• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

E Vs C. Really now???

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
You want reason? The dead will rise! :eek:
The Bible repeatedly confirms that the dead will rise. As a matter of fact, human dead will rise, nothing about goats, sheep, caterpillars, (or apes) anyway.
 

Jimmy

King Phenomenon
I wonder that you can't even begin to see the spectacular inanity of such a remark.
Haha look around! Life is pretty unbelievable. For such events, the ones I believe in, to occur is easily believed. Child’s play. I don’t even have to easily believe them, I just know they’re the truth. It’s only life man. No big deal. The unbelievable and unexplainable does exist my friend. It’s just the way it is. Sorry you can’t see it. It’s so amazing. I’m so blessed to see the truth.
 

Jimmy

King Phenomenon
The Bible repeatedly confirms that the dead will rise. As a matter of fact, human dead will rise, nothing about goats, sheep, caterpillars, (or apes) anyway.
When the Bible says a new world I think that covers a goat. Hahaha
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The Bible repeatedly confirms that the dead will rise. As a matter of fact, human dead will rise, nothing about goats, sheep, caterpillars, (or apes) anyway.
It claims that. Until you demonstrate that the Bible is reliable one cannot say that it confirms it.
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
It claims that. Until you demonstrate that the Bible is reliable one cannot say that it confirms it.
Good for you! You're making progress. Yes, the Bible continually talks from Moses' writings onward over many centuries of compilation that -- life is given by God, and the dead (humans) can rise. From the dead.
Meanwhile, in terms of what you accept as reliability, you might as well go back to the theory of evolution to demonstrate that not one iota of evidence shows that fish eventually morphed (I mean evolved) to become humans. I'm not talking about theories. :) Have a good one!
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Good for you! You're making progress. Yes, the Bible continually talks from Moses' writings onward over many centuries of compilation that -- life is given by God, and the dead (humans) can rise. From the dead.
Moses is not considered to have been a real person by historians, so mentioning Moses as a writer is an error in an argument. But it doesn't matter because interpreting anything in the Bible in a way that is contrary to fact and reality is absurd. Dead people don't come back to life. It's a fact.
Meanwhile, in terms of what you accept as reliability, you might as well go back to the theory of evolution to demonstrate that not one iota of evidence shows that fish eventually morphed (I mean evolved) to become humans. I'm not talking about theories. :) Have a good one!
Why not just accept what experts report? Religious zealots certainly have no right to reject experts in debate and think it valid. Experts are cited as evidence in debates, and creationists have o experts, and fail because they reject experts.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Good for you! You're making progress. Yes, the Bible continually talks from Moses' writings onward over many centuries of compilation that -- life is given by God, and the dead (humans) can rise. From the dead.
Meanwhile, in terms of what you accept as reliability, you might as well go back to the theory of evolution to demonstrate that not one iota of evidence shows that fish eventually morphed (I mean evolved) to become humans. I'm not talking about theories. :) Have a good one!
Been there done that. Your inability to understand is not a refutation. Many have tried which indicates that the problem appears to be with you and not with the theory or the evidence.

The problem is that you make ridiculous claims that are so bad even you won't try to support them. For example you just claimed that Moses wrote parts of the Bible. How would you support that claim? Using the Bible is merely circular reasoning, especially since you cannot show that it is reliable. Meanwhile the Moses myths should have left endless evidence behind yet none is to be found. That is why anthropologists have no problem claiming that the Moses of the Bible is legendary at best.
 
Top