Evolution and Creationism both have equal value and scientific evidence to support them.

[Wotan]

Another nail in ID's already heavily nailed coffin.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/100513-science-evolution-darwin-single-ancestor

It just gets clearer and clearer that ToE is correct and not simply the best explanation but the ONLY explanation that can be demonstrated by empirical evidence.

If you want to believe otherwise as a matter of religious faith so be it. But it IS a faith position. There is no science behind it.

 

[fantome profane]

Another nail in ID's already heavily nailed coffin.

All Species Evolved From Single Cell, Study Finds

It just gets clearer and clearer that ToE is correct and not simply the best explanation but the ONLY explanation that can be demonstrated by empirical evidence.

If you want to believe otherwise as a matter of religious faith so be it. But it IS a faith position. There is no science behind it.

Great link! I think you should start a new thread just for this, it deserves its own thread.

 

[Autodidact]

Yes and OJ was able to build a case that got him acquitted.

So you don't think we can learn about the natural world by examining the evidence? Then why did you say you accept the scientific method, which is based on doing just that?

 

[gnostic]

This is a typical creationist/theist's mistake or use of the word that they don't understand. Are you simply ignorant, or just a liar who like to twist words?

What is it with so many of you on here that you feel the need to make the discussion personal. Can you have a discussion without the personal insults?

I think that you are simply ignorant, with regards to science. But I've know Christians, who like to twist words to suit their agenda.

I think you should learn the distinction between theory and hypothesis (in science), because at this moment, I can see that you don't understand the differences between the two.

Since you have no verifiable evidences to support your ideas (about your "theory that God exists"), then it is not a "theory". What you have is simply "hypothesis".