• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Does god make a good parent?

it's_sam

it's_sam

Freak of Nature
He expresses his opinions well as far as ive seen, and he is most deffinately not alone on the JW thing. Personaly i like birthday parties and so does my son, my whole family gets together and its fun. Why would I want to take that away from him?
 
MurphtheSurf

MurphtheSurf

Active Member
jonman122 said:
unless you answer the question, no, it just says how ignorant you are and how you assume something that you cant even voice with your opinion, rather you just make a comment that is abstract like "this speaks volumes"
Click to expand...

Now we've gotten into the name calling and labeling mode. Actually, I'm surprised it happen sooner.
Anna it seems has taken the wise course (maybe) and backed out, or maybe she is researching the 1975 story. (Another wise course)

Point is, if she were ever a JW, which I doubt, why can't she discern whether anyone else is or not?
 
Last edited:
jonman122

jonman122

Active Member
MurphtheSurf said:
Now we've gotten into the name calling and labeling mode. Actually, I'm surprised it happen sooner.
Anna it seems has taken the wise course (maybe) and backed out, or maybe she is researching the 1975 story. (Another wise course)
Click to expand...

she's actually getting the evidence to prove the 1975 "story" that pegg agreed with :) since she'd already shown it to peg.
 
waitasec

waitasec

Veteran Member
MurphtheSurf said:
Now we've gotten into the name calling and labeling mode. Actually, I'm surprised it happen sooner.
Anna it seems has taken the wise course (maybe) and backed out, or maybe she is researching the 1975 story. (Another wise course)
Click to expand...

hey!!!
does god make a good parent...:sad:
why all this unnecessary banter on both sides, huh? this doesn't need to get ugly, cause it will only make ya'll feel yucky...it takes 2 to tango
:rainbow1: peace out
 
MurphtheSurf

MurphtheSurf

Active Member
waitasec said:
hey!!!
does god make a good parent...:sad:
why all this unnecessary banter on both sides, huh? this doesn't need to get ugly, cause it will only make ya'll feel yucky...it takes 2 to tango
:rainbow1: peace out
Click to expand...

God makes the best parent, a model for all earthly fathers.
Good night.
 
AnnaTheBeast

AnnaTheBeast

Member
The August 15, 1968 Watchtower
Are we to assume from this study that the battle of Armageddon will be all over by the autumn of 1975, and the long-looked-for thousand-year reign of Christ will begin by then? Possibly, but we wait to see how closely the seventh thousand-year period of man's existence coincides with the sabbathlike thousand-year reign of Christ. If these two periods run parallel with each other as to the calendar year, it will not be by mere chance or accident but will be according to Jehovah's loving and timely purposes....It may involve only a difference of weeks or months, not years." -- page 499
 
MurphtheSurf

MurphtheSurf

Active Member
AnnaTheBeast said:
The August 15, 1968 Watchtower
Are we to assume from this study that the battle of Armageddon will be all over by the autumn of 1975, and the long-looked-for thousand-year reign of Christ will begin by then? Possibly, but we wait to see how closely the seventh thousand-year period of man's existence coincides with the sabbathlike thousand-year reign of Christ. If these two periods run parallel with each other as to the calendar year, it will not be by mere chance or accident but will be according to Jehovah's loving and timely purposes....It may involve only a difference of weeks or months, not years." -- page 499
Click to expand...

I see the words "possibly", "are we to assume" and "it may" but not the words "it will" or "for a certainty"
Do you have anything else?
You quoted the Watchtower, but did you get that from one of the aforementioned web sites of hate? I beg your pardon but the format looks like it. The web site you got this from is the source I was asking for.
 
Last edited:
MurphtheSurf

MurphtheSurf

Active Member
AnnaTheBeast said:
LOL the format looks like it?
Thats your watchtower. Derp.
Click to expand...

Is that all you got?
Derp?
It seems that I am correct that it came from the web sites of lies and hate. Otherwise why post the way you did?

I see the words "possibly", "are we to assume" and "it may" but not the words "it will" or "for a certainty"
Care to address this portion of my response?
 
AnnaTheBeast

AnnaTheBeast

Member
And no it wasnt an apostate site, it was a neutral that tells about the history, or specific times in history, that happened in religon. from theistic to non theistic religons.
I dont use apostate sites =/ or look at them for that matter. Both the Watchtower site and the apostate site are not valid uses. Watchtower says things to favor themselves, and apostates say things to make them look stupid. that is why i use neutral sites.
 
MurphtheSurf

MurphtheSurf

Active Member
AnnaTheBeast said:
Or you can stop editing and make new posts instead of trying to make me look stupid when in fact its all you >.>
Click to expand...

Didn't I warn you before you proceeded with this? Didn't I offer you a way out if you just dropped the whole thing?
Editing (adding to my posts) wouldn't matter if you were right, would it?
 
jonman122

jonman122

Active Member
p36.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top