Evolution and Creationism both have equal value and scientific evidence to support them.

[painted wolf]

I took my ball and went home because I was invited to a game where the opponent didn't really want to play. Weak beliefs need to be guarded.

Hardly... you asked and knowing how you are with de-railing threads (as you are trying to do here), I neutered that ability in utero.
Trust me, I've dealt with plenty of your kind of peddlers.
My faith is secure, but my patience for your tail-chasing proselytizing is limited. If the atheists on this board can't faze me you are hardly likely to.

wa:do

 

[painted wolf]

Painted Wolf believes in a creator. Ask her. Shes the biologist.

You notice I'm not trying to peddle faith as science.
My faith stands on its own and I don't have a book of myths to defend as facts.

wa:do

 

[tumbleweed41]

Danmac, would you care to provide the scientific "Creationist" evidence that is equal to the evidence supporting the ToE

Painted Wolf believes in a creator. Ask her. Shes the biologist.

And what does this post have to do with the topic?

So, you personally, have nothing to contribute to the OP?

Imagine that.

 

[Danmac]

Hardly... you asked and knowing how you are with de-railing threads (as you are trying to do here), I neutered that ability in utero.
Trust me, I've dealt with plenty of your kind of peddlers.
My faith is secure, but my patience for your tail-chasing proselytizing is limited. If the atheists on this board can't faze me you are hardly likely to.

wa:do

Well we'll never know now will we? Seems your faith must be shielded by a DIR thread. Try a debate forum next time. If your belief is well founded it should stand up against all attempts to proselytize. I know mine does.

 

[DeitySlayer]

I know mine does.

Only because you dismiss all contrary evidence as false, when it has been tested, re-tested and validified numerous times.

 

[painted wolf]

Well we'll never know now will we? Seems your faith must be shielded by a DIR thread. Try a debate forum next time. If your belief is well founded it should stand up against all attempts to proselytize. I know mine does.

As does mine... as your pathetic attempts thus far have done nothing but demonstrate. Honestly seven years of people like you on this forum (not to mention those in RL) haven't dented my faith, you don't think you will?
Nevermind, having seen the demonstrations of your ego scattered about this forum like corpses at a bug zapper, you don't need to answer that.

I am done letting you derail this thread, you obviously realize that creationism has no scientific merit and are desperate to shift the focus from yourself onto me.
This thread and those who are genuinely interested in it deserve better.

wa:do

 

[McBell]

I know mine does.

Does it?
IF your faith honestly did stand up like you claim, you would have no need for your willful ignorance.

 

[Autodidact]

I recently tried that. The other person chose a DIR thread. I guess that is a safe place to keep a weak argument intact. btw. I don't see you doing anything but hurling insults. Let me review some of your posts and see how many of them actually have to do with the topic at hand. I will be pressed to find any.

Does anyone know where I can find an irony meter? Mine just broke. Thanks.

I'm happy to meet you in a one-on-one thread on the subject of evolution, Danmac.

 

[Autodidact]

And what does this post have to do with the topic?

You want to know what a post asking about EVOLUTION and CREATIONISM has to do with a thread about EVOLUTION and CREATIONISM? I don't know, let me wrack my brain.

 

[McBell]

I know mine does.

Then why the need for all the lies, half truths, and misrepresentations?

I cannot help but wonder who you are trying to convince; us, or yourself.

 

[gnostic]

I have a theory that God exists.

Since Tristesse had reply to you first...

No, what you have is a hypothesis. And not a very good one. I suggest you investigate what a scientific theory actually is before making such an ignorant claim.

I'll have to agree with Tristesse.

You don't have a theory, Danmac. What you have is unprovable hypothesis.

A theory is best explanation that have verifiable evidences or data to support the conclusion of the of the original hypothesis.

What you have just simple belief. And mere belief don't equate with a theory.

Obviously, you don't understand what a scientific theory is, otherwise, you wouldn't use the word "theory". And your last statement prove just that, your ignorance with regards to science and theory.

That is why I call it a theory. Kinds like.... you know.....evolution.

This is a typical creationist/theist's mistake or use of the word that they don't understand. Are you simply ignorant, or just a liar who like to twist words?

 

[Autodidact]

This is a typical creationist/theist's mistake or use of the word that they don't understand. Are you simply ignorant, or just a liar who like to twist words?

We're not sure yet. It's one of the many questions Danmac is avoiding answering.

 

[McBell]

Are you simply ignorant, or just a liar who like to twist words?

Due to his blatant refusal to answer this very question, I have come to the conclusion that he is a bold faced liar and thus have his dishonest arse on ignore.

 

[Wotan]

Then why the need for all the lies, half truths, and misrepresentations?

I cannot help but wonder who you are trying to convince; us, or yourself.

Whichever it is doesn't matter. he is doing a poor job of both.:thud:

 

[Danmac]

This is a typical creationist/theist's mistake or use of the word that they don't understand. Are you simply ignorant, or just a liar who like to twist words?

What is it with so many of you on here that you feel the need to make the discussion personal. Can you have a discussion without the personal insults?

 

[Danmac]

Due to his blatant refusal to answer this very question, I have come to the conclusion that he is a bold faced liar and thus have his dishonest arse on ignore.

How old did you say you were? From your posts I'm guessing 7 or 8

 

[painted wolf]

What is it with so many of you on here that you feel the need to make the discussion personal. Can you have a discussion without the personal insults?

Pot

How old did you say you were? From your posts I'm guessing 7 or 8

Kettle



wa:do

 

[DeitySlayer]

How old did you say you were? From your posts I'm guessing 7 or 8

From the intellectual content of your posts, I would guess 2 or 3, but I have a suspicion that this may be slightly generous. Danmac, if you want respect, it's not a question of changing your religion or standing up and shouting 'God is a phony!' It's a question of looking at the mountains of evidence presented to you, reading and understanding, asking for help if and when you need it, rather than persisting in an unsubstantiated and bull-headed approach to the world in general.

 

[Danmac]

From the intellectual content of your posts, I would guess 2 or 3, but I have a suspicion that this may be slightly generous. Danmac, if you want respect, it's not a question of changing your religion or standing up and shouting 'God is a phony!' It's a question of looking at the mountains of evidence presented to you, reading and understanding, asking for help if and when you need it, rather than persisting in an unsubstantiated and bull-headed approach to the world in general.

Yes and OJ was able to build a case that got him acquitted.

 

[DeitySlayer]

Yes and OJ was able to build a case that got him acquitted.

OJ was tried once, using a set of evidence built over a limited period of time. Biological evolution has been tried every day since its inception, using evidence built over 150 years, and no-one has been able to refute it in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Analogy falls flat on it's face.:thud: