YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
I first heard about it from Maharishi Mahesh Yogi when I got into Transcendental Marination.This is just plain wrong. Cosmic consciousness is a new-age idea, not a Buddhist one.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I first heard about it from Maharishi Mahesh Yogi when I got into Transcendental Marination.This is just plain wrong. Cosmic consciousness is a new-age idea, not a Buddhist one.
Nope. You don't understand me at all, really.I hear you say you have seen it but you don 't believe it. Is this correct?
You and me both, babe. Very well said. And... if you do not agree with them, you're just not looking at thing the right way (ie. their way). It does promote gales of laughter though... I will admit.I've had experiences of expanded awareness and feelings of cosmic connectedness. It just seems to be a jump to claim consciousness is absolute or universal based on subjective experiences alone. Plus, there's all these issues with semantics, etc. What exactly is consciousness? What are we talking about? I don't know that and I don't pretend to know. I'm suspicious of those who claim to know without a shadow of a doubt. I don't believe there is an antidote for uncertainty. It's like zen masters arguing over who is more humble and more enlightened.
So how would this supposedly differ from one who uses meditation but feels that there is no indication that such a "cosmic consciousness" actually exists?
You and me both, babe. Very well said.
I've had experiences of expanded awareness and feelings of cosmic connectedness. It just seems to be a jump to claim consciousness is absolute or universal based on subjective experiences alone.
I have never met anyone outside of the Jehovah's Wintesses who claim to know "without a shadow of doubt". The words "I think, so it's true " and "I believe with no doubt" are words that people who even believe like that (the JWs) don't say. So then it is in your imagination that people "claim to know without a shadow of a doubt". Why not start a thread with a poll and see if anyone here believes everything they think is true is true with no shadow of a doubt. I doubt myself all the time.I've had experiences of expanded awareness and feelings of cosmic connectedness. It just seems to be a jump to claim consciousness is absolute or universal based on subjective experiences alone. Plus, there's all these issues with semantics, etc. What exactly is consciousness? What are we talking about? I don't know that and I don't pretend to know. I'm suspicious of those who claim to know without a shadow of a doubt. I don't believe there is an antidote for uncertainty. It's like zen masters arguing over who is more humble and more enlightened.
I wasn't familiar with the term "jhana". but I'm familiar with the concept. My approach to and use of dharma is mainly philosophical/psychological, so I don't feel any need to buy the entire package. But then dharma itself says it's unnecessary to do so anyway.There are advanced Buddhist meditative states called jhana, which describe increasingly refined states of consciousness - these include infinite space and consciousness. It's possible to interpret these as accessing a transcendent level of reality, but it's a tricky and technical question and there is no consensus on it. Having had some experience of these states what I can say is that it would be easy to make assumptions about them. I think that sometimes people have such experiences and then want them to read all sorts of things into them - but wishful thinking is itself not conclusive.
I've tried pointing out the assumptive thingy to godnotgod before, but he seems impervious to the argument.There are advanced Buddhist meditative states called jhana, which describe increasingly refined states of consciousness - these include infinite space and consciousness. It's possible to interpret these as accessing a transcendent level of reality, but it's a tricky and technical question and there is no consensus on it. Having had some experience of these states what I can say is that it would be easy to make assumptions about them. I think that sometimes people have such experiences and then want them to read all sorts of things into them - but wishful thinking is itself not conclusive.
You are disagreeing with your opinion of us. That is funny!Nope. You don't understand me at all, really.
It's a part of my everyday existence. There is no need to humble myself to being. I am.
What I am lobbing grenades at is the inaccurate portrayal by yourself, godnotgod and others in this thread. A small, but important, difference.
Tell yourself whatever you have to.You are disagreeing with your opinion of us. That is funny!
That is what we all do. You too! Thank you for your permission. So kind!Tell yourself whatever you have to.
..sure things.
I've had experiences of expanded awareness and feelings of cosmic connectedness. It just seems to be a jump to claim consciousness is absolute or universal based on subjective experiences alone. Plus, there's all these issues with semantics, etc. What exactly is consciousness? What are we talking about? I don't know that and I don't pretend to know. I'm suspicious of those who claim to know without a shadow of a doubt. I don't believe there is an antidote for uncertainty. It's like zen masters arguing over who is more humble and more enlightened.
No one can, including those that have experienced it, provide evidence that it was not all in their head. As a subjective case it can't be supported by evidence which makes it tricky to argue for without sounding like a bag full of hot air.
Unbounded stupidity masking itself as deep thought?Death and taxes?
There are some things you don't need to tell us, godnotgod. Thanks for confirming the emptiness of your endless rhetoric though.Except that the experience has nothing to do with what is in the head. The head is empty.
So, what you are in essence saying is that a belief in "cosmic consciousness" and $5 can get one a small coffee at Starbucks.
BTW, how exactly can one actually experience "cosmic consciousness" unless they've actually traveled everywhere throughout the entire cosmos?
There are some things you don't need to tell us, godnotgod. Thanks for confirming the emptiness of your endless rhetoric though.
Oddly, I sense quite a healthy ego in your posts. Obviously, I'm wrong on that, as you are the Perfect Master playing the Master Game.Rhetoric to your mind, but empty through and through. But its a good empty, even empty of itself. As I said, the head is empty, but that may be over your head.