Unification
Well-Known Member
Because the Aristotelian ladder of progress view is two millennia old, does not mirror basic Darwinian principals and is dead wrong.
No laws need be broken and there is not evidence of anything else. The "mind" like the "soul" appears to be an artifact of the internal communication of the brain, there is no basis for it except the time delay between the two hemispheres.
No, you are playing semantic games as your are with (4) below.
1. Moving from left to right in the collective intelligence/knowledge evolution from Darwinism to Phylogenesis over two millenia and becoming more advanced with the discovery of new things, such as DNA, etc. This just proves true, that's it is all "accepted," "supported," and "assumption" until a better model is found. Rinse, recycle, repeat. The greatest and best scientific discoveries are yet to come, such as that humans themselves, as a small new tiny branch on the phylogenesis/evolutionary tree... That our spirits have been not just the new tiny branch, but have been the whole tree of life going from body to body, species to species, reptile to mammal, mammal to human, human back to microbe/worm, etc.
Here is where you're wrong. Let's assume what you state is true. The mind doesn't exist and that it is just a part of the brain with two hemispheres and time delay, all is physical, internally and externally.
This breaks the first law of thermodynamics, that you can't get something out of nothing.
The brain/mind must then also only be able to create/imagine/think/know what already exists. Illusion, imagination, reality/deception, true/false, etc would all have to be TRUE. There would be no wrong. The unicorn would also have to be true, as well as Santa Claus, etc. The brain/mind would only be able to manipulate what already exists. PHYSICAL CANNOT CREATE NON-PHYSICAL.
Indirectly and unaware... You have no choice but to believe in God, unicorns, and Santa Claus, and everything else mindkind has created in their imaginations based upon an all-physical universe.
This is just one law, we can couple this into Newton's laws, relativity, and mathematical principles as well if you'd like to peacefully discuss.
"Semantics" using your logic regarding this matter would become irrelevant because all logic and knowledge and language would have to be true and reality in the all physical world "belief."
New age still wasn't defined. Your definition would have to involve what "old age" means as well.