Evidence of NOAH's FLOOD

[SavedByTheLord]

No you didn't.
Not even close.
And repeating this lie over and over does not make it any truer.

What was the first living thing?
Surely you all knowing evolutionists know this.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What was the first living thing?
Surely you all knowing evolutionists know this.

This is a totally different thread. You really should not be even commenting here since you do not understand the concept of evidence. But then neither did the OP.

 

[McBell]

What was the first living thing?
Surely you all knowing evolutionists know this.

more name calling.
you just can't stop yourself, can you?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

more name calling.
you just can't stop yourself, can you?

False accusations from you again.
But since you have no answers to the origin of anything, what is left?
What was the first living creature and what features did it have?
Where and when did it come into being?

 

[McBell]

False accusations from you again.

Except that the only thing false about it is your bold face lie that it is a false accusation.

But since you have no answers to the origin of anything, what is left?
What was the first living creature and what features did it have?
Where and when did it come into being?

Do hungry crows have ravenous appetites?
If a parsley farmer is sued, can they garnish his wages?
Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Except that the only thing false about it is your bold face lie that it is a false accusation.


Do hungry crows have ravenous appetites?
If a parsley farmer is sued, can they garnish his wages?
Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?

What caused the Big Bang?

 

[McBell]

What caused the Big Bang?

If a parsley farmer is sued, can they garnish his wages?

 

[Ebionite]

It's evidence that Mt Everest and the Himalayas were formed about 50 million years ago when the Indo-Australian plate collided with the Eurasian Plate

That doesn't fit with the model of how subduction zones are supposed to work.

 

[blü 2]

What was the first living thing?
Surely you all knowing evolutionists know this.

It was a combination of biochemicals capable of reproducing itself. Thus the reproductions were capable of reproducing themselves too, and so on.

When? The earliest fossil evidence is from more than 3.5 bn years ago. So some time before that.

Did you enjoy reading that link I gave you about radiometric dating, by the way?

 

[Monty]

That doesn't fit with the model of how subduction zones are supposed to work.

So how was Mt Everest and the Himalayas formed if not from the collision of the Indo-Australian plate with the Eurasian plate about 50 million years ago, and why Australia is still moving Northward at the rate of ~70mm/year, and why the Himalayas are rising by about 3 mm/year?
My understanding is that the Himalayas were formed on the collision zone when the Indian subcontinent collided with the Asian continent and is different to the nearby Java Trench which is a subduction zone between the Eurasian plate and the northward moving Indo-Australian plate. And similarly there is a collision zone and not a subduction zone where the African plate is colliding with the Eurasian plate and the African continent is colliding with the Europe-Asian continent.

 

[Ebionite]

So how was Mt Everest and the Himalayas formed if not from the collision of the Indo-Australian plate with the Eurasian plate about 50 million years ago

It's a compression zone. The only place that the crust can go to relieve the stress is up.

why Australia is still moving Northward at the rate of ~70mm/year

The plate is being pushed up by the difference in thickness between the plastic-like undersea areas. The expansion rift to the south of Australia is to source of the greater crustal thickness relative to Australia's northern ocean.

and why the Himalayas are rising by about 3 mm/year?

Because the compression zone hasn't reached equilibrium yet.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Every single thing, huh?
That’s not entirely accurate…
No one, I repeat, no one, has explained thru natural causes, why the megafauna are discovered within the Permafrost, throughout the northern hemisphere! And some of those specimens have been (and are currently being) found in an excellent state of preservation!

How did they get there?


And the other evidences supporting it, haven’t been refuted, either, lol!
Counter arguments are not refutations.

There's plenty of ways such could happen. Blizzards for example.

That and off course:
- animals frozen in permafrost in no way support a physically impossible flood model
- "we don't know how they were fast-frozen" is not a valid way to argue for a physically impossible flood model

 

[Subduction Zone]

That doesn't fit with the model of how subduction zones are supposed to work.

You are probably confused. There are various kinds of collisions at mes, I mean subduction zones. The most common one you see in books are oceanic plates ramming into and sinking under less dense continental plates. And that is how it started out with the oceanic part of the Indian plate running into and subducting under the Eurasian plate. But then the plate ran out of its oceanic part and it was continent against continent. Terrestrial continental plates are less dense than oceanic ones so a lot of the movement has just been one continent running over the other. Making a huge mountain range.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

It was a combination of biochemicals capable of reproducing itself. Thus the reproductions were capable of reproducing themselves too, and so on.

When? The earliest fossil evidence is from more than 3.5 bn years ago. So some time before that.

Did you enjoy reading that link I gave you about radiometric dating, by the way?

What were the formulas of these bio chemicals?

 

[SalixIncendium]

What were the formulas of these bio chemicals?

Are you a chemist? If so, please list your qualifications and where you received them.

If not, you don't deserve a response to this, because you're not qualified to draw any conclusion based any response.

 

[blü 2]

What were the formulas of these bio chemicals?

We don't know for sure, but as I said to you earlier, abiogenesis research has been a work in progress since the 1950s, and has come a long way, but not all the way,

I take it your church has an ongoing research section into the methods God employed to bring the universe into being, and how [he]'s able to perform miracles generally? How's all that going? What miracles can you now do as a result of their work?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

We don't know for sure, but as I said to you earlier, abiogenesis research has been a work in progress since the 1950s, and has come a long way, but not all the way,

I take it your church has an ongoing research section into the methods God employed to bring the universe into being, and how [he]'s able to perform miracles generally? How's all that going? What miracles can you now do as a result of their work?

So you have no answer whatsoever.
Maybe they should retract evolution and billions of years until they at least have a real rational theory.
Might spur them on to accomplish something

 

[SalixIncendium]

So you have no answer whatsoever.
Maybe they should retract evolution and billions of years until they at least have a real rational theory.
Might spur them on to accomplish something

You've been asked four questions in the last two posts. You've answered not a single one.

Is that a result of ignorance to the topic or disrespect for the community you share?

 

[blü 2]

So you have no answer whatsoever.

Obviously if you don't know how God did it, you have not a clue either.

And just as obviously, if your church isn't doing any useful and meaningful research into its own claims, they have no clue how it all works either;

So the only people actually looking for the answers are the scientists, no?

Maybe they should retract evolution and billions of years until they at least have a real rational theory.

Or maybe you should read some of those links I've been offering you and see what we know about how the real world works.

Try it ─ you might find actual understanding is a good feeling.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Obviously if you don't know how God did it, you have not a clue either.

And just as obviously, if your church isn't doing any useful and meaningful research into its own claims, they have no clue how it all works either;

So the only people actually looking for the answers are the scientists, no?


Or maybe you should read some of those links I've been offering you and see what we know about how the real world works.

Try it ─ you might find actual understanding is a good feeling.

I have already put up 2 infallible proofs that the Bible is the word of God, that God cerated everything in 6 days about 6000 years ago, without evolution and falsified billions of years also.
I have given my challenge that no one has met.
I have my many required questions which no one has an answer to any.
I have shown advanced scientific knowledge from the Bible and very many amazing predictions from the Bible that have come true in exact detail and exact timing the have come true in our very time.