Secret Chief
Very strong language
It just followed on from another thread. Start a thread on Britain and fox hunting and see what I think.Cool.
You seemed to single out dog eating though.
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It just followed on from another thread. Start a thread on Britain and fox hunting and see what I think.Cool.
You seemed to single out dog eating though.
I do. And an extra level of condemnation for cruel practices and poor conditions.
It can be very difficult for a restaurant to offer both vegan and regular food. And for the same reasons that you rarely see kosher and nonkosher meals from the same restaurant. Vegans tend to be purists.. A vegan meal cooked on the same grill as a hamburger is going to pick up traces of animal products. Even using the same spatulas may be too much for them.For the record, I love meat. I have no moral issues with eating meat.
But that doesn't mean I have no moral issues with bad conditions and cruel practices.
My post concerned only the practice of eating meat.
For me, it's kind of a given that animals, while alive, should be treated well and living conditions should be up to standards. Regardless of what the purposed fate of the animals may be.
A cow meant for meat consumption shouldn't be treated differently then a cow meant for milk production or meant to be held as a pet imo.
I'm big on animal rights and consider it very important.
The slaughtering of an animal should also follow strict procedures imo to avoid any unnecessary suffering. Preferably no suffering at all.
And if for example, with all the climate change and all, cattle population should be heavily reduced leading to beef price going through the roof or even disappearing from the menu, then so be it.
Those are all sensible rational reasons.
I just will not put aside my meat dish just to accommodate for other people's emotional sensitivies.
I will respect their emotional sensitivities and / or their right to their opinions. As such, if I would own a standard restaurant for example, I would absolutely make sure to also offer vegetarian/vegan dishes. ("standard" as in if the concept of the place isn't like "bbq meat fiesta" or "vegan only" - but then you know that coming in).
But I expect the same from them.
I get to disagree with their opinions and have my own opinion also.
The bride's DNA is totally different from that of her people. But that is OK, it happens.
It can be very difficult for a restaurant to offer both vegan and regular food. And for the same reasons that you rarely see kosher and nonkosher meals from the same restaurant. Vegans tend to be purists.. A vegan meal cooked on the same grill as a hamburger is going to pick up traces of animal products. Even using the same spatulas may be too much for them.
It's an emotional statement. And it's perfectly fine off course to be off that opinion.
But I don't think it's fair to condemn other cultures for not complying to your emotional standards.
Note, though, that I'm talking specifically about culturally inspired / emotional standards.
I feel like it would be an entirely different thing if the objection would be more objective, like for example if people were happily eating endangered species. That would be an argument where you can make an objective rational case as opposed to a mere emotional or cultural one.
It can be very difficult for a restaurant to offer both vegan and regular food. And for the same reasons that you rarely see kosher and nonkosher meals from the same restaurant. Vegans tend to be purists.. A vegan meal cooked on the same grill as a hamburger is going to pick up traces of animal products. Even using the same spatulas may be too much for them.