Little Dragon
Well-Known Member
Evolution via natural selection, relies on more than just fossils. Genetics primarily, DNA analysis.Anything showing the evolution of substances beyond theory?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Evolution via natural selection, relies on more than just fossils. Genetics primarily, DNA analysis.Anything showing the evolution of substances beyond theory?
Please, how do you really know how there was merely a transition from soft worms per se to molluscs and such? By the way, are chimpanzees and gorillas etc.noticed to be transitioning?There was no explosion of forms, there was merely a transition from mostly soft bodied organisms like worms and others, to lifeforms with hard bodied forms, like bivalves and molluscs and also soft bodied forms.
We have fossils from before the Cambrian era, which are indeed complex multicellular animals. They existed. Unlike your evidence for anything you post.
Since you're saying these things, can you give more details please as to how this transpired?Evolution via natural selection, relies on more than just fossils. Genetics primarily, DNA analysis.
I wasn't there at the time. So I can only theorize. Chimps are transitioning now? This trans rights thing is going too far imo.Please, how do you really know how there was merely a transition from soft worms per se to molluscs and such? By the way, are chimpanzees and gorillas etc.noticed to be transitioning?
Now you demonstrated that you do not know what a scientific theory is. There is almost nothing in the world mire reliable than a modern scientific theory. Do you realize that gravity is just a theory?Anything showing the evolution of substances beyond theory?
I can signpost you to the appropriate resources, that can provide better detail and references than I could.Since you're saying these things, can you give more details please as to how this transpired?
All true. Theory is testable and evidenced, of course.Now you demonstrated that you do not know what a scientific theory is. There is almost nothing in the world than a modern scientific theory. Do you realize that gravity is just a theory?
Stupid tablet. Somehow my "more reliable" disappeared from my post. I edited my post when I saw my error in your quote.All true. Theory is testable and evidenced, of course.
Um, that post wasn't directed toward you but let's not pretend you've proven anything here, okay?I have already proved that the God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago without evolution.
I did with MI and the using the LNC. End Proof. QED 2x
So RIP evolution, billions of years, and the Big Bang.
Yep. I've already watched this show many times before. I've even participated a few of those times.No they haven’t! Not on that particular piece of evidence! Very simple way to prove me wrong: do a search on RF & post them. No one’s ever provided me with a solid & reasoned explanation of how those innumerable animals were encased within the Permafrost! Even from scientific sources I’ve never read a logical explanation. They don’t know.
And I just don’t “disappear”, lol!
I don’t know about you, but I’ve got responsibilities to care for; my life does not revolve around RF.
Prove me wrong. (I know you would love to!) Otherwise, you’ve just lied.
I’ll be waiting.
Thanks, I am doing great.Um, that post wasn't directed toward you but let's not pretend you've proven anything here, okay?
The Genesis account tells us that the Source of the Flood wasn’t physical….There's plenty of ways such could happen. Blizzards for example.
That and off course:
- animals frozen in permafrost in no way support a physically impossible flood model
- "we don't know how they were fast-frozen" is not a valid way to argue for a physically impossible flood model
Evolution and billions of years died from stupidity.The Genesis account tells us that the Source of the Flood wasn’t physical….
According to Genesis…
Who gave the warning, 120 years in advance, that a Flood was coming?
As the account tells us, Jehovah.
Who gave Noah the instructions, including the Ark’s ideal dimension ratios?
— Jehovah.
Who brought the waters down from above, and opened the “vast springs” below?
Again, Jehovah.
Who closed the Ark’s door?
— Jehovah.
Who gave the writer of Genesis the information that the tallest mountain (at that time) was covered by 15 cubits of water?
— Jehovah.
And after the event, Who opened the door?
Once again — Jehovah.
(You are aware of this, right?)
So since the account specifically tells us Jehovah God was the One who brought this cataclysm, to persist in applying physical parameters to something clearly described as a supernatural event, is inane.
The Permafrost consists of, not just ice, but also soil and sometimes gravel & sand. So we’re talking about some kind of turbulence, to cause this mix.
Blizzards don't disturb soil; it doesn’t cut it as an explanation.
Evidence of NOAH's FLOOD
You didn’t answer my question… you don’t believe the rain would manifest as ice & snow in the extreme northern latitudes? If not, why not? See my post. You need to answer more questions about your "model".www.religiousforums.com
But unless you can tell us what happened to the 14 members of each dinosaur species after they left Noah's boat less than 4000 years ago then your hypotheses are just pure fantasy.I have already put up 2 infallible proofs that the Bible is the word of God, that God cerated everything in 6 days about 6000 years ago, without evolution and falsified billions of years also.
I have given my challenge that no one has met.
I have my many required questions which no one has an answer to any.
I have shown advanced scientific knowledge from the Bible and very many amazing predictions from the Bible that have come true in exact detail and exact timing the have come true in our very time.
How does one explain polystrate trees?But unless you can tell us what happened to the 14 members of each dinosaur species after they left Noah's boat less than 4000 years ago then your hypotheses are just pure fantasy.
Can you do me a favor? Please do not link any old arguments where your donkey was handed to you to wear on your head.The Genesis account tells us that the Source of the Flood wasn’t physical….
According to Genesis…
Who gave the warning, 120 years in advance, that a Flood was coming?
As the account tells us, Jehovah.
Who gave Noah the instructions, including the Ark’s ideal dimension ratios?
— Jehovah.
Who brought the waters down from above, and opened the “vast springs” below?
Again, Jehovah.
Who closed the Ark’s door?
— Jehovah.
Who gave the writer of Genesis the information that the tallest mountain (at that time) was covered by 15 cubits of water?
— Jehovah.
And after the event, Who opened the door?
Once again — Jehovah.
(You are aware of this, right?)
So since the account specifically tells us Jehovah God was the One who brought this cataclysm, to persist in applying physical parameters to something clearly described as a supernatural event, is inane.
The Permafrost consists of, not just ice, but also soil and sometimes gravel & sand. So we’re talking about some kind of turbulence, to cause this mix.
Blizzards don't disturb soil; it doesn’t cut it as an explanation.
Evidence of NOAH's FLOOD
You didn’t answer my question… you don’t believe the rain would manifest as ice & snow in the extreme northern latitudes? If not, why not? See my post. You need to answer more questions about your "model".www.religiousforums.com
The bible, however, clearly says that flood was only 15 cubits high, and does not say that Mt Everest or even Mt Ararat was covered by 15 cubits.The Genesis account tells us that the Source of the Flood wasn’t physical….
According to Genesis…
Who gave the warning, 120 years in advance, that a Flood was coming?
As the account tells us, Jehovah.
Who gave Noah the instructions, including the Ark’s ideal dimension ratios?
— Jehovah.
Who brought the waters down from above, and opened the “vast springs” below?
Again, Jehovah.
Who closed the Ark’s door?
— Jehovah.
Who gave the writer of Genesis the information that the tallest mountain (at that time) was covered by 15 cubits of water?
— Jehovah.
And after the event, Who opened the door?
Once again — Jehovah.
(You are aware of this, right?)
So since the account specifically tells us Jehovah God was the One who brought this cataclysm, to persist in applying physical parameters to something clearly described as a supernatural event, is inane.
The Permafrost consists of, not just ice, but also soil and sometimes gravel & sand. So we’re talking about some kind of turbulence, to cause this mix.
Blizzards don't disturb soil; it doesn’t cut it as an explanation.
Evidence of NOAH's FLOOD
You didn’t answer my question… you don’t believe the rain would manifest as ice & snow in the extreme northern latitudes? If not, why not? See my post. You need to answer more questions about your "model".www.religiousforums.com
Easily.How does one explain polystrate trees?
And???Easily.
Are they plastic christmas trees or are they what Noah fed the thousands of dinosaurs on his boat?How does one explain polystrate trees?