Ella S.
Well-Known Member
Continued from this post:
Why I’m not atheist or agnostic.
I would like sources for each of your following claims:
On top of that, you are incorrect that NDEs being "vivid dreams caused by losing consciousness when your brain is low on oxygen" is a theory. It's a sustained working hypothesis. That means that it's supported by evidence and experimentation. It could be wrong, but you would have to provide evidence that falsifies it.
I have seen the "miracle of the sun," but by your own definition a miracle is:
I am not sure how the "miracle of the sun" counts as a miracle by your definition. Can you prove that the "miracle of the sun" had a supernatural or praternatural cause?
Why I’m not atheist or agnostic.
.
Ella S. People have discovered relatives they did not know they had in their NDE!
FACT: The cave man believed in an "After Life"!.... PROVING man has always believed in an "After Life"!
You say... vivid dreams caused by losing consciousness when your brain is low on oxygen. I reply: What you say is just a THEORY there is NO scientific proof to make it a FACT!
Ella S There are MIRACLES; Miracles are another Evidence! You said you believe in "evidentialism"!
You cannot deny people all over the world, in every century have experienced Miracles!
In "Google" type "Miracle of the Sun" see for yourself! Thousands of people witnessed this MIRACLE! This is just one of many thousands of Miracles that people have experienced over the centuries!!
Miracles are attributed to God!
I (Dogknox20) believe; if the Evidence hit you on the back of the head you would still deny it as non-evidence!!!
I would like sources for each of your following claims:
- That people have discovered relatives they did not know they had in NDEs
- That all "cave men" believed in an afterlife (since as far as I'm aware, the specifics of Neolithic religion remain mysterious to us, but several ancient religions did not have a concept of an afterlife)
On top of that, you are incorrect that NDEs being "vivid dreams caused by losing consciousness when your brain is low on oxygen" is a theory. It's a sustained working hypothesis. That means that it's supported by evidence and experimentation. It could be wrong, but you would have to provide evidence that falsifies it.
I have seen the "miracle of the sun," but by your own definition a miracle is:
A miracle is an event that seems inexplicable by natural or scientific laws[2] and accordingly gets attributed to some supernatural or praeternatural cause. Various religions often attribute a phenomenon characterized as miraculous to the actions of a supernatural being, (especially) a deity, a magician, a miracle worker, a saint, or a religious leader. ETC..
I am not sure how the "miracle of the sun" counts as a miracle by your definition. Can you prove that the "miracle of the sun" had a supernatural or praternatural cause?