Jimmy
King Phenomenon
Who said u need eyes to look?remember what Jesus said...if they claim to see they are blind. Certain types.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Who said u need eyes to look?remember what Jesus said...if they claim to see they are blind. Certain types.
I feel god above all else. God comforts.That's right, Moon claims to see God. And don't you claim to see creation, not evolved organizisms?
I see a bit more. Actually I see a lot more.All I see is a natural existence that resulted from Natural Laws and processes.
I suggest more thinking.I feel god above all else. God comforts.
“And be a simple kind of manI suggest more thinking.
You appear to be making up what you are seeing.I see a bit more. Actually I see a lot more.
I see a bit more. Actually I see a lot more.
I love lions.The Bible repeatedly confirms that the dead will rise. As a matter of fact, human dead will rise, nothing about goats, sheep, caterpillars, (or apes) anyway.
And more back?If you go back far enough they were fish.
It is wat you believe without evidence.
I'm reminded of a little poem I came across many years back ─remember what Jesus said...if they claim to see they are blind. Certain types.
Only one is right, including the science of evolution.You may, but not objectively with your eyes or senses, but from the subjective view of belief where there are many alternative diverse conflicting beliefs of others. Nothing consistent here concerning what one believes.
As per the subject of the thread, The science of evolution have been objectively falsified beyond any reasonable doubt. The many diverse conflicting beliefs of Creation are an illusion of subjectivity, and for the mast part based on ancient tribal scripture without provenance or science,
Well, ah . . . the science of evolution is the only hypothesis that fits any evidence, but nonetheless, a 'Source' some call God(S) may exist and Created our physical existence, but IF God exists God Created our physical existence and Natural Laws, and left behind no evidence for God's existence that we can literally 'see.'Only one is right, including the science of evolution.
Paul calls that 'faith.' I don't know why creationists can't just accept that. Why try to sound all 'sciency?' I suspect it is a way for them to deal with their cognitive dissonance.
If one goes far enough back single celled organisms. Did you not know that?And more back?
Unfortunately cognitive dissonance keeps creationists from understanding that they are calling God a liar. In fact when I ask them that they more often than not twist the question and seem to think that I am calling God a liar. The person that you responded to does not understand your point and may never do so.The cognitive dissonance is not with scientists, but with those that take faith in ancient tribal scripture in asserting the rejection of science.
IF God exists God did not Create false physical evidence concerning the nature of our existence. Of course, God does not lie.
That simply is not true. But anyway take care. Bye.Paul calls that 'faith.' I don't know why creationists can't just accept that. Why try to sound all 'sciency?' I suspect it is a way for them to deal with their cognitive dissonance.
Yeah and then they morphed into male and female and got married.If one goes far enough back single celled organisms. Did you not know that?
You say "Bye" far to often plying 'Duck, Bob and Weasel' without a coherent response.That simply is not true. But anyway take care. Bye.
Sorry u feel that wayWell, ah . . . the science of evolution is the only hypothesis that fits any evidence, but nonetheless, a 'Source' some call God(S) may exist and Created our physical existence, but IF God exists God Created our physical existence and Natural Laws, and left behind no evidence for God's existence that we can literally 'see.'