mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
90% certain. That is still not completely certain.
Complete certainty requires faith. That's not my style.
So I can't work. What now?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
90% certain. That is still not completely certain.
Complete certainty requires faith. That's not my style.
I trust my unconscious to act according to its nature and my conscious mind to act according to its nature.
If one hasn't, there is still no reason to believe.
So it seems there is never a reason to believe.
So I can't work. What now?
I trust my unconscious to act according to its nature and my conscious mind to act according to its nature.
Do you need someone else to decide that for you?
And yet there’s no shortage of believers. How is it that you feel qualified to pronounce that they all believe without reason? That seems rather unreasonable to me.
It is not a decision in me. It is my nature. You are such a normie at times.
Just last night I had a dream that I was traveling with my girlfriend and we met up with some other couple. We ended up backstage at a concert, and at some point there were the White Stripes warming up. They ended up not being the band that performed. Why were they in my dream and not even playing at the concert? I'm not really a fan of theirs. Weird. I can tell you I didn't interact with this other couple as we humans do with other actual people in every day life, nor with the White Stripes.Do we, though?
You interact with things in your dreams. Do these dream things exist?
So if I take a hammer and hit your left foot with it the existence of the hammer and your left foor being hit is just "a case of rationalism in philosophy and in effect is no different than say God"? You're just going to chose to ignore the agony of a broken left foot, and not bother going to a hospital? But hey, hospitals are just "a concept is a case of rationalism in philosophy and in effect is no different than say God", so why bother going?The problem is that existence as a concept is a case of rationalism in philosophy and in effect is no different than say God. You can't point to either.
Really, so obtaining a bottle is all that's involved in getting three wishes granted by a genie? I need to go raid my glass recycling bin and get busy making wishes.Irrelevant if you don't make the effort to obtain a bottle.
"Reason to believe" would be dependent upon the individual who either accepts what is said about Self-realization or denies it.If one hasn't, there is still no reason to believe.
Who told you to interpret the Bible literally?I believe Bible God exists. I believe so because this world exists as told in the Bible and also because I don't believe people could write Bible without God.
These aren't factual statements. So why are you basing your decision that a God exists on them?And Bible tells God is:
God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.
John 4:24
He who doesn't love doesn't know God, for God is love.
1 John 4:8
We know and have believed the love which God has for us. God is love, and he who remains in love remains in God, and God remains in him.
1 John 4:16
I would look at it as not being a slave to biological instinct. Have the unconscious or instinct etc flow through a concious filter of reason.
As long as you don't confuse your brain and my brain as the exact same nature, then okay. If you do, I will point it out.
Then anything goes. What any arbitrary person believes can be total fantasy or accidentally true. Without standards of reasoning a human (that is capable of disciplined thinking: reasoning) can't really know what is false and what is true, they are just like robots lost in a fantasy. How do such people make sound judgments in life? Do you think the 9-11 hijackers would have flown planes into buildings if they were skilled, rational thinkers who followed facts to sound conclusions?"Reason to believe" would be dependent upon the individual who either accepts what is said about Self-realization or denies it.
Have you ever had a lucid dream? A dream where your dream character knows he's dreaming...knows the real you is lying in bed asleep and dreaming? Why doesn't your dream character dismiss that person lying in bed as an illusion or the consider the knowledge that you are lying in bed asleep and dreaming as mistaken?Just last night I had a dream that I was traveling with my girlfriend and we met up with some other couple. We ended up backstage at a concert, and at some point there were the White Stripes warming up. They ended up not being the band that performed. Why were they in my dream and not even playing at the concert? I'm not really a fan of theirs. Weird. I can tell you I didn't interact with this other couple as we humans do with other actual people in every day life, nor with the White Stripes.
Illusions created in minds are not independent of the mind, so not an interaction in he context being discussed. What you are describing would b more of a reaction to illusions/dreams that could be mistaken as real experiences. I can remeber several occassions waking up from amazing dreams and actually believing they really happens for a number of seconds until I regained my conscious awareness. That really sucked. I mean I was really, super disappointed.
This illustrates that our minds can be lost in what seems real, but isn't. I suggest many more fervent theists can deliberately create illusions that they work to believe are true and real. I think they use debate as a way to defend their illusions to critics and this acts to strengthen their resolve within their own minds.
"Reason to believe" would be dependent upon the individual who either accepts what is said about Self-realization or denies it.
Do you accept @SalixIncendium answer?
If so, then the logic should be obvious.
I'm amused at how you are comparing enlightened sages with the 9/11 hijackers.Then anything goes. What any arbitrary person believes can be total fantasy or accidentally true. Without standards of reasoning a human (that is capable of disciplined thinking: reasoning) can't really know what is false and what is true, they are just like robots lost in a fantasy. How do such people make sound judgments in life? Do you think the 9-11 hijackers would have flown planes into buildings if they were skilled, rational thinkers who followed facts to sound conclusions?
They flew planes into buildings because they followed you "anything goes" approach, where truth is at the whim of any arbitrary person. Bad people believing this way will pose a bigger threat to society.
No, I am a polytheist and animist for whom there are many gods/spirits. I experience the world as composed of many different things with many different natures that interrelate and interconnect to one another; those are the gods/spirits. I do not envision them as much as experience them in my day-to-day existence. Sky is Sky, Sun is Sun, Tree is Tree, River is River, Wind is Wind...So that is the question. Do you think there is a God? Please describe how you envision this God. Thank you.
I can only describe the god I believe in with help of analogy. Any description I give of God, is not meant literally.So that is the question. Do you think there is a God? Please describe how you envision this God. Thank you.