paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Please don't mind.Every single one? Even the questions I asked?
I think so. Please
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Please don't mind.Every single one? Even the questions I asked?
Fair enough. But I really think you are holding entirely unreasonable expectations then.Please don't mind.
I think so. Please
Regards
Many of the summaries (like Upanisads and Gita) are themselves revealed to the rishis.A summary only a person can make if he had first read the whole. Please name the person who had read all the Hinduism scripture. Right? Please.
Have you read the whole Hinduism scripture yourself to confirm that the summary has been accurately prepared. Right? Please.
Why 8 summaries? Why none just 1 (one)? Please
In the wake of the above"we have them already" is fishy from a "secular"? Right? Please
By summary I would mean to be one page summary, not the whole lot of summaries, as you have suggested.
If you don't have one or cannot prepare one, just let me know, Please. One can borrow from me for a while, please,freely.
Regards
Not even the most Hinduism people have read all the plethora of Hinduism scripture. It must have put the masses in Hinduism at a disadvantage and hence at the mercy of the narrators/scribes/clergy. Right? Please
Please correct me if I am wrong with your reasonable arguments.
Thread is open to everybody of any religion or no religion.
No disrespect intended to any person personally, please. I love all the revealed religions and their people. Please
Regards
@paarsurrey , if I may, this thred may be helpful in giving you a general understanding of Hinduism.
http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/what-is-sampradaya.188104/
Maybe he is not. But I won't deny him the opportunity if I can help it.As if he is interested.
As far as I know, only one is. For sure there is only one who is vocal about it.
Can you give me a link? I'm curious as to who it is.You should check out a previous thread I made. I assure you there is more than one.
Sorry!
First time I agree with my friend.
They should realize that Atheism/Agnosticism/Skepticism has no value in Religion, whatsoever. Buddha gave hardly any weightage to it. Right? Please
In fact Buddha spoke against Skepticism/Agnosticism in very clear terms:
“The BuddhSa was NOT an Agnostic. It is scripturally false to say he was an Agnostic. He was in fact vehemently opposed to Agnosticism and he called them “evasive eel-wrigglers.” See the Brahmajala Sutta and the Samannaphala Sutta.
- Chapter 46:
Avoiding the Ten Evils”Free your mind of ignorance and be anxious to
learn the truth, especially in the one thing that is needful,
lest you fall a prey either , to scepticism or to errors.
Scepticism will make you indifferent and errors will lead
you astray, so that you shall not find the noble path that
leads to life eternal.” Verse -13The Gospel of Buddha- Courtesy our friend Tathagata (post#79) in Religious Forum, must be available in the records of RF.
Kindly excuse me, please.
Regards
I think you had stated that you have studied a lot many Hinduism scriptures. Please correct me if I am wrong. Right?PleaseThat doesn't exactly answer my question. Let me try rephrasing it. How do you define a 'revealed' religion?
Wrt what you say above, how does the Qur'aan guide us to the idea that the Gita or the Gathas (both of which I have read many times, and have a lot of respect for) are Revelations from God?
Also, you seem to be saying that because one enjoys reading the Gita or the Gathas, one knows it is from God? Is this what you are saying?
That doesn't exactly answer my question. Let me try rephrasing it. How do you define a 'revealed' religion?
Wrt what you say above, how does the Qur'aan guide us to the idea that the Gita or the Gathas (both of which I have read many times, and have a lot of respect for) are Revelations from God?
Also, you seem to be saying that because one enjoys reading the Gita or the Gathas, one knows it is from God? Is this what you are saying?
Please provide me the link, if possible.
Link to what? A commentary on the verse? Not sure I understand. Something like this? https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110103013542AAq1XJG
I want to read the verse (Kena Upanishad 1.7) from the Yajur-Veda, directly with its verses in the context, like when I study a verse of Quran which is questioned by someone, I read the verses in the context to understand the specific verse. This approach has never failed me. The scriptures are from G-d, they have a very intricate/plain system that one cannot see if one's insight is blurred. If it is good for Quran, it should be good for the Hinduism scriptures also. Shouldn't it,please?
So please help me to see the verse with the verses in the context for the pleasure of my eyes and heart.
You won't believe me, but all the scriptures of the world of any religion on earth are my own scriptures, human interfering with them excepted. I love them all-the portions/part of them that have not been interfered with. And I can do it with the grace of G-d.
Maybe Yajur-Veda had copied it from Quran, in a specific, dimension. You know in absolute sense no time and or space exist, as both time and or space are the creation of G-d, while G-d is not in them, as He rules them with his attributes and manifest in them with his attributes .
Please
Regards
This is interesting. The text is IMO difficult to parse (at least by me), but the match does seem reasonable.I don't think they do. Please
Regards