Well my friend, I hope you don't put much trust in certain scientific disciplines, because several key theories that seem designed to bring theories of the universes origins back to the sterile and exclusionary halls (labyrinths?) of science. These theories of how the universe began (it didn't begin, its eternal they say) do not contain even one theistic implication! In fact they even seem to gleefully conclude God is not needed to explain stuff...(they hope) Well well I thought the first time I read Hawkins new theory that eliminates Gid, God or anything remotely metaphysical. However one of the most reverred new theory of a godless creation is the MWI. The easiest way to highlight whats wrong with this theory is that iy is a freakin' silly piece of crap that insults our intelligence. Yes I am speaking of the many worlds interpretation/theory. I cant candy coat that awful bit of anti-wisdom! Whoever said excreta logs are polish resistant must of been thinking that the MWI looks like a log of excreta. The theory ijs not fixable, just like stupid isn't fixable. really all kidding aside, the MWI requires massive faith to believe. Want an example of an MWI infearance? Here goes, according to the MWI every conceivable or imaginable event or thing, everything and I mean everything like Dalmer and ted bundy get married after they are raised from the dead not only can happen they MUST happen. So my friend science tells us evertthing will sooner or later happen. Oh Yesssss, if thre MWI is correct you just might get to see a real tooth fairy and that freakin' Goose! You will believe in all those childhood apparitions and others exist! well, thats the truth according to SCIENCE ! Yeah give me some more of that stuff! Really now, those naive souls that measure their own reality (and sanity I suspect) from what the SCIENTIFIC tells them shouldn't beat up on me I and other Christians that mold their reality from the absolute rock of Gids/Gods truth.
What does that have anything to do with my (stolen) quote "I don't believe in God because I don't believe in Mother Goose"?
Can you expand on that a bit?
How can I compress that? Probably the most comprssed definition of phylosophical or metaphysical naturalism is the rejection of any form of teleology. There are no whys in naturalism, only hows.
Do you mean Z Ibrahimovic? If yes, Isn't he catholic? Lol, too bad
I thought he was a Muslim, as the Bosnian origin and the name suggest. Or atheist, as his citizenship suggests. I might be wrong, tho.
God bless this forum and those killed in the alternative lifestyle nightclub shooting by a radical Islamic fool~
*EDIT*
Ciao
- viole
Last edited by a moderator: