Why do you ignore gravity?
But I never did ignore gravity, I need to know why you are highly over estimating Gravity, when during the first 10 million, or even the first 300 million years there was a very low gravitational force.
Think about this.
If matter is strewen out over the entire space of the Solar System,
and it only starts off to move towards the centres of these billions of eddies in this cloud of spacedust, how strong will the gravitational force be within this eddies?
It will be very, very small compared to say the current size of Jupitor.
If these space dust was a collection of ICY particles, near to absolute zero, the cores of these gravitational points will be just as cold.
If these billions of gravitational points are close to each other, travelling at roughly the same speed around the centre of the Nebular cloud, (lets for argument say they weigh rougly a kilo each,)...
They will not smash into each other with great force due to some immence gravitational force.
for one simple reason, the combined gravitational force was spread out in the orbit of the future planet.
Let me explain.
If we have these billions of small icy thistleballs strewen out in between the orbit of Venus and Mars' future orbits, it will look like an oval water channel covered with billions of polystyrene balls, with the polystirene representing the thistleballs.
Now, imagine the water moving in this chanel at a constant speed, and the polystirene balls on top of it.
The polystirene balls will not have huge crashes punching into each other, but as they travel, will attract each other very gently, untill initially a few hundred colections of these polystirene heaps is seen.
Lateron these heaps of polistyrine will either slow down or maintain their velocity, depending on how it rubs against the walls of this chanel (the walls will represent attraction deviations from orther such collections that might be just out of the range of the 2 orbits we spoke about, but might have some gravitational effect on the heaps in our chanel)
Eventually we will endup with only a few big heaps of Polystirene, and as the flow of the chanel continues, it will clump together into one huge clooection.
Now, lets think about the gravitational force of the various stages of this collection of thistleballs.
When it was still just dust, the gravitational forces were scattered over the full distance between the orbits of the future neighbouring planets of the Earth, and the same with the other planets.
When, in this pathwat around the sun, where the future Earth would shape, only two particles passed each other closeby, and their gravitational fields attracted each other. This happened throughout the whole "Pathway", and this was whgere the original gravitational fields came into being. Well, 2 particles had enough attraction to pull in one more, and so it continued, untill we have 1Kg balls. Their gravitational force was so poor, it did not seem to have the ennergy to pull any matter into itself with a force to heat anything up to a measurable energy level. Considering that these thistleballs were anyhow almost at absolute zero, they would continue to collect other balls and they will become 2Kg.
Still these balls were traveling at relative speeds to each other, and did not bash into each other, but integrated as they continued on this one way path.
Well, when these balls became planetessimals, and proto planets, they still did not heat up, but would travel this "Pathway" and some might gain just a few Km per hour on its forerunner, and they will join.
Agreed, only when these protp planets became say 5000 Km wide, did they have gravitational forces that would pull the smaller to itself.
Even in this scenario, we will still not see this huge crash because the smaller ball will swing around the larger, and will lose its own momentum against the attraction forces.
Only now will the biggest frozen ball, right in the centre have enough matter to create nuclear fusion, and it will ignite.
As for the planetary sized balls in the rest of this space, they already develloped into huge spheres turning on their axis' and orbits.
I still have to understand where this Hadean eon derived from.
The only model I know of suggesting this is the one from La Place, who was totally incorrect in claiming the Planets popped out of this residuce matter of the Sun.
This is the only way the Earth could have been a red hot glowing planet in space.
Problem is, La Place did not know that the Sun is turning too slow, and the law of conservation of ennergy will not explain the speed of the planets.
