E Vs C. Really now???

[syo]

The creation story is about the whole world, though, not just about the angels and Adam and Eve, however you want to characterise them.

What do you mean? What whole world?

 

[exchemist]

What do you mean? What whole world?

Light and darkness, sun and moon, water, dry land and sky, plants and animals. Creation of all these is described. Creationism treats the manner in which this is described as literal, whereas mainstream Christianity and Judaism treat it as allegorical.

 

[syo]

Light and darkness, sun and moon, water, dry land and sky, plants and animals. Creation of all these is described. Creationism treats the manner in which this is described as literal, whereas mainstream Christianity and Judaism treat it as allegorical.

Nah.

 

[YoursTrue]

Evolution is about MORTALS.

Creationism is about IMMORTALS.

Before I say no, it isn't about IMMORTALS, I'd like to know what you're talking about. But I have another question about evolution, so I'll ask in another post, if you will.

 

[YoursTrue]

My question is, since the topic is evolution vs. whatever someone thinks is "creationism," I am reading somewhat about "Neanderthal" dna and whatever other dna humans are supposed to maybe have -- and believe it or not, it has been said that those with Neanderthal dna are prone to depression. And more. Really? Really??? (lolol...) how do people know what neanderthal dna is? - Bing

 

[Yazata]

Evolution is about MORTALS.

One can argue that life itself is immortal. It's existed without a break or a gap ever since the origin of life. What we think of as individual organisms can be thought of as transitory fruiting bodies that the immortal chain of life generates periodically in order to branch out, change and evolve.

Creationism is about IMMORTALS.

It most commonly seems to posit a Creator that is outside space and time. Eternal, but not exactly immortal.

It seems to me that creationism is more about design than mortality/immortality.

The two aren't comparable.

For Gods' sake!

I don't understand the point you are making.

 

[syo]

Before I say no, it isn't about IMMORTALS, I'd like to know what you're talking about. But I have another question about evolution, so I'll ask in another post, if you will.

Genesis is mythology.

 

[syo]

One can argue that life itself is immortal. It's existed without a break or a gap ever since the origin of life. What we think of as individual organisms can be thought of as transitory fruiting bodies that the immortal chain of life generates periodically in order to branch out, change and evolve.


It most commonly seems to posit a Creator that is outside space and time. Eternal, but not exactly immortal.

It seems to me that creationism is more about design than mortality/immortality.


I don't understand the point you are making.

And I try to understand evolution. Probably a waste of time.

 

[LuisDantas]

Evolution is about MORTALS.

Creationism is about IMMORTALS.

The two aren't comparable.

For Gods' sake!

Creationism tends to make claims about the origin of mortal beings, though.

 

[syo]

Creationism tends to make claims about the origin of mortal beings, though.

Not origin. Ending.

 

[LuisDantas]

Not origin. Ending.

Can you elaborate?

 

[syo]

Can you elaborate?

Genesis is myth. Gods and Heroes. Adam isn't and never was a mortal man like you. Adam is myth, a hero. Eve is a heroin. God and Adam react. If you think Adam is the first you, think again. A foul trick played by modern abrahamics. Adam never walked in history on our current damned planet, for gods' sake!

 

[LuisDantas]

Genesis is myth. Gods and Heroes. Adam isn't and never was a mortal man like you. Adam is myth, a hero. Eve is a heroin. God and Adam react. If you think Adam is the first you, think again. A foul trick played by modern abrahamics. Adam never walked in history on our current damned planet, for gods' sake!

Isn't that incompatible with creationism, though?

 

[syo]

Isn't that incompatible with creationism, though?

What do you mean? Creationism of modern abrahamics you mean? Of course it's incompatible. Christian creationism is a fraud. They say Adam is an historical figure, the first us. PUKE.

 

[YoursTrue]

One can argue that life itself is immortal. It's existed without a break or a gap ever since the origin of life. What we think of as individual organisms can be thought of as transitory fruiting bodies that the immortal chain of life generates periodically in order to branch out, change and evolve.


It most commonly seems to posit a Creator that is outside space and time. Eternal, but not exactly immortal.

It seems to me that creationism is more about design than mortality/immortality.


I don't understand the point you are making.

According to what I understand about evolution, everything dies. Right?

 

[YoursTrue]

What do you mean? Creationism of modern abrahamics you mean? Of course it's incompatible. Christian creationism is a fraud. They say Adam is an historical figure, the first us. PUKE.

Maybe you like your ancestors being fish better?

 

[YoursTrue]

Genesis is myth. Gods and Heroes. Adam isn't and never was a mortal man like you. Adam is myth, a hero. Eve is a heroin. God and Adam react. If you think Adam is the first you, think again. A foul trick played by modern abrahamics. Adam never walked in history on our current damned planet, for gods' sake!

You're not even making sense. Try to connect reason with your statements, thank you

 

[syo]

Maybe you like your ancestors being fish better?

Apes.

 

[syo]

You're not even making sense. Try to connect reason with your statements, thank you

You want reason? The dead will rise!

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

If God created the universe I don’t think he’d have any problems making a little video. Hahaha

I wonder that you can't even begin to see the spectacular inanity of such a remark.