sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
Are you suggesting they don't?Yes. I also believe four-leaf clovers bring good luck...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are you suggesting they don't?Yes. I also believe four-leaf clovers bring good luck...
The New Testament (maybe Matthew) says that a wicked and adulterous generation seeks after a sign. Now, I'm not saying that we aren't a wicked and adulterous generation, but the Bible says all we need is the sign of Jonah who spent three days and three nights in the belly of a whale. This points to Christ which is the only miracle we really need.
Yes, no , maybe so?
Wish I could edit this and start a poll.
I believe that after so many miracles and yet still so much unbelief, that God just threw His hands up in exasperation and said, "Fine, have it your way."Christ (no insult intended) lived over 2,000 years ago. We only have written records of his miracle just as Jonah and Moses. All are no different (in context not importance). He should not have been the last miracle as if people today should only need faith while the disciples didnt take for granted jesus actual miracles but it nutured their faith in him.
Seeing miracles doesnt mean one doesnt have faith. I have faith my ancestors exist And I have paper work to proove it. I know because I am here and because of my family oral history. I trust/have faith because of the "physical" and spiritual interactions with my family and knowledge I learned from books and nowadays internet.
Likewise with miracles 2000 years ago. They nurtured a believers walk.
Why would christians think we only need faith when "only" 2000 jesus followers has it all? The whole shabang.
I know my ancestors exist from all my senses. I dont depend on just one.
What makes you think it was parted at all?
Just what I said. Why are you convinced that the event happened at all, regardless of who it's attributed to?What do you mean?
Just what I said. Why are you convinced that the event happened at all, regardless of who it's attributed to?
Did god parted the red sea through moses?
If not, why was Moses necessary to part it?
Remember, in the Biblical account, pharaoh had a lot of problems because he did not heed warnings. There are the statements that God hardened pharaoh's heart.The real question is: Do we really believe the egyptians were so stupid to follow the Jews once their God allegedely managed to part waters to let them through?
Ciao
- viole
G-d selected Moses. He was our leader at that time.
Why would this imply that it actually happened?Much the same as any historical event, it's recorded in the Tanakh and our Oral history.
That is clever of you to say that because I also wondered how they could be so stupid as to pursue Israel after all those plagues or not let them go after the first few.The real question is: Do we really believe the egyptians were so stupid to follow the Jews once their God allegedely managed to part waters to let them through?
Ciao
- viole
The real question is: Do we really believe the egyptians were so stupid to follow the Jews once their God allegedely managed to part waters to let them through?
I'll rephrase the question. Did God part the red sea for the ancient Israelites to part?Moses was needed as god selected him. God parted the red sea but why take out Moses in that answer?
Im a part or my mother. Although her actions are separate than mind, through her, I live and so far on back. So cant separate my actions from my mothers.
Likewise, Id assume the same for Moses. I dont believe Moses (therefore god) parted the red sea. I do believe believers take the bible literally. Yet, in the NT (case in point; I know it isnt your faith) Jesus always said he did things by faith his his father. They were inseperable. Likewise Moses.
So I think its a valid question, did Moses part the red sea. Moses did because of god. But that depends on what one believes.
My point: just saying Moses did part the red sea according to scripture since god is the source and Moses did the action.
Yes but still, who would be so loyal to fearlessly and recklessly obey Pharoah after repeatedly He was proven to be an unreliable, pitiful, and a worthless "God".Need we ask after 10 plagues didn't do the trick. Some people are just stubborn as.....Pharaoh viewed himself as a god so he wasn't going to allow Israel's God to make him look bad and take his slaves away.....who would make his mud bricks?
I'll rephrase the question. Did God part the red sea for the ancient Israelites to part?
Yes Moses did nothing.
According to the story, the reason Pharaoh wouldn't let the Israelites go was that God had hardened his heart. He was only stubborn because God made him stubborn.Need we ask after 10 plagues didn't do the trick. Some people are just stubborn as.....Pharaoh viewed himself as a god so he wasn't going to allow Israel's God to make him look bad and take his slaves away.....who would make his mud bricks?