used to describe it?
Why would one assume that a creator is needed? We can see snowflakes form on their own all of the time. We even have a good understanding of the complex chemical and physical reactions that cause them to be formed. There is no god in the explanation.Why?
There is plenty of evidence. You choose to ignore it.It isn't. The things created by humans are the exception. The vast majority of the universe has no creator in evidence. Only those few things on Earth that were created by humans or other animals have any evidence of having a creator.
WE are the exception.
I don't assume a creator is needed. I see that a creator is needed.Why would one assume that a creator is needed? We can see snowflakes form on their own all of the time. We even have a good understanding of the complex chemical and physical reactions that cause them to be formed. There is no god in the explanation.
And a lot of junk beliefs are comforting, like, in my opinion, the belief in a deity.
Why would that require a creator, as opposed to simply having ordered laws of nature?
You make the jump from the existence of order to the existence of a God. That is precisely the jump that I disagree with.
And yes, the water comes together to form snow on its own. No intelligence is required to guide it.
I think that harmony was important in God's creation. Music appears to be a gift for us, perhaps to enjoy, perhaps to understand how the universe works. Maybe both.
You are misrepresenting the atheist position. Believing that there is no god is not required.
Once again we have taste buds to detect foods that are not healthy to eat. That is why they exist. And "plants" existed for over a billion years before actual animals came along. I would suggest that you try to learn a little bit. Oxygen producing organisms were some of the first to exist. Oxygen was a waste product. The atmosphere did not have oxygen in the molecular form because it was too reactive. It took a long long time to even get the dissolved iron in sea water from the Fe+2 state to the Fe+3 state. Fe+2 is water soluble. Fe+3 is not. When life first began kicking out massive amounts of O2 there was a result that we can still see today:
That hole is man made. They are going after the byproduct of early life. Dissolved O2 in sea water reacted with Fe+2 for over a billion years. Today's open pit iron mines are the result. Animal life was not needed by plant life. The atmosphere used to have what would be a poisonous amount of CO2 in it for animal life.
Why would natural laws need God if they are self-existing?
Sounds like two different notions. Now, how do we decide which, if either, is correct? What *tests* can be done?
By the way, what does 'sinful nature' mean?
That was not his argument. Please reread it.
And why is there a need for a savior? The idea of someone else suffering for an imagined slight does not make much sense.
I am just beginning to research and focus on this idea. So I don't really understand much yet. And I have no background in music, theory or practice. I have been shown over the past ten years (extremely slowly) and especially over the last two months. I am beginning to understand. There are musical ratios in DNA, in the platonic solids(among other geometry) in the solar system, in the human body. A real good place to start if you are really interested, is to Google "interference theory" there are many articles at the website, and a free ebook on pdf. It is truly the most fascinating thing I've ever read about.Apart from showing that there is a Creator how does music help us understand how the universe works?
And the order of nature does not. OK.
Both of your examples were things made by humans. It seems that only human created things have creators.
The order of a snowflake does not.
There is plenty of evidence. You choose to ignore it.