Super Universe
Defender of God
Dude.
I'm fifty years old. Just 50. Only 50. Yet...50. So what?
Your continued evasion stands--as uncomfortably recorded--within this forum...all ad hominem allusions and insinuations not withstanding.
Let's recall for your own benefit that you instigated this thread, and proposed the OP question.
Again, for the third time, I tell you that your (prepositionally) challenging inquiry HAS been ANSWERED...and you have both deflected and ignored that consummately provided answer henceforth...most inelegantly.
Will you not answer, or can you not?
Inquiring minds and lurkers would like to know...
Whither shall we look to the validations of your proffered insights and wisdom?
In your accumulated years?
In your unique insights?
In your tactical implementations of evasion and escape?
Within some archaic texts of mixed metaphors and insistent claims of informed "knowledge?
What feeds your ego of certainty and insistence? What?
So far, the substance of you position seems to be rooted within the self-serving assertion that you "know better" than the rest of us wayward fools and children.
Perhaps that is so...perhaps not.
As Missourians are famously noted to say..."Don't tell me, show me."
C'mon, Mister "Super Universe"...enlighten us all with your sage wisdoms and enlightened truths begat of the years of experience and deliverance, available to only but the most aged and tested of we mortal humans...like you.
Be the prophet of unique revelation you were born to sell to the masses of the great unwashed, young and old alike.
Or, in the meantime, perhaps you might muster the temerity and courage to succinctly answer the lesser "trivialties" of those most discomfiting challenges upon the claims you espouse as truth, especially amongst us most severely unenlightened mortals?
I promise that I won't characterize you as "too old" to appreciate or understand five decades of life experience as exemplar for myself. I promise that I will only fairly criticize the value/merit of the arguments you present as being either supportive, or as validation of, the "truths" you care to share as being undeniable and universal in application and interpretation.
What's left to settle? What do you still want to debate? You don't have to believe. Get over it.
I "instigated" this thread? Hehe... So that is an instigation now?
From what I remember, no one answered the question sufficiently. All I got was "I see no reason to believe" as if you need absolute proof for everything when there are so many things that you trust (cars, homes, bridges, airplanes, gravity, food, people...) without knowing the full background of.
I would be a sorry sort if I felt that I had to validate myself to you. In the grand scheme of things, who are you? In the ungrand scheme of things, who are you? Zero is still zero regardless of the changing weather.