No. He is correct. Utter nonsense.I don't think so.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No. He is correct. Utter nonsense.I don't think so.
That is you. No evidence for your objections to science. Most of the time your posts are so incoherent it is difficult to tell what you are talking about.Lol. No proof, all conjecture for your beliefs.
I see. And you know this how? because you believe in past evolution leading 'up' to humans and think it's an ongoing thing, humans or something else maybe leading into more advanced (perhaps?) organisms? Who knows? Maybe gorillas and ants, etc., will evolve to something different. Of course the excuse is that we either have not had the time to actually see this, or for a long enough time no big records were kept of gorillas, let's say, evolving into something other than gorillas.We have a prayer in Hinduism "Tamaso mam Jyotir-gamayah" (Lead me from darkness to light). You seem to believe in the opposite "Jyotirmam Tamaso gamayah" (Lead me from light to darkness). Well, your wish.Good that you realize that. Every thing (even two stones, in shape, composition, etc. - as Buddhists would say Nama-roopa), is unique. There will be Homo sapiens futurensis.
Yeah, that is true. Every being will evolve further to a new form, just like we went from carts to cars to EVs. The record of change is/will be available in fossils.Maybe gorillas and ants, etc., will evolve to something different. .. or for a long enough time no big records were kept of gorillas, let's say, evolving into something other than gorillas.
Did these organisms evolve different from one another? Do their brains think differently? Is one "smarter" than the other?
Not sure of that. When you say suited to their environment, could be there was a group of same type animals and an earthquake came along and destroyed that group. Or a meteor knocked them out. Does that mean in your opinion they weren't suited to their environment and so died out by "natural selection"? Men can travel in space with masks. Does that mean they are or not suited to that environment?Yeah, that is true. Every being will evolve further to a new form, just like we went for carts to cars to EVs. The record of change is/will be avaialbe in fossils.
Butterflies belong to class 'Insecta', birds belong to cAves' These are two different lineages. Check in Wikipedia.
There is no 'smarter' or 'duller' in evolution. If they are surviving, they are the all suited for their environment. Woolly mammoths were not.
Yet butterflies are essential to the environment. So are birds. Butterflies don't live that long, birds live a bit longer, have different qualities, different brain structures.Yeah, that is true. Every being will evolve further to a new form, just like we went from carts to cars to EVs. The record of change is/will be available in fossils.
Butterflies belong to class 'Insecta', birds belong to class "Aves'. These are two different lineages. Check in Wikipedia.
There is no 'smarter' or 'duller' in evolution. If they are surviving, they are the all suited for their environment. Woolly mammoths were not.
Whether it was a volcano eruption or a meteorite impact, or global cooling or warming, the fact is that some species can survive the change while others do not... could be there was a group of same type animals and an earthquake came along and destroyed that group. Or a meteor knocked them out. Does that mean in your opinion they weren't suited to their environment and so died out by "natural selection"? Men can travel in space with masks. Does that mean they are or not suited to that environment?
.. still no distinct observations of actual evolution. No distinct direct observation of fossils growing into the next stages.
At least, here you are correct.Yet butterflies are essential to the environment. So are birds. Butterflies don't live that long, birds live a bit longer, have different qualities, different brain structures.
You sure do meander around in your posts.I see. And you know this how? because you believe in past evolution leading 'up' to humans and think it's an ongoing thing, humans or something else maybe leading into more advanced (perhaps?) organisms? Who knows? Maybe gorillas and ants, etc., will evolve to something different. Of course the excuse is that we either have not had the time to actually see this, or for a long enough time no big records were kept of gorillas, let's say, evolving into something other than gorillas.
By the way, I was looking at a little video of butterflies getting friendly with a bird in the house. Butterflies have a small brain, wouldn't you say? Birds do, too, not as small as the butterflies. Butterflies do not do the same things as birds. So the question is, what do you think? Did these organisms evolve different from one another? Do their brains think differently? Is one "smarter" than the other?
Earthquakes and meteors are random events that can overcome selection and go straight to extinction. We do the same thing with bulldozers. It depends on how localized the event and the population is.Not sure of that. When you say suited to their environment, could be there was a group of same type animals and an earthquake came along and destroyed that group. Or a meteor knocked them out. Does that mean in your opinion they weren't suited to their environment and so died out by "natural selection"? Men can travel in space with masks. Does that mean they are or not suited to that environment?
So far as written records of humans (the only ones developing writing systems, insofar as I know to record their obserrvations and history), there were for millenia no record of observation of any species moving into another species. (evolving) And while conjectures abound about fossils and lookalikes, still no distinct observations of actual evolution. No distinct direct observation of fossils growing into the next stages. Now if only they had motion pictures during those times. Time video capsules. In progress. Of course there are excuses as to why that is. But anyway, humans are the ONLY ones that have the ability to write down their observations and history. Unlike butterflies and birds. A big -- giant -- leap (gap) from whatever evolutionists say are humans close relatives. A big leap. Big. Even if only a few percentage points.
Butterflies are invertebrates with brains that you would not even recognize as a brain. Birds are vertebrates and, though smaller, you would recognize it for what it is. Of course, it is much reduced in size and function, since birds need the light weight for flight.Yet butterflies are essential to the environment. So are birds. Butterflies don't live that long, birds live a bit longer, have different qualities, different brain structures.
Men can travel in space with masks.
Does that mean they are or not suited to that environment?
So far as written records of humans (the only ones developing writing systems, insofar as I know to record their obserrvations and history), there were for millenia no record of observation of any species moving into another species. (evolving) And while conjectures abound about fossils and lookalikes, still no distinct observations of actual evolution. No distinct direct observation of fossils growing into the next stages.
Whenever I am insulted as if others think they're so much "smarter" than I am, or better educated in the way of evolultion, I find it amusing. So -- have a good night as you move along.Whether it was a volcano eruption or a meteorite impact, or global cooling or warming, the fact is that some species can survive the change while others do not.
Yeah, humans are not suited to the environment of space or moon or Mars. That is why they need various contraptions to survive there. It is OK for a group of ten or twenty, but not for a multitude.
Fossils are a distinct, direct proof of evolution. You should not really talk about space or evolution, you are either too ill-informed or too biased about science. Keep to scriptures and to your prophets / sons / messengers / manifestation / mahdis.At least, here you are correct.
This does not mean that these different organisms came about by means of automatic (yes, automatic) evolution called "natural selection." It means that there are similar characteristics among these organisms. That's what it means.See the similarity between a bird embryo, a Human embryo and a dinosaur embryo; and stop arguing uselessly.
Bird embryo, Human embryo, dinosaur embryo
Biology does not prove that humans are here because of evolution. If you think so, that's what you think. I no longer go with that.
I see. And you know this how?
because you believe in past evolution leading 'up' to humans and think it's an ongoing thing
, humans or something else maybe leading into more advanced (perhaps?) organisms? Who knows?
Maybe gorillas and ants, etc., will evolve to something different.
Of course the excuse is that we either have not had the time to actually see this, or for a long enough time no big records were kept of gorillas, let's say, evolving into something other than gorillas.
By the way, I was looking at a little video of butterflies getting friendly with a bird in the house. Butterflies have a small brain, wouldn't you say? Birds do, too, not as small as the butterflies. Butterflies do not do the same things as birds. So the question is, what do you think? Did these organisms evolve different from one another? Do their brains think differently? Is one "smarter" than the other?
I find it sad that you recognize that there are those that are more knowledgeable and educated in science than you are, yet you continue to scoff at them, dismiss them and insult them while doing your best to make yourself seem the victim.Whenever I am insulted as if others think they're so much "smarter" than I am, or better educated in the way of evolultion, I find it amusing. So -- have a good night as you move along.
She doesn't trust "science" .. she'd rather stick with her beliefs as they are more dear to her than scientific theories.I find it sad that you recognize that there are those that are more knowledgeable and educated in science than you are, yet you continue to scoff at them, dismiss them and insult them while doing your best to make yourself seem the victim.
He is a she.He doesn't trust "science" .. he'd rather stick with his beliefs as they are more dear to him than scientific theories.