• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Does it really matter if we believe in God?

That is what the Writings of Baha'u'llah seem to indicate...

“It is clear and evident that all men shall, after their physical death, estimate the worth of their deeds, and realize all that their hands have wrought. I swear by the Day Star that shineth above the horizon of Divine power! They that are the followers of the one true God shall, the moment they depart out of this life, experience such joy and gladness as would be impossible to describe, while they that live in error shall be seized with such fear and trembling, and shall be filled with such consternation, as nothing can exceed. Well is it with him that hath quaffed the choice and incorruptible wine of faith through the gracious favor and the manifold bounties of Him Who is the Lord of all Faiths…” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 171

I think "they that live in error" are evil people, like murderers and rapists, and murder is the worst. I do not think that He was referring to nonbelievers, unless they lived in error, but that could also apply to a believer.
The only clear message I seem to be getting from that and other scriptures Baha'u'llah wrote is that there is joy and gladness for believers , IF they followed the one true God. The same idea comes across in the following quote...

“Death proffereth unto every confident believer the cup that is life indeed. It bestoweth joy, and is the bearer of gladness. It conferreth the gift of everlasting life.” Gleanings, p. 345

That would seem like a win-win situation although I wonder if some people deserve a second chance... I can be rather harsh, but on really evil people, not on non-believers. ;) I do watch a lot of true crime programs and it is UN-believable how selfish and evil people can be. I guess we have to leave it up to God to decide whether He will forgive them or not. :(

My view is that real evil, selfish peoplr God will place in hell. If they change, God forgives. If they dont, then they remain.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
So your telling me that you assume to know there intentions?

I dont doubt there are some insincere confessions, where they do it by ritual and then just keep comitting the same sin.

But, not everyone has that intention.
No argument there. I was talking about the general trends as I perceive them on the actual people.

I have interacted with many a Christian.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
That is part a problem of theology for those religions which place a heavy emphasis on belief. Although I do agree that it can be a social and cultural factor such as in the nation-state.
One has to first believe, but that is not what religion should be all about; it should be a way of life. What we believe should be put into practice in our daily lives. Baha’u’llah said to let deeds, not words, be our adorning.
Did your isolation include that from a religious community. I do not mean to pry but I was talking about the echo chamber of religious communities which reinforce a view point. If you were not part of such a community you were not exposed to the same type of conduct I am talking about. Although I would add I do not think Baha'i is the type of religion which has created communities on the scale of Christianity or Islam.
I have not participated in the Baha’i community for most of my 48 years as a Baha’i. I have had personal reasons for that and those have changed over the years. But it is not only Baha’is I am isolated from, I generally do not like socializing in person, only online. I am an introvert so I prefer being alone. Seeing people all day at work is all that I can handle. People chatting about what I consider petty things tends to annoy me. I know that is what most people like to do so I try to keep to myself.
“I appreciate your pointing that out. I had never really thought of it that way.”
Yah it was a common point when I was religious.
You were religious? I would never classify myself as religious, I just happen to believe in God and Baha’u’llah.
A problem is a lot of our society has changed to revolve around those things as a necessity of life. Many of us no longer create our own products nor food. This changes the wealth dynamic into one of wealth displays rather than production. Wealth displays became a selling point even if the choice of a purchase was due to practical purposes. For example a family have a large vehicle due to a large family. Often those vehicles being larger than a standard model include frills anyways. So it become easily to mistake a piece of property as a simple material possession instead of having to life in the world as it is.

I would call people that buy items for the sake of having it are frivolous. For example people that buy the new version of phone X every new model.
Our society has changes and every year it seems to get more materialistic. New technology has only made this worse. Sure, it can make life easier, but it also makes it more complicated and it also makes more “things” available for people to get attached to. The question is, do people really need all these things?

Admittedly, I get a lot of flak from people who know that I have three houses, but were I to do it over again I would not even have one house. I don’t know where I would live, maybe a cabin in the woods. The problem is we have 10 cats. Were it not for that wecould live in a small apartment or an old cabin, I don’t really care that much. Three houses, two with tenants, and 10 cats is a huge stress and precludes many activities which is one reason I am on forums so much.I have reasons to keep the houses and I love the cats more than anything in this life, so I just work around it. This too shall pass. I just live one day at a time.This life is not forever.
Do not confuse profit for greed.
So, are you saying you think it is okay that I profit from my rental houses and that does not necessarily make me greedy?
Depends on who you are talking about. Some people claim to be religious but are not. Politicians for example.
That is an astute observation.
Depends on what the enjoyment is and what their theology teaches. For example there is a Christian group that believes in the Prosperity Gospel. To keep it simple one's success or failure is a sign of God's Will and blessing, or lack of. So if one believes their success is God's Will they are not going to shun what they see as blessing.
That is kind of like the Protestant work ethic and the idea that a person's duty is to achieve success through hard work and thrift, such success being a sign that one is saved, which implies that poor people are not saved. I find that rather offensive.
I can understand that. I do hold similar views myself regarding spending habits of many people and governments. Although that is more about being raised by an accountant than a religion.
Lol, every year at tax time my accountant tells me I should be spending more of my money and he does not understand why I am even still working, when I could be retired and “enjoying life.” He does not understand just how complicated my life is. So much for free will, I do not think things can be changed as easily as some people think.
Better is one of those values that is hard to judge with data let alone without any. Also consider some people may only be seen as better due to circumstances out of their control, conditioning and life experiences. For example it is far easier for one to be generous when they are rich then when one is poor. They may not be as generous as it appears when money is worth far less due to a high net worth. 10k USD to one is like 5 dollars to another.
That is true, life circumstances do vary and many of these are outside of our control. We cannot help the parents we had, where we grew up, and what our genetics are. I think those set the stage for what will happen later, but also there are accidents and diseases one might get that can change a life overnight. In many ways, I have been very fortunate, in other ways not. I try to appreciate what I have, but mostly it is all the stress from the material world that makes my life so difficult.
Honestly this seems more like a social problem. Often people find a lot of joy in family and friends regardless of religious belief. In a way I can understand. When I stopped drinking a lot of activities I found enjoyable were no longer so. It changes my own social dynamic especially for friends that were alcoholics. I had to look for new hobbies and activities as those were not flying at me as it did during my education years.
I never had a drinking problem because both my parents were alcoholics, and I stayed away from alcohol. But I did have addictions in my earlier life, even while I was a Baha’i. It took a long time to break free of all that. I was a changed person after that, but then I also had to deal with the reason I had the addictions and that took total dedication for about 15 years of my life. Then I had to deal with my hateful feelings towards God which took another 10 years. Now I am trying to be a Baha’i... It is a miracle I got as far as I did in life, with my education and career. I write that off to sheer stubbornness and an unwillingness to ever give up.

I do not have to look for hobbies, the cats and other animals and people on forums and houses and tenants take all my time. I rarely even have time to go out to lunch or dinner, let alone ever going on a vacation anymore.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
One reason, dear Trailblazer, is because we know how sacred everything else can be. :)
Why does it have to be an either/or? Why can’t more than one thing be sacred?

I am still struggling with what you mean by sacred. Can you give me some examples of everyday life things that you consider sacred?
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Few choices, that anyone experiences, are between any clear cut sense of good versus evil. That sort of thinking is probably part of what makes Christian morality seem childish.

Rather what people experience is conflicting needs and influences and the profound inadequacy of a lot of trite answers to much more complex issues.

What is needed are answers which come from experience, from an experience of vulnerability and not being perfect or all-powerful or all-knowing, not a book written 2000 years ago supposedly by someone who cant be judged or argued with but can judge and punish all they want.
I was oversimplifying to make my point about free will. Obviously it is not that cut and dry, with only two choices of good or evil and nothing in between. Yes, we learn from experience, from making mistakes, but we can avoid a lot of the pitfalls by following the Guidance given us in the Bible and other scriptures.

Life is complicated. We cannot always know what the “right thing” is to do. All we can do is our best to follow what the Guidance given us. We will stumble and fall because we are all fallible human beings but we will learn and grow every time we fall.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Definition of live for: Regard as the purpose or most important aspect of one's life.

Yes, the material world offer food, water, book, movie, hobby, family, friendship, love...etc. They live for those things might because it makes them happy, it gives meanings/purpose to their life.
Yes, that is probably why most people live for the material world, it makes them happy. That is what most people care about, being happy. I question whether personal happiness is what we should be living for. Since I believe in God I think there is a higher purpose for our existence than just to eat, drink and be merry and enjoy the physical pleasures.
Why don't they only live for God?
How dare they live for the world?

It reminds me of those oppressive and abusive husbands who demand their wives to only live for them. Is God such a petty, jealous, egocentric and egotistical being who demand everyone to live only for God?
When I say “live for God” I do not mean that the way you apparently think. I mean live according to what God says is our purpose. God does not need anything from humans, He just wants what is best for them. What is best for us is to sacrifice our selfish desires for the good of other people.
“Why don’t they follow the teachings of their religion regarding detachment and sacrifice?”

It can be because:
(1) They're imperfect humans, so they make mistakes too.
(2) They have follow the teachings of their religion according to their interpretation about those teachings. You, as an outsider, have a different interpretation about their religion's teachings. You think they're wrong, they think you're wrong, the end.
(3) Other reasons.
Thanks. Those are good answers.
“Our purpose in revealing these convincing and weighty utterances is to impress upon the seeker that he should regard all else beside God as transient, and count all things save Him, Who is the Object of all adoration, as utter nothingness.” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 266

(A) Please explain precisely what do you mean by "utter nothingness".
Essentially it means that they are not worth bothering with, not worthy of our attention, like a mirage in the desert we think is really great, but later come to discover it was nothing at all. I can further elucidate on that if you are interested. It is a big subject.
(B) Please sharing here the complete lists of behaviours a person have to follow to qualify that they have regard the world as utter nothingness.
Really it is an attitude that God (or should I say God’s work) is more important than self (what we want), and from that attitude selfless behaviors would follow. There is no actual list of behaviors, they would be different for different people. This is the ideal, but obviously it is not easy to attain for most people because most people find enjoyment in the material world and they are not going to sacrifice that unless they realize there is something more fulfilling.
“Finally, if it does not matter if we believe in God before we die, and we will all find out that God exists after we die, why even bother to believe in God? I mean most atheists I know live very moral lives, so they do not really need the teachings and laws of religions, so why does it matter if they believe in God before they die?”

Is the questions also intended for believers only?
No, you can answer it if you have an answer.
“I have some personal reasons for asking these questions that might come out later.”
Okay. Has it come out already?
No, I have not come out with the reasons yet. Do you want to know what they are?
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
My view is that real evil, selfish peoplr God will place in hell. If they change, God forgives. If they dont, then they remain.
I can go along with that, only I do not think that there is a very good chance they will ever change, since there is no free will in the afterlife. Thus they will have to rely upon the prayers of others and the mercy of God.
 
I can go along with that, only I do not think that there is a very good chance they will ever change, since there is no free will in the afterlife. Thus they will have to rely upon the prayers of others and the mercy of God.

Why is there no free will in hell?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Why does it have to be an either/or?

It doesn't. I just find the focus on specific people as presumed Messengers of God to be a subpar approach towards religiosity. It brings considerable dangers that are only rarely properly addressed. Even at its best, it is still inefficient IMO.

Why can’t more than one thing be sacred?

Nearly everything is sacred, at least for some people.

I am still struggling with what you mean by sacred. Can you give me some examples of everyday life things that you consider sacred?

The joy of learning better when such a lesson is necessary to avoid grief and sorrow.

The realization that I love someone and that such love gives me unabiguous direction and purpose.

The attaining of sincere gratitude for the good will of people who could have denied us that.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
A third part of this question is for believers. What do you think will be the repercussions of non-belief? By repercussions I mean what do you think will happen to nonbelievers after they die? Do you have a set belief about that? I sure don’t, but it is a big concern of mine and I have no real answers
My Master makes it clear there are no repercussions of "non-belief" ... I like this view better than the Christian view

Finally, if it does not matter if we believe in God before we die, and we will all find out that God exists after we die, why even bother to believe in God? I mean most atheists I know live very moral lives, so they do not really need the teachings and laws of religions, so why does it matter if they believe in God before they die?
That one is simple to me. To realize God means you realize Love (different from sex etc), so you will be happy. It is not needed to "believe in God" before you die, but for me the goal is to "realize God" before I die. Reason is simple ... "realize God" means "realize Love" means "HAPPY" (not in worldly sense of course).
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
You have the nerve to say im misrepresenting your position when in reality thats what your doing to mine.
I've done no such thing.

Then you wanna get me in trouble with the moderators for something you deserve to have done to you. Stop misrepresenting my views or ill get trigger happy and pull that report trigger on you next time.
I'm not going to discuss moderation with you.

I haven't even referred to your views specifically. I've only ever talked about god belief in general.

I recognize full well that there are theists who believe in an afterlife in Heaven and God's divine plan. If this doesn't describe your beliefs, fine; just recognize that it does describe the beliefs of most theists.

Now, if im misrepresenting you thinking theists believe there absolved of responsibility, then what about this you said >

"Someone who believes in a God that can swoop and fix everything whenever he chooses has less motivation to do good in the world than someone who thinks it's all up to us.

Someone who thinks that God is in charge and will make sure that things won't get too bad has no reason to do the things necessary to guard against catastrophe.

Someone who sees this life as just a prelude for an unending afterlife has less reason to see this life - and the lives of others - as precious than someone who thinks that this short life is the only one we'll ever get."

In otherwords, God absolves us of responsibility.
Well, no. I talked about motivation, not responsibility. Do you need me to explain the difference to you?

If you want to talk about responsibility, though... if you're responsible for the well-being of someone else, for instance, which would be a better way of honouring that responsibility?

- doing an imperfect job yourself
- asking for help from the much more competent person standing right there and ready to help

BTW: have you heard the phrase "let go and let God?" I would be surprised if you haven't, since it's plastered all over wall art, T-shirts, bumper stickers, social media, etc. It encapsulates the mindset I'm talking about. If we can't rely on God, then "let go and let God" becomes "let go and screw 'em."

No, theists are NOT acting like there God does not exist. There acting like this God gave them responsibilities.

Yes, God can save everyone from harm, but if he did that, free will would be gone, plus responsibility gone too.
Nonsense, but regardless, an example:

When an atheist doctor goes to extraordinary lengths to save their patient, they're trying to save the only life the person has.

When a Christian doctor goes to the same lengths to save a patient, we can conclude one of two things. Either:

- they don't actually believe that the patient is destined for an afterlife that's better than life on Earth, or
- they believe it, but they're behaving irrationally.

By your logic if a child is goven responsibility from its parrent, this must mean the parrent does not exist.

Thats....nonsense.
Sounds like you don't have the first clue of what "my logic" is.
 
I've done no such thing.

Yes you are misrepresenting my beliefs. I already told you i believed in Gods divine plan and a afterlife and below in this post you still are saying i dont believe this.

>"I recognize full well that there are theists who believe in an afterlife in Heaven and God's divine plan. If this doesn't describe your beliefs, fine; just recognize that it does describe the beliefs of most theists."

So, this is the second time i am telling you what i believe and your saying no its not again.

I'm not going to discuss moderation with you.

do whatever you want.

I haven't even referred to your views specifically. I've only ever talked about god belief in general.

Yes you are, we are talking about my beliefs here. And if your not, then why bother talking to me then?

I recognize full well that there are theists who believe in an afterlife in Heaven and God's divine plan. If this doesn't describe your beliefs, fine; just recognize that it does describe the beliefs of most theists.

You see? Your not listening. I DO BELIEVE in Gods divine plan and a afterlife. How much more clear do i need to spell it out to you?

Well, no. I talked about motivation, not responsibility. Do you need me to explain the difference to you?

First of all, assuming to know and then attacking motivation is an ad hominum falicious argument. Second of all, motives will indeed dictate peoples actions (aka responsibility).

If you want to talk about responsibility, though... if you're responsible for the well-being of someone else, for instance, which would be a better way of honouring that responsibility?

- doing an imperfect job yourself
- asking for help from the much more competent person standing right there and ready to help

God wants us to LEARN knowledge and skills (aka "competent") and have RESPONSIBILITY.

BTW: have you heard the phrase "let go and let God?" I would be surprised if you haven't, since it's plastered all over wall art, T-shirts, bumper stickers, social media, etc. It encapsulates the mindset I'm talking about. If we can't rely on God, then "let go and let God" becomes "let go and screw 'em."

Yes, ive heard the saying. Ive never interpreted it that way, for me it was all about letting go of what i cannot control or change. Perhaps i need to eat those words in regards to you misrepresenting my views by realizing you will not change. But, mayby im wrong, mayby you will learn to deal with the correct representation of my views. I doubt it though. If you havent by now, you wont ever.

Nonsense, but regardless, an example:

When an atheist doctor goes to extraordinary lengths to save their patient, they're trying to save the only life the person has.

When a Christian doctor goes to the same lengths to save a patient, we can conclude one of two things. Either:

- they don't actually believe that the patient is destined for an afterlife that's better than life on Earth, or
- they believe it, but they're behaving irrationally.

I keep correcting you on this but you refuse to accept it.

The christian doctor does believe in a afterlife, not just one thats better either, but one of a heaven and a hell. So, if that doc saves a life, he wants to do two things, make sure that person dont potentially go to hell and two, enact the knowledge he learned from Gods world and keep that person alive for his full years. Just because theres an afterlife dont mean this life is worthless, because God gave us this life too and it serves its purpose as a spiritual training ground BEFORE the afterlife.

Sounds like you don't have the first clue of what "my logic" is.

Oh really, well why dont you clarify it a bit more then!
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Thats true. However, whats your reasons you reject the view of God and a afterlife?
Why would I need any reason?

As a matter of fact, why do you think I am rejecting those at all?

They are just not a good fit to me. Far as I remember, they never were.
 
Top