Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Who are you talking to??
If you can't be honest how do you expect anyone to have a discussion with you? Let me explain something to you, the theory of evolution does not rely upon abiogenesis. It does not matter what the first source of life was. Relying on lying sources will not change this fact.
What's an "evolutionist?"
Why would anybody care to address a bunch of dishonest quote mines? Do you have any honest arguments to offer?
When you rely on lying idiots you look like a lying idiot. If you notice your dishonest site goes out of its way to claim the authors have "PhD"s. The problem is that they are in irrelevant fields. They are being misleading by doing so. The so called "experts" that your sources rely on are no more expert than I am. And since I don't have to lie I can beat them in a debate.
When someone has to lie to hold a idiotic belief then yes, I am smarter than that person in that aspect. Your source lies to you. Those are not experts in the field.
You have yet to be able to respond to a single post explaining the misinformation and outright lies you are posting, so why should anybody take the time to read your posts any longer?
It is a geological uplift that makes up most of southern Missouri, northern Arkansas and little bits of Oklahoma and southern Illinois. We have the oldest mountains in North America. Except they are very low, having eroded down to nearly nothing. It was largely forest prior to settlement and still has a fair area of woods, clear, gravel-bottom streams, springs, caves and lots of hills, though my part of the Ozarks has some open, rolling land as well. The geology is karst, hence all the springs and caves. The portion in northwest Arkansas is actually much more wild, less developed, and, until recently, less populated, but times are changing.
Darwin, I hear has a lot of influence out of Asia, economically and somewhat culturally, or so I am told. My brush with it was research going on to restart cotton production there. Being tropical, it is difficult to manage cotton with all the pests. Modern genetics may be the solution, though I have sort of lost track of that, being removed in time from the work by nearly a decade.
I still love small towns and rural life. With the internet, it is not so difficult to reach out for more modern conveniences by mail, though, I imagine if you are used to nightlife, it would be difficult.
That sounds awesome. What an exciting way to travel. I am probably too soft to do something like that now, but at one time, that sort of thing held a lot of appeal. I love camping. I still do it when I can, though not from the back of a motorbike.
He really showed you. What happened? Ha Ha! I guess, he is used to ignoring people that can speed read.
Adaptation is not proven. Adaptation is supported by the evidence and is evolution. All macro-evolution is, is adaptation over deep time. The evidence supports macro-evolution too, you just refuse to look at the evidence and learn what it all means.
I thought he was done with this thread/forum, but it looks like he is back to give us the rest of the standard creationist claptrap that he had not dumped on us yet. Who could have predicted he would get to the law of biogenesis with creationist claims about it that we have seen a million times. Well, you, me, and everyone else could have guessed it. Is it really guessing, when you already know what to expect?
