Double-blind Prayer Efficacy Test -- Really?

[Sheldon]

how much damage do these proud boys do?

Are you saying white supremacist organisations espousing racism are not pernicious? Seriously?

 

[Sheldon]

how much damage do these proud boys do?

Well since you asked:

"The Proud Boys is an American far-right, neo-fascist, and exclusively male organization that promotes and engages in political violence in the United States. The Proud Boys has been designated as a terrorist group in Canada and New Zealand."

"Five leaders of the group, including its former chairman, were federally indicted on seditious conspiracy charges in June 2022, for their alleged roles in the 2021 United States Capitol attack."

<CITATION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"As of December 31, 2021, 83 Proud Boys members and sympathizers have allegedly carried out ideologically motivated crimes in the United States. This number includes 54 Proud Boys defendants who participated in the Capitol breach on January 6, 2021."

<CITATION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Since its foundation in 2016, members of the Proud Boys, a far-right, neo-fascist, and exclusively male organization, have been involved in a number controversial and violent events. This list contains a number of those events, some of which have resulted in criminal charges being filed against participants."

<CITATION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

[Sheldon]

Let's get one thing straight, SLIPPERY SLOPE ARGUMENTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY FALLACIES,

Yours clearly was.

In Australia the slippery slope was the 'Decriminalize Gays' movement.

Are you saying people should be criminalised just for being gay, or being in a sexual relationship with another consenting adult(s) who happen to be gay? Why?

Various gay groups declared in the media they want nothing more than to be 'left alone' and have no agenda like gay marriage or promoting homosexuality.

What's wrong with homosexuality?

 

[Sheldon]

No, I had to check it out, the book does not describe him performing fellatio on an adult male. It describes the author as a fourth grader and another fourth grader messing around. It is not even vey explicit. Just a bunch of Mrs. Grundy's getting their panties in a knot. I am betting that there are other books describing straight encounters that are not that much different. What bothers people is that it depicts homosexual sex.

In fact here is link to a typical Grundy that shoots down his or her own argument by quoting from the book:

“Lawn Boy” IS pedophilic. Here’s why. (Explicit)

Here is an expurgated quote from it:

"“What if I told you I touched another guy’s richard?” I said. … “What if I told you I (hmm let me think) 'treated it like a straw' it?” … “I was ten years old, but it’s true. I put Doug Goble’s richard in my mouth.” "

That's it. It does not describe an act of pedophilia it describes to 4th graders getting a bit jiggy. Face it, it is the homosexual nature that is so irritating.

Is anyone really surprised she made up this bs yet again?

 

[Sheldon]

Can boys get STD from giving head to an adult male? It should be discussed in class. Any age limit? How about 18 yo? But why stop there, shouldn't ALL boys know this, in case the issue arrises? Let's say 5 yo. 'Now children, I want to discuss what fellatio means, with the view to asking can you get STD from doing this. You see, STD is BAD.' What is happening in this conversation? At least three things
1 - normalizing what was considered immoral - pedophilia
2 - taking education out of the hands of parents
3 - sticking the finger up at religious and conservative sensibilities as a moral and political statement

Since your irrelevant disjointed rant has yet again ignored my post, here it is, see if you can actually address any part of it.

Sheldon said: ↑
So what? Proper and frank sex education has been demonstrated to help drastically reduce the transference of STD's, and of course drastically reduce unwanted pregnancies, which would drastically reduce abortion rates as well. I thought you were in favour of reducing abortions, how about reducing STD's, don't you think this would be a good thing?"

Note there was no mention whatsoever of child abuse, so just another of your irrelevant disjointed rants. We also now know that your claim about a schoolbook denoting child abuse is yet again bs, quelle surprise.

 

[Sheldon]

Many 'harmless' ideologies come from Marxism to Cultural Marxism via people like Gramski and the Frankfurt school of thought. This includes Wokeness today with its oppressed and oppressor narratives. Google Theodor Adorno and his notorious book The Authoratarian Personality - he said that 'tolerance' in the traditional sense actually serves to help oppression - and must be stopped. 'Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements of the Right and tolerance of movements from the Left.'
I like how Jordan Peterson put it, issues like gender 'are just the side show' to this philosophy.

Far right extremists views, like the ones in your posts, peddle endless rhetoric against imaginary foes, like extremists on the left, they lack any sense of perspective, or even a cogent grasp of reality, and the rest of us are left bemused at their idiocy and intolerance.

I sense your diatribes are building towards some sort of fascist apotheosis, but I long ago lost interest in reading these disjointed and irrelevant rants, that appear to have zero interest in debate.

 

[Sheldon]

Should I demand to marry a man and a woman simultaneously - is that not equality too?

Knock yourself out, why would anyone care what consenting adults do with and to each other?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Is anyone really surprised she made up this bs yet again?

Sadly no. There is a tiny bit of "fact" in her accusations, but the whole story refutes the claim

 

[PruePhillip]

Knock yourself out, why would anyone care what consenting adults do with and to each other?

'Cos I have to live in this society.

 

[PruePhillip]

Far right extremists views, like the ones in your posts, peddle endless rhetoric against imaginary foes, like extremists on the left, they lack any sense of perspective, or even a cogent grasp of reality, and the rest of us are left bemused at their idiocy and intolerance.

I sense your diatribes are building towards some sort of fascist apotheosis, but I long ago lost interest in reading these disjointed and irrelevant rants, that appear to have zero interest in debate.

Gramski and Adorno weren't imaginary. I suspect THEIR enemies were imagionary.
The trouble is when people's views have real consequences, and they can promote those views.

 

[PruePhillip]

Since your irrelevant disjointed rant has yet again ignored my post, here it is, see if you can actually address any part of it.
Note there was no mention whatsoever of child abuse, so just another of your irrelevant disjointed rants. We also now know that your claim about a schoolbook denoting child abuse is yet again bs, quelle surprise.

So we have to teach fellatio to children, for the sole issue of getting STD's. Can't we teach little children how to AVOID STD's when performing fellatio on adults?
Bit like teaching kids not to steal 'cos they might get caught. In which there are better ways to go about it.

 

[PruePhillip]

I'm still wondering what is so terrible about tampons.

If it's in relation to the up and coming Disney cartoon there are some serious issues with the tampons
1 - it shows the sexualization of our society
2 - it shows the sexualization of our children
3 - it shows how the woke are controlling board rooms in companies

 

[PruePhillip]

Why are you against polygamy, what in your opinion is harming anyone if consenting adults choose to live in polyamorous relationships?

I recall when people (particularly feminists) viewed polygamy as unnatural and exploitative.
Progressive people said it will never happen, and people who warn about it are religious moralizers with extreme POV's
Times change, now liberals are having second thoughts about polygamy.

What else will people have second thoughts about? I suggest pederasty. When you see school books showing kids giving oral to adults, you know it's coming.

 

[Sheldon]

Sheldon said: ↑
Knock yourself out, why would anyone care what consenting adults do with and to each other?

'Cos I have to live in this society.

So what?

 

[Sheldon]

The trouble is when people's views have real consequences, and they can promote those views.

Yes well I find many of your views repugnant of course, but unlike you I want to live in a free society, and that's a price one has to pay. You still haven't explained why you think is wrong with people being gay?

 

[Sheldon]

So we have to teach fellatio to children, for the sole issue of getting STD's. Can't we teach little children how to AVOID STD's when performing fellatio on adults?
Bit like teaching kids not to steal 'cos they might get caught. In which there are better ways to go about it.

Not much point trying to debate when every response from you is another fantasy induced disjointed rant. Read my post, and respond to it, or don't, but I have little interested in being a sounding board for hate speech, and misinformation. You appear to be trolling more and more with every post now.

 

[Sheldon]

If it's in relation to the up and coming Disney cartoon there are some serious issues with the tampons
1 - it shows the sexualization of our society
2 - it shows the sexualization of our children
3 - it shows how the woke are controlling board rooms in companies

1. No it doesn't
2. No it doesn't
3. No it doesn't

 

[Sheldon]

Sheldon said: ↑
Why are you against polygamy, what in your opinion is harming anyone if consenting adults choose to live in polyamorous relationships?

I recall when people (particularly feminists) viewed polygamy as unnatural and exploitative.

Why are you against polygamy, what in your opinion is harming anyone if consenting adults choose to live in polyamorous relationships?

Progressive people said it will never happen, and people who warn about it are religious moralizers with extreme POV's
Times change, now liberals are having second thoughts about polygamy.

Why are you against polygamy, what in your opinion is harming anyone if consenting adults choose to live in polyamorous relationships?

What else will people have second thoughts about? I suggest pederasty. When you see school books showing kids giving oral to adults, you know it's coming.

Why are you against polygamy, what in your opinion is harming anyone if consenting adults choose to live in polyamorous relationships?

Why are you against polygamy, what in your opinion is harming anyone if consenting adults choose to live in polyamorous relationships?

Why are you against polygamy, what in your opinion is harming anyone if consenting adults choose to live in polyamorous relationships?

Why are you against polygamy, what in your opinion is harming anyone if consenting adults choose to live in polyamorous relationships?

 

[Subduction Zone]

So we have to teach fellatio to children, for the sole issue of getting STD's. Can't we teach little children how to AVOID STD's when performing fellatio on adults?
Bit like teaching kids not to steal 'cos they might get caught. In which there are better ways to go about it.

Are you going back to that story where you believed a lie about Lawn Boy? After I showed you how that was a lie? Shame on you. You were fooled the first time because a liar told you what you wanted to hear. But to go back to the liar after it was shown to be a lie is unforgivable.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I recall when people (particularly feminists) viewed polygamy as unnatural and exploitative.
Progressive people said it will never happen, and people who warn about it are religious moralizers with extreme POV's
Times change, now liberals are having second thoughts about polygamy.

What else will people have second thoughts about? I suggest pederasty. When you see school books showing kids giving oral to adults, you know it's coming.

Prue, what book are you talking about? There WAS NO BOOK WHERE A KID GAVE A BJ TO AN ADULT.