Evolution of Human

[FearGod]

You are asking to create a dichotomy between humans and animals that does not exist based upon things not stipulated to and not in evidence. Stupid questions can draw naught but stupid answers.

Not having answers doesn't mean that the question is stupid.
You may say also that asking what was before singularity is kind of stupid question according to your thinking ability.

 

[ScuzManiac]

Not having answers doesn't mean that the question is stupid.
You may say also that asking what was before singularity is kind of stupid question according to your thinking ability.

The question is pretty stupid in my opinion as well...

That's like asking when a certain species of animal developed the ability to communicate with other members of that species...

As far as when human intelligence evolved...it still is.

We're learning new things every single day...making new things...trying new things.

In fact, you just learned how stupid your original question comes off to people.

You're evolving right here on this very forum!

 

[FearGod]

The question is pretty stupid in my opinion as well...

That's like asking when a certain species of animal developed the ability to communicate with other members of that species...

As far as when human intelligence evolved...it still is.

We're learning new things every single day...making new things...trying new things.

In fact, you just learned how stupid your original question comes off to people.

You're evolving right here on this very forum!

Do you imply that all evolutionists in this forum who answered the question were stupids ?

 

[idav]

Not having answers doesn't mean that the question is stupid.

Really it isn't so much a stupid question but a loaded question, making a false assumption in the question which is also a form of strawman. Fallacies. Alluding to humans not being animals is false to begin with.

 

[ScuzManiac]

Do you imply that all evolutionists in this forum who answered the question were stupids ?

Nope.

I'm pretty sure I was very straight forward when I said...

"The question is pretty stupid in my opinion as well..."

Heck, I answer stupid questions every single day....

 

[FearGod]

Nope.

I'm pretty sure I was very straight forward when I said...

"The question is pretty stupid in my opinion as well..."

Heck, I answer stupid questions every single day....

And your reply i think is utterly a stupid one.

Anything can be questioned, but you can say i don't have the answer or you can make assumptions ..etc

But to be honest i expected a silly and stupid answers but not as stupid as yours.

 

[FearGod]

Really it isn't so much a stupid question but a loaded question, making a false assumption in the question which is also a form of strawman. Fallacies. Alluding to humans not being animals is false to begin with.

Did i say humans are plants.

 

[idav]

Did i say humans are plants.

Thats not what I said.

 

[FearGod]

Thats not what I said.

You did.

Really it isn't so much a stupid question but a loaded question, making a false assumption in the question which is also a form of strawman. Fallacies. Alluding to humans not being animals is false to begin with.

 

[idav]

You did.

Where does it say "plants"?

What is your take? If humans are animals then humans are plants?

 

[FearGod]

Where does it say "plants"?

What is your take? If humans are animals then humans are plants?

It seems that you don't know what you did say.

 

[idav]

It seems that you don't know what you did say.

Humans are animals.

 

[sojourner]

Dear sojourner, Why don't you TRY to support your unbelieving view that God was WRONG, since HE is the Author of Genesis? What is indicated is that YOUR interpretation is WRONG, since you falsely assume that you know more than God. Repent of your evil thinking. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

Since God didn't author Genesis, I'm afraid it's you who is wrong -- not only about the authorship of Genesis, but also in error of standing in judgment of me and my thinking.

 

[ScuzManiac]

And your reply i think is utterly a stupid one.

Anything can be questioned, but you can say i don't have the answer or you can make assumptions ..etc

But to be honest i expected a silly and stupid answers but not as stupid as yours.

I expected you to use proper grammar and type complete sentences.

I guess all of us are getting something that we didn't expect, huh?

 

[sojourner]

You are asking to create a dichotomy between humans and animals that does not exist based upon things not stipulated to and not in evidence. Stupid questions can draw naught but stupid answers.

I think that's what he's hoping for, so that he can turn around and say, "That's no kind of real answer."

 

[Sapiens]

Not having answers doesn't mean that the question is stupid.
You may say also that asking what was before singularity is kind of stupid question according to your thinking ability.

Yeah ... that's a pretty stupid question too, at this stage in things, at least, since the only non-stupid answer is "nobody knows, we have no data."

 

[Sapiens]

I think that's what he's hoping for, so that he can turn around and say, "That's no kind of real answer."

Agreed, that's because that no kind of real question.

 

[FearGod]

Yeah ... that's a pretty stupid question too, at this stage in things, at least, since the only non-stupid answer is "nobody knows, we have no data."

Not knowing the answers doesn't make the question a stupid one.

As i said the answer can be i don't know or making assumptions.

 

[Sapiens]

Not knowing the answers does not make the question a stupid one, but asking questions that you know there are no answers to ... that's a waste of time, and thus stupid.

 

[FearGod]

Not knowing the answers does not make the question a stupid one, but asking questions that you know there are no answers to ... that's a waste of time, and thus stupid.

Many atheists asked "who created God" and they think that their question is a wise one.

So do you think they are stupids because they used to ask such question.