And why are you sure that there weren't mechanical special effects?I hear ya loud and clear...
I really do not detect any superimposed images or any trace of computer generated materials on that video...
Usually you can see a clear outline of a computer generated graphic...
I notice details in things that others might not, even the smallest of details.
There are no flaws or imperfections in that video, which can be seen in computer generated films.
There are usually motions that don't add up to real life situations, etc. etc...
For example. it would be a simple matter to attach a Host to a jumping toy like this one:
It sits motionless for a while, then pops up an inch or so, then stays motionless... does that sound familiar?
Let's consider three possibilities that I think cover all the possibilities presented so far:
- there was an actual miracle, and the Host really did levitate all on its own.
- the Host physically "levitated", but it was through some sort of trickery.
- the Host did not levitate, but the image of it is somehow not accurate to what happened.
As you've alluded to, the first possibility requires some deception, or at least misdirection, on the part of the celebrants. Why exclude possibility #2, then?
Hopefully, you can see that it would be physically easy to fake the "miracle", so the only reason I can think of to not consider this possibility would be a belief that these fine, upstanding priests would not be willing to deceive the parishoners and viewers... but you've already discounted that idea to allow for possibility #1.
No matter how many mental leaps you had to make to accept this as a miracle, it was always more rational to assume it to be fake.