Photonic
Ad astra!
Gitmo?
US Citizens?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Gitmo?
Not at all. For example, from a domestic view, you can't get anymore physicial than death. And many states, including my own, still allows for corpal punishment in schools and other government facilities.
When you move into the federal arena, there are all types of "interrogation" techniques at play, and the military isn't know for its soft touch. To date there is only one form of execution that has been ruled unconstitutional by the USSC: drawing and quartering.
Honestly, why any politician would think that a force trained to defeat and kill an enemy would make a good police force is beyond me. The military should fight wars, and the police should worry about civilians. But I guess that's a bit off topic for this one.
There are U.S citizens in GitmoUS Citizens?
Considering Padilla was held for years in military custody with no formal charges brought, many were shocked by this move by the George W. Bush presidential administration,[25] and some[who?] reasoned that a repeat of such a process would allow the U.S. government to detain citizens indefinitely without presenting the cause that would eventually be tried.
The military is not brought in to deal with civilian matters ever. That's what the police are for.
So you DO concede the point!God damnit George Bush, still screwing me even after he gets out of office.
So you DO concede the point!
But it happens in Western correctional facilities as well. And the traditional system does not work. So like I said earlierYes. I will not concede on corporal punishment though.
Actually it does, one could easily argue that if a greater deterrent prevents crimes it is humane and just in that it both protects society and would be criminals.
Actually it does, one could easily argue that if a greater deterrent prevents crimes it is humane and just in that it both protects society and would be criminals. I have some statistics in a book back home that I'll dig out for you that should illustrate the point.
Saudi Arabia is cruel on other Muslims as well for the crime of not being Arab. Most Muslims look at their leaders with disgust because they are imposed on them.I know that not all Muslims are cruel but countries like Saudi Arabia are very cruel. People learn their stereotypes from such countries.
Saudi Arabia is cruel on other Muslims as well for the crime of not being Arab. Most Muslims look at their leaders with disgust because they are imposed on them.
True it is a common sentiment thought I'd expect there would be some variables. For example, many American-Iranians are expats from the old revolution and hate the Ayatollahs that seized power from what was a revolution supported from all walks of lief (Muslim leaders, academics, secular communists etc. etc.)I took a few classes in Farsi. The teacher and most of the students were from Iran. They HATE their leader. I mean really hate him, you think Obama is hated he's got nothing on the level of hate that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has managed to garner.
I don't think Islam could possibly exist, if they didn't have enemies to fight with, to conquer and to subjugate.