We Never Know
No Slack
20% of a 1000 isnt a few1 in 5 is few relative to 4 in 5.
Let this not become quibbling over word choice, eh.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
20% of a 1000 isnt a few1 in 5 is few relative to 4 in 5.
Let this not become quibbling over word choice, eh.
They might die.Yeah, I get it. Let them die because their lives don't matter in your eyes.
I won't be addressing every hypothetical you guysAre you saying a vaccinated person comes before...
-the drunk driver
-addict that OD'd
-the person choosing to eat twinkies and skittles instead of a healthy diet
-the depressed person who tried to commit suicide
-etc
1 in 5 is few relative to 4 in 5.
Let this not become quibbling over word choice, eh.
No, I'd treat the ones with the most need, all things else being equal. No one would be left out to die, if I can help it. You are actually setting out to let people die.They might die.
With your way, you'd give priority to anti-vaxers,
& let different people die.
They might die.
With your way, you'd give priority to anti-vaxers,
& let different people die.
Depends on what they come in for. If they come in with a case of COVID and aren't preventing alarming symptoms, they should be triaged accordingly.Why shouldn't the vaccinated come last. They have been vaccinated and have some protection.
I expect a draft by tomorrow morning!I haven't yet formalized my hospital admission protocols yet.
But the evening is young.
Why not?It's not true that unvaccinated are putting people in danger.
I made no such argument.How can you not take it personally when someone is prejudiced against you so much they want you to be sick?
You're ignoring how "few" refers to relative fractions.20% of a 1000 isnt a few
I won't be addressing every hypothetical you guys
present. But I'd prioritize based upon those factors
too in times resource shortage.
That is to pose the issue such that it eliminatesNo one would be left out to die, if I can help it.
You're ignoring how "few" refers to relative fractions.
But I sense this is intentional.
If you want to continue with me, please respond thoughtfully.
These guys keep posting to me.I expect a draft by tomorrow morning!
The trick is to propose a hypothetical. Then they put you on their ignore list.These guys keep posting to me.
I'd have to stop responding.
I'm too compulsive for that.
I would not attempt to offer one. I am simply open minded enough to listen before judging them.I am curious. What do you think is a wise argument against the vaccine? (Save for medical complications due to allergic reactions, etc.)
People will always die. We should try to help all those who need it, and there's always a way. However, you don't even want to try.That is to pose the issue such that it eliminates
the problem of having to prioritize.
You keep making it personal & negative.However, you don't even want to try.
After the things I've read, I'm better off not understanding.It seems that you don't want to understand.