Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Already that monument for reunification in North Korea has been taken down by Kimmy and the 'cold war' between these countries is really ramping up to the point where some experts are saying Kimmy already has made a decision to go to war at some point.
Yeah it's just an observation based on my experiences and you seem to be going to the same thing that I've been going through.
It's hard to imagine it not going nuclear.
Just answer the question: if Trump loses and tells you supporters to attack the USA (like government buildings, officials, law enforcement) would you do it?
Oh man! I've been sitting here waiting so long for you to reply, and i thought you were using all this time 2 give me well thought out definitions of the words I asked you about so I could give you an answer that would satisfy us both.
So not all that dedicated to Trump after all. Good.
Yeah you would think it would be Russia, China, or some other large major country where you think major wars will occur,
See? If I don't give you an answer before words are properly defined, then you invent an answer and put words in my mouth.
What amazes me is that even though Kim has proven the technology he has by detonating nuclear weapons underground, and then developing rocket technology to where they can put a spy satellite in orbit, people are still quick to trivialize what North Korea could do to places, including the United states, if they decided to go to war. They still say stupid things like, "NK can't even get a rocket off the ground!"
Hey wow, Trump didn't invade Ukraine! Well, we'll have to forgive him for the attack on the Capitol, the lies about valuations, about the election ─ about everything really ─ , the attempts to corrupt public officials, the refusals to take responsibility for his crimes, the childishness and narcissism, the bullying and threatening, the whoring.
Sorry, I forgot what type of person I was attempting to have a discussion with.
I find that when I'm dealing with a poster who refuses to answer a question, the best course of action after one or two posts like that one that make the evasion or deflection explicit is to simply answer the question for him according to your best understanding of what it is he is likely hiding, offer him a chance to make any corrections if he wants any input into the matter, and move on. In this case, the likeliest possibility for why he refuses to answer is that he would commit violence against his neighbors at Trump's behest, or at a minimum, the possibility is not off the table for him, and he understands how that would be received and prefers to not hear it. What else is reasonably accounts for that choice?
Define "define."
Yes, it is, although pastime is probably a better word than sport or even game, since it's not really a competition. Critical thinkers enjoy honing their critical thinking skills, and this is an excellent opportunity for that. And since religious, conservative, and unskilled in critical thought cluster in the same individuals, and humanistic values and methods in those leaning toward liberalism and irreligiosity, you get these debates in science (evolution vs creationism) and philosophy (empiricism vs faith, free will vs illusion).
Perhaps the replies you get don't satisfy your expectations and maybe liberal thought in general simply offends you, but why is that anybody else's concern? If you're referring to personal commentary about Trump, of course you're not going to like what you read from the contingent that finds the man morally reprehensible. Look at the material they have to comment on - Trump's torts and crimes, his personality, his ignorance, his mouth, his nonstop raging, his authoritarian tendencies, his lust for power and revenge, his constant lying, and his now rapidly progressing cognitive decline.
No doubt a flawed withdrawl from Trump's date to leave to the military pulling out troops to levels that could not control the environment.
Oh, you mean the war that Russia failed to win in a few months, and that Ukraine is pushing Russia back? It has been a stalemate over winter which isn't unusual. But MAGAs in congress want to end aid for Ukraine. Is that to hurt Ukraine by hurting Biden?
As if Biden is the prime minister of Israel. The USA gives aid to Israel as a foreign policy standard. The additional aid has been conditioned with requests that Israel use moral tactics. Israel has refused, and even rebuked a UN directive. It's a no win situation between Hamas and Israel, and I hope Biden refuses more aid until there's a cease fire.
And a booming economy, which was Trump/republicans whole strategy when they passed the 2017 tax cuts. They claimed there would be added revenue from the improved economy. So are you saying this Trump/republican strategy failed, and Biden should raise taxes so we can raise revenue? It doesn't happen by magic.
Typical right wing scare tactics.
So far you have cited false items as your "disasterous" Biden presidency. Don't you have any truthful data or facts?
www.commonfund.org
What four years of disaster? Once again. like Obama, he was handed an economy that was terribly hampered by world events. I do not blame Trump for the virus at all, but his handling of it was not ideal. He should have trusted his experts a bit more an learned how to keep his mouth shut. Ironically he only harmed future Republican aspirations since the reluctance to take the vaccine was largely due to his incompetence and strong Republican areas had higher death rates even when one took age into consideration.
Who is the one lacking in truthfull data or facts ? By all acounts the pullout of Afghanistan was a disaster .. crying out that Trump would have done something different does not change that truth ?
Sorry that you disapprove of how the legal system decides matter to mete out justice, but yours is not the only opinion, and not the one that decided or will decide how these matters are determined. I find the process just, and I trust my intuition there.
I'm not in your club. I understand what punitive damages are quite well. It's a very simple concept. I explained it to you.
You try to find a number that modifies future behavior. The first award of $5 million was approximately $2 million in compensatory damages and $3 million in punitive damages, and had no effect on Trump's subsequent behavior. The $83 million second judgement was about $18 million compensatory and $65 million punitive. I
You are offended by the size of the judgments against the likes of Giuliani, Trump, A Jones, and Fox News. I consider them just. Lesser amounts would be ineffective as disincentives to people of great means.
Disagree. Once again, you don't set these standards except for yourself.