eternal universe?

[Ben Dhyan]

Except spirit is nothing more than either superstition or myth, or it is a superstitious delusion.

Energy is either (A) measurable, therefore verifiable (evidence), or (B) it is capable of being solve mathematically, therefore provable (proof).

Spirit is neither of these two.

And when you try to mix science and religion together, as you (and thief) do, you get psuedoscience mumbo-jumbo.

You are not making sense...if I state the case that spirit and zpe are two separate names to represent the same reality....by saying that spirit is a myth, you are implying that zpe is also?

 

[Oldsoul]

So you accept the cyclic model or oscillating model, otherwise known as the Big Bounce.

Big Bang?
Then
Big Bounce?

The story of my love life..

*Tear*

 

[gnostic]

You are not making sense...if I state the case that spirit and zpe are two separate names to represent the same reality....by saying that spirit is a myth, you are implying that zpe is also?

Unless you are talking about alcohol, spirits are myths.

As to zero-point energy, it is energy in quantum physics, in which energy is at its lowest state, otherwise known as "ground state".

They are not same, and have never been the same. And just because you are linking the two as one-and-the-same, doesn't mean they are.

What make think you know what you are talking about.

Again, you are making claims, which you cannot substantiate, and I think, like Aquitaine in the other thread, that I have wasted enough of my time on your arrogant and empty delusion.

 

[gnostic]

Big Bang?
Then
Big Bounce?

The story of my love life..

*Tear*

I'd wonder what you would say about your love life with the Big Crunch, Big Freeze or the Big Rip?

 

[Ben Dhyan]

Unless you are talking about alcohol, spirits are myths.

As to zero-point energy, it is energy in quantum physics, in which energy is at its lowest state, otherwise known as "ground state".

They are not same, and have never been the same. And just because you are linking the two as one-and-the-same, doesn't mean they are.

What make think you know what you are talking about.

Again, you are making claims, which you cannot substantiate, and I think, like Aquitaine in the other thread, that I have wasted enough of my time on your arrogant and empty delusion.

Not so fast buster....you have yet to respond to my post on the other thread about pre time = 0 and the singularity... I am expecting an answer and you know I am persistent....so..

As to this exchange...it is going no where because you think it is the name that is real, not the real that the names represent...