Don't the Hinduism (Dharmic) people need a concise Scripture?

[Aupmanyav]

Those who don't belong to any revealed religion, they are also never 100% correct. Are they?

I think they are in a better position to understand things rather than the people who do not use their mind.

 

[Aupmanyav]

Isn't VaishnavaView attachment 13534 a Hinduism denomination and MahayanaView attachment 13533 a Buddhism denomination?
Why have both together?

Paarsurrey, friend, do not make people laugh at the extent of your knowledge. The sadhu in the first image is not a Vaishnava, he is a Shaiva Hindu. And Mahayana is a part of Buddhism. You have yourself put the two images together. What exactly are you asking?

 

[paarsurrey]

I think they are in a better position to understand things rather than the people who do not use their mind.

I don't agree with you, but respect you. We have to co-exist in this world even with our different standpoints.
Haven't one described one's religion "I am an advaitist Hindu and a strong atheist" putting one in two boats simultaneously?
Well, I don't mind really if one likes it, though. Please
Regards

 

[Aupmanyav]

Yeah, that is why I said I would not insist on the subject any further. As for what I am 'an advaitist Hindu and a strong atheist', I am very clear about my views. This requires no change. I don't think you will be able to understand the intricacies.

 

[paarsurrey]

Paarsurrey, friend, do not make people laugh at the extent of your knowledge. The sadhu in the first image is not a Vaishnava, he is a Shaiva. And Mahayana is a part of Buddhism. You have yourself put the two images together. What exactly are you asking?

I value your friendship.
I checked Vaishnava ,before posting, with the Wikipedia:
Vaishnavism (Vaishnava dharma) is one of the major traditions within Hinduism along with Shaivism, Shaktism, and Smartism. It is also called Vishnuism, its followers are called Vaishnavas, and it considers Vishnu as the Supreme Lord.

Please Google the world "Vaishnava" and one gets the image and the information both together.
I never claimed any scholarship or piety, I am an ordinary man on the street walking on the Truthful path, still heading towards more Truth or the Absolute Truth.
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

I don't think you will be able to understand the intricacies

You never explained to me the intricacies. Did you? Please
May be I could understand. And you are good and eloquent, I know.
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

That plethora is perhaps Hinduism's greatest strength. You have a multitude of very high quality texts to draw on. How is this a disadvantage?

And you have never told us about the "plethora" that you have "Beyond the Light" in store for you. Tell us something about that if it is a plus (+) point.
Hope you don't mind. Now don't be angry with me. Please
Regards

 

[Subhankar Zac]

"Islam is the only true religion in the world while others"
Islam is for everybody not just of me.I did not bring it from G-d. Please
The later part of the sentence that I did not do in magenta, I never said. Did I ever say such words? If yes, Kindly quote from me. Please
I love the founders of all the revealed and all their scriptures in the world,my pleasure to read them.
Is your religion a revealed one? Please name it, your denomination, its founder and his scripture that he received from G-d. Please
Regards

Exhibit A.
Of everything I just said.

 

[Subhankar Zac]

Sorry for the diversion.
Isn't VaishnavaView attachment 13534 a Hinduism denomination and MahayanaView attachment 13533 a Buddhism denomination?
Why have both together? Please
Please
Regards

Exhibit B.
Of everything I just said.

 

[Subhankar Zac]

paarsurrey said: ↑
I love the founders of all the revealed and all their scriptures in the world,my pleasure to read them. Is your religion a revealed one?

Those who don't belong to any revealed religion, they are also never 100% correct. Are they? Please
Regards

Exhibit C
Of everything I just said.

 

[Subhankar Zac]

@Subhankar Zac
Please don't be angry with me, we all here on RF are a community in itself. If we don't have different viewpoints, we would be machine-made. And we are not that.
Please help me trace out who translated the following passage :
“That which cannot be seen by the eye but through which the eye itself sees, know That to be Brahman (God) and not what people worship here (in the manifested world).”
Kena Upanishad (1.7) Yajurveda

Regards

What else m I supposed to do at such stupidity?

 

[Nyingjé Tso]

Vanakkam,

Please see below a picture of a Vaishnav sadhu

And below à picture of a Shaiva sadhu

The différence is the tilak (the mark on the forehead) that you Will see in a great majority of Hindus. The tilak is an indication of the wearer's Ishta dev or sect, there are also a pletora of variations within the same shapes for different sampraday, lineages, or even just personal préférences of each devotee

Aum Namah Shivaya

 

[paarsurrey]

LuisDantas said: ↑
@paarsurrey is not a robot. He may be difficult to deal with at times, but the same is likely true of most or nearly all of us.

And I don't think his attitude is any worse than that of the many silent ones who will just decide that we are wrong and not even care to hear what we say.

But beyond that all, brother, he is a person who IMO means well. I don't meet those nearly as often as I would like to, so I don't feel any great hurry to avoid him.

Actually he is. Someone who is stubborn to remain deluded by seeing his perception within everything is wrong in my view.
And he's not difficult to deal with, he just has to make every single religion Islam, every deity into Allah and every text into the Quran.
And wrong or right is decided by at least going beyond personal bias, which he's incapable of.
Even the worst of people mean well... It's simply their version of "well" isn't a universal one.
In conclusion, watching frozen for the 20th time is better than engaging in a reasonable discussion with him.

One characteristic of a Ahmadiyya Muslim is :

[25:74] And those who, when they are reminded of the Signs* of their Lord, fall not deaf and blind thereat;
http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=25&verse=73​

*verses
We don't have a blind-faith, and are steadfast on the reasonable straight path.
Regards

 

[Subhankar Zac]

One characteristic of a Ahmadiyya Muslim is :

[25:74] And those who, when they are reminded of the Signs* of their Lord, fall not deaf and blind thereat;
http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=25&verse=73​

*verses
We don't have a blind-faith, and are steadfast on the reasonable straight path.
Regards

1. You're blind.
2. Hypocrite and biased.
3. Shoving Islam in every other religion or calling other religions evil and false.
4. Nothing can be reasoned with you.
5. Not all ahhamadiyas can nearly be as hypocritical, blind and intolerant as you.

 

[Vinayaka]

What else m I supposed to do at such stupidity?

Ignore it?

 

[paarsurrey]

paarsurrey said: ↑
@Subhankar Zac
Please don't be angry with me, we all here on RF are a community in itself. If we don't have different viewpoints, we would be machine-made. And we are not that.
Please help me trace out who translated the following passage :
“That which cannot be seen by the eye but through which the eye itself sees, know That to be Brahman (God) and not what people worship here (in the manifested world).”
Kena Upanishad (1.7) Yajurveda

Regards

What else m I supposed to do at such stupidity?

I don't get one, please
Regards

 

[Vinayaka]

I laughed when you 'liked' my post. Subnankar, I know it's tough some days, but hitting your head against a brick wall ... lol. Life has so much more to offer than that.

 

[paarsurrey]

1. You're blind.
2. Hypocrite and biased.
3. Shoving Islam in every other religion or calling other religions evil and false.
4. Nothing can be reasoned with you.
5. Not all ahhamadiyas can nearly be as hypocritical, blind and intolerant as you.

I think one is simply angry. We could talk when one's anger subsides.
I never termed other religions as "evil and false". Did I ever? Please.
Kindly quote from me if I ever said so.
Regards

 

[Subhankar Zac]

I think one is simply angry. We could talk when one's anger subsides.
I never termed other religions as "evil and false". Did I ever? Please.
Kindly quote from me if I ever said so.
Regards

2. Hypocritical (point 2)

 

[Subhankar Zac]

paarsurrey said: ↑
@Subhankar Zac
Please don't be angry with me, we all here on RF are a community in itself. If we don't have different viewpoints, we would be machine-made. And we are not that.
Please help me trace out who translated the following passage :
“That which cannot be seen by the eye but through which the eye itself sees, know That to be Brahman (God) and not what people worship here (in the manifested world).”
Kena Upanishad (1.7) Yajurveda

Regards

I don't get one, please
Regards

Add it to the list!