• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Evolution of Human

ScuzManiac

Active Member
How did it take thousands of years for humans to figure out how to make microchips? Were the people thousands of years ago or even a hundred years ago that much stupider than modern man? Surely if those people were just as smart as us, the microchip would have been invented millenia ago? I therefore contend that intelligent humans have existed for less than 100 years. Everyone before that was just a dumb-dumb.

Coming from that guy that just said "stupider." :p

I'm only kidding though....

I agree with you 100%.

People want to make all these arguments about human intelligence...

But all 99% of the amazing innovations that we use....

We made in the last 200 years or so.

To me, that's further proof that humans have evolved not only physically...

But mentally as well. A lot of people will say that we are smarter than animals and I don't agree with that even now (maybe some animals). I DEFINITELY don't think we were drastically smarter than animals 2,000+ years ago....
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
A lot of people will say that we are smarter than animals and I don't agree with that even now (maybe some animals). I DEFINITELY don't think we were drastically smarter than animals 2,000+ years ago....

We are smarter, a lot of us have smartphones now.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
How did it take thousands of years for humans to figure out how to make microchips? Were the people thousands of years ago or even a hundred years ago that much stupider than modern man? Surely if those people were just as smart as us, the microchip would have been invented millenia ago? I therefore contend that intelligent humans have existed for less than 100 years. Everyone before that was just a dumb-dumb.

190000 it takes human to start reading and writing
10000 it takes human to invent the IC.

Yes it make sense. :clap
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
How do you know these "others" are similar to him?

Are you similar to Dennis Rader (The BTK Killer) because you both believe in God?

Anyways...

That's the problem with people nowadays.

They're too willing to just "accept" things so they don't have to use their brain.

I'm sure you also think that we only use 10% of our brain too, huh?

I were talking about atheists sharing the same idea that God doesn't exist and supporting evolutionists as opposing to creationists.:facepalm:
 

ScuzManiac

Active Member
190000 it takes human to start reading and writing
10000 it takes human to invent the IC.

Yes it make sense. :clap

But in the span of 100 years....

Humans invented the automobile, learned to fly, developed computers...

And television, film, video games, penicillin, and MUCH more...

;)
 

ScuzManiac

Active Member
I were talking about atheists sharing the same idea that God doesn't exist and supporting evolutionists as opposing to creationists.:facepalm:

But that's not what you said.

Someone sharing a common view doesn't mean they are just alike.

And I suppose you made another typo as you like to put it.

You meant "was" instead of "were" I'm sure.

:rolleyes:
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
But that's not what you said.

Someone sharing a common view doesn't mean they are just alike.

And I suppose you made another typo as you like to put it.

You meant "was" instead of "were" I'm sure.

:rolleyes:

Just concentrate while reading.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Or you could learn proper grammar before you make sly attempts to insult the intelligence of others.

;)

I didn't insult your intelligence as a homo sapiens, learn proper grammar which you had repeated it many times in this thread isn't that different than asking you to concentrate while reading.
 

ScuzManiac

Active Member
I didn't insult your intelligence as a homo sapiens, learn proper grammar which you had repeated it many times in this thread isn't that different than asking you to concentrate while reading.

You're right...

But the difference is this.

I do concentrate while reading hence why I was able to point out your poor attempt at forming a sentence.

You've made no attempt to correct your grammar and if you have....

I'm truly sorry that you can't distinguish "was" from "were."

:(
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Where do you get 19,000 years from though?

Hieroglyphics are pretty much the oldest known system in relation to reading...

And humans have been on this planet for AT LEAST 100,000 years.

190,000 years and not 19,000 years.

Search for Homo Sapiens to know how long modern human existed on earth.
 

ScuzManiac

Active Member
190,000 years and not 19,000 years.

Search for Homo Sapiens to know how long modern human existed on earth.

Gotcha. Honest mistake on my end...

And I already know. A rough estimate is around 200,000 years....

Now, tell me this.

How do YOU know it took them that long to learn how to read?

Because we can't find text/imagery from 200,000 years ago?

We also can't find ANY Biblical relics that SHOULD only be a few thousand years old.

So, with your train of thought, wouldn't that mean they don't exist either?
 

ScuzManiac

Active Member

Okay? THAT particular title IS correct....

"I were talking about atheists sharing the same idea that God doesn't exist and supporting evolutionists as opposing to creationists."

That one isn't. You spoke of an action using the word "were" which is incorrect.

That particular title speaks of a past emotion/experience using the word "were" which is correct.

You don't know proper grammar. Admit it and move on.

Now, we'll get back to the topic of this debate.

For future reference:

How to use Were to | Learn English

Learn it. You'll probably need it later in life if you want to be taken seriously.
 

Sapiens

Polymathematician
I believe intelligence appeared only before around 12000 years ago, the evidence is overwhelming that homo sapiens before 200000 years is incomparable to modern humans.

Only stupids and dumps can believe that Homo Sapiens spent 190000 years to start planting and building.

So it isn't my problem if you believe such a stupid thing.

Every one knows when intelligence had started on earth and it supports the creationists and refutes the evolutionists.
Your beliefs (once again) are not supported by any evidence.

BTW: the genus name is Capitalized and the species name is lower case. Thus is should be Home sapiens, unless you want to appear to be a dump.
Did we really know ?
How life existed out of non-living matter assuming that matter existed out of nothingness which by itself is impossible.

It doesn't need but a little wisdom in order to realize that the word meant to be dumb.



The child learn to speak in one year without teaching, The child is smart enough to memorize the words and to realize its meanings by seeing and hearing.

The birds learn how to build their own nests without teaching, do you think the birds spent millions of years to learn building their nests.



To you only and for some others who are similar to you that can accept any thing but not God.
Children need to be taught to speak, at least by example. Children who are not spoken to at all have severe communication problems.

Birds are born with their basic songs encoded into their DNA, they do not need to learn them, though they can learn to modify them. It is an entirely different process and is not akin to human speech.
7. a. slow to understand; dim-witted
b. foolish; stupid. See also dumb down

dumb - definition of dumb by The Free Dictionary





And who was the first teacher. ;)

The child is smart enough to memorize and realize words within one year where as Homo Sapien spent 190000 years to start thinking.



So human learns language, what about the animal language, is it by learning too or innate instinct.

Which is absurd, human learn but animals are stupids now and in other debate they are more intelligent than humans.

What kind of hypocrisy is this.



No, i don't think so.
There is not such thing as "animal language," at least in the sense that we use the work "language" to describe human speech.
I didn't insult your intelligence as a homo sapiens, learn proper grammar which you had repeated it many times in this thread isn't that different than asking you to concentrate while reading.
Good try, but still wrong. It's Homo sapiens ... see? Capitalize the initial letter of the Genus and everything else lower case. Got it now?
 
Top